Wheeler, W.M., 1910
(Species Checklist, Species by Country)
Feitosa and Brandao (2008): Lachnomyrmex are most often encountered in the leaf litter of submontane wet forests. Despite our poor knowledge of the biology of the cryptobiotic Lachnomyrmex species, field observations allied to information recorded in museum specimen labels provide a first glimpse of the natural history of the genus. Nests are found in the ground, among rotten leaves, and inside fallen logs. Workers generally forage alone on the ground or in the low vegetation; apparently they do not recruit nestmates or form pheromone trails.
- 1 Identification
- 2 Distribution
- 3 Biology
- 4 Castes
- 5 Morphology
- 6 Nomenclature
- 7 References
Monomorphic myrmicine ants. Body variably rugose except for the primarily smooth scrobe, legs, and gaster. Usually covered by long flexuous hairs. Mandible triangular with two apical and two basal teeth, both pairs equidistant from a single median tooth (dental formula 2–1–2). Clypeus bicarinate and with a broad anteromedian incision. Palpal formula 2, 2. Antennal scrobe present and well developed. Antenna 11-segmented with 2-segmented apical club. Promesonotum variably convex in profile and always fused. Well developed propodeal spines and toothed propodeal lobes present. (Feitosa and Brandao 2008)
Within its Neotropical range Lachnomyrmex can be easily distinguished from the other genera by its diagnostic characters.
|See images of species within this genus|
Keys to Species in this Genus
Feitosa and Brandão (2008) - Lachnomyrmex is endemic to the Neotropics, ranging from southern Mexico, east into the Caribbean (Trinidad), and south to northern Argentina. Despite a few records of Lachnomyrmex in lowland forests of the Amazon Basin and other lowland localities, these ants apparently reach their peak of abundance and diversity in the submontane wet forests (500–2000m) of northern South America and southern Central America, where 12 of the 16 known species occur. Lachnomyrmex ants are also commonly encountered in scattered submontane localities along the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. The preference for submontane forests is shared with species of the related Central American stenammine genus Stenamma and may suggest that workers are tolerant to relative low temperature and wet conditions (Longino 2007). Intensive surveys in Central and Southeastern Brazil savannas failed to record any Lachnomyrmex representatives (Silva et al. 2004).
Distribution and Richness based on AntMaps
Species by Region
Number of species within biogeographic regions, along with the total number of species for each region.
|Afrotropical Region||Australasian Region||Indo-Australian Region||Malagasy Region||Nearctic Region||Neotropical Region||Oriental Region||Palaearctic Region|
Feitosa and Brandao (2008): Very little is known about the biology of these cryptic ants. Workers are frequently found in leaf litter and soil samples submitted to Winkler or Berlese extractors, but are never especially abundant within samples. When a dealate gyne is found associated with workers in 1m2 samples of leaf litter, normally it is found singly, which suggests that colonies are relatively small and apparently monogynic; workers and nests are extremely difficult to spot in the field, because the workers are very slow moving and well camouflaged; if there is any leaf-litter nest structure, it is destroyed during sifting, but our impression is that they do not construct any permanent nidal structure. Species of Lachnomyrmex apparently nest within the leaf litter, inside natural cavities of the superficial soil layers, fallen logs, and rotten wood, as evidenced by the large number of soil-covered individuals collected, from information recorded in specimen label data, and from observations of collectors. Workers forage alone, in the leaf litter and in the low vegetation, occasionally among epiphytes and moss, probably preying on small soft-bodied arthropods and possibly harvesting plant exudates.
Life History Traits
- Mean colony size: "small colonies" (Greer et al., 2021)
- Compound colony type: not parasitic (Greer et al., 2021)
- Nest site: hypogaeic (Greer et al., 2021)
- Diet class: omnivore (Greer et al., 2021)
- Foraging stratum: subterranean/leaf litter (Greer et al., 2021)
- Foraging behaviour: solitary (Greer et al., 2021)
- Explore: Show all Worker Morphology data or Search these data. See also a list of all data tables or learn how data is managed.
• Antennal segment count: 11 • Antennal club: 2 • Palp formula: 2,2 • Spur formula: 0,0 • Eyes: 11-100 ommatidia • Pronotal Spines: absent • Mesonotal Spines: absent • Propodeal Spines: present • Petiolar Spines: absent • Caste: none or weak • Sting: present • Metaplural Gland: present • Cocoon: absent
- Explore: Show all Male Morphology data or Search these data. See also a list of all data tables or learn how data is managed.
• Caste unknown
The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's Online Catalogue of the Ants of the World.
- LACHNOMYRMEX [Myrmicinae: Stenammini]
- Lachnomyrmex Wheeler, W.M. 1910a: 263. Type-species: Lachnomyrmex scrobiculatus, by monotypy.
Unless otherwise noted the text for the remainder of this section is reported from the publication that includes the original description.
Feitosa and Brandão (2008):
Size relatively small (TL 2.26–4.54 mm). Color reddish-brown to black, with appendages slightly lighter. Integument thick, shiny and usually strongly sculptured on head, mesosoma, and waist. Body sculpturation composed mainly of vermiculate, variably spaced, and short to continuous wavy rugae. Cephalic dorsum usually presenting sparse piligerous punctuations among rugae. Dorsal surface of mandibles with sparse piligerous punctuations and short, longitudinal striae normally restricted to basal portion; surface of clypeus opaque, with sparse piligerous punctuations; inner surface of antennal scrobes predominantly smooth and shining; ventral face of head and nuchal area smooth and shining. Rugae on metanotal groove usually parallel. Dorsal face of propodeum with short, transversal striae between bases of propodeal spines; anterior coxae usually presenting short and fine transversal rugulation. Dorsal surface of petiolar peduncle, anterior face of node and surface of gaster usually smooth and shining. Pilosity generally abundant. Dorsum of body frequently covered by dense, whitish to cream-colored, long, flexuous hairs (except for the first gastral segments of some species). Short subdecumbent hairs densely covering antennae and distal portion of legs. Cephalic dorsum with long subdecumbent hairs converging towards head center. Clypeus with a row of hairs, getting gradually longer from lateral to median portion, so that median clypeal hairs surpass mandibles midlength; frontal carinae with three to four extremely long, equidistant hairs projecting laterally, fairly surpassing the lateral margins of head. Extremely short apressed hairs sparsely covering gaster.
Head as long as or longer than broad in full-face view, with posterolateral corners rounded and vertexal margin flat to strongly convex; lateral margins gently converging anteriorly towards mandibles. Mandibles relatively long, subtriangular, and with external margins moderately convex; masticatory margins with five teeth: two apical, two basal, and a single median tooth, equidistant from others; apical tooth distinctly more developed than preceding ones. Intramandibular space absent when mandibles are fully closed against clypeus. Clypeus relatively narrow, medially elevated, feebly emarginate on anterolateral portions, and slightly convex in side view; anterior border with a broad median incision; clypeal central disc bicarinate. Pal-pal formula 2, 2. Genae with short, deep, longitudinal striae. Frontal lobes laterally rounded to subquadrate, not strongly expanded but covering antennal insertions, prolonged posteriorly as a pair of strongly developed frontal carinae which form the dorsal margins of a pair of deep and conspicuous antennal scrobes; scrobes run back almost to posterolateral corners; ventral margins of scrobes formed by a long longitudinal ridge running above eyes. Frontal area and fronto-clypeal suture obsolete. Antennae 11-segmented; scapes as long as scrobes and moderately incrassate medially; funiculus with conspicuous 2-segmented apical club; apical segment about twice longer than subapical. Compound eyes elliptical, relatively well developed and convex, placed immediately before midline of head; ocelli absent. Promesonotum in profile fused and swollen, with dorsal outline convex and variably elevated above the level of dorsal surface of propodeum. Metanotal suture obsolete to deeply impressed. Propodeum strongly sloped, with a pair of well developed, acute spines; propodeal spiracles set close to propodeal declivity, with orifices circular and slightly directed posteriorly. Propodeal lobes subquadrate, armed with a superior, long to short tooth. Legs relatively short and robust; mid and hind tibiae devoid of spurs; tarsal claws simple and strongly curved.
Petiole with an elongate anterior peduncle, eventually with a discrete anteroventral denticle; petiolar node normally well developed. Postpetiole usually broader than long in dorsal view, without a well developed node and presenting a subpetiolar process in some species. Gaster globose to slightly elongate, without anterior shoulders.
Sting apparatus (after Kugler 1978, based on an unidentified Lachnomyrmex close to Lachnomyrmex scrobiculatus): Spiracular plate lost during preparation. Quadrate plate relatively narrow ventrally and with lateral lobe reduced to a weak ridge. Oblong plate with very narrow posterior arm and with prominent posterior apodeme. Gonostylus uniformly sclerotized and with relatively broad basal half. Triangular plate with long and slender body; long and relatively narrow ventroapical process; dorsoapical process very low. Lancet long, very narrow, weak, distal end tapers slightly towards subacute apex; groove and ventral ridge very closely set, parallel for most of lancet length, subterminal end; symmetrical and feebly acute apical portion. Sting shaft very long, slender, hemocoel highly reduced, slightly forked end in ventral view; very well developed valve chamber and sting bulb, distinct in profile; sting bulb dorsal profile gently convex; sting base vertical in profile, with prominent anterolateral processes, and very weak basal ridge. U-shaped furcula; lateral arms do not curve posteriorly; dorsal arm reduced to a small tubercle.
Like conspecific workers, with the modifications expected for myrmicine gynes. Body rugulation mostly longitudinal, especially on mesosoma. Three ocelli present, with anterior slightly larger than posterior ones. Scutum convex; notauli and parapsidial lines usually indistinct from surrounding sculpture; tegulae blackish and projected laterally. Transcutal articulation feebly convex; prescutellum with central area indistinct, scutoscutellar sulcus variably impressed; axilae laterally subquadrate; scutellum flat and semicircular; dorsum of propodeum reduced, with spines shorter than in conspecific workers. Forewings with a narrow and poorly colored stigma; longitudinal veins Sc+R, SR, M+Cu, and A present. Cells C and R closed. Hind wings with venation reduced; veins Sc+R, SR, and M+Cu present; SR and Sc+R extending shortly beyond R cell; three submedian hamuli present.
(After Wheeler & Wheeler 1989, based on Lachnomyrmex pilosus, although called Lachnomyrmex scrobiculatus by these authors). Head hairs sparse, long, and smooth, with evenly curved shaft. Body hairs sparse and long of four types: (1) smooth with frayed tip; (2) flexuous shaft with a small bulbous tip; (3) smooth shaft with uncinate tip; and (4) flexuous shaft with anchor-like tip. Body profile pheidoloid (head ventral, near anterior end, mounted on a short neck which corresponds to the pronotum). Mandible ectatommoid, subtriangular with a medial blade arising from anterior surface and with two medial teeth; apex curved medially, forming a tooth. Abdomen short, stout, straight, and apically rounded.
- Bolton, B. 1994. Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 222 pp. (page 106, Lachnomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Stenammini)
- Bolton, B. 1995a. A taxonomic and zoogeographical census of the extant ant taxa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Nat. Hist. 2 29: 1037-1056 (page 1050, Lachnomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Stenammini)
- Bolton, B. 1995b. A new general catalogue of the ants of the world. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 504 pp. (page 220, Lachnomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Stenammini)
- Bolton, B. 2003. Synopsis and Classification of Formicidae. Mem. Am. Entomol. Inst. 71: 370pp (page 203, Lachnomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Stenammini)
- Boudinot, B.E. 2019. Hormigas de Colombia. Cap. 15. Clave para las subfamilias y generos basada en machos. Pp. 487-499 in: Fernández, F., Guerrero, R.J., Delsinne, T. (eds.) 2019d. Hormigas de Colombia. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 1198 pp.
- Branstetter, M.G., Longino, J.T., Reyes- López, J.L., Brady, S.G., Schultz, T.R. 2022. Out of the temperate zone: A phylogenomic test of the biogeographical conservatism hypothesis in a contrarian clade of ants. Journal of Biogeography 00, 1-14 (doi:10.1111/jbi.14462).
- Cantone S. 2018. Winged Ants, The queen. Dichotomous key to genera of winged female ants in the World. The Wings of Ants: morphological and systematic relationships (self-published).
- Emery, C. 1914e. Intorno alla classificazione dei Myrmicinae. Rend. Sess. R. Accad. Sci. Ist. Bologna Cl. Sci. Fis. (n.s.) 18: 29-42 (page 42, Lachnomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Leptothoracini)
- Emery, C. 1924f . Hymenoptera. Fam. Formicidae. Subfam. Myrmicinae. [concl.]. Genera Insectorum 174C: 207-397 (page 269, Lachnomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Leptothoracini)
- Feitosa, R. M. and Brandao, C.R.F. 2008. A taxonomic revision of the Neotropical myrmicine ant genus Lachnomyrmex Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa. 1890:1-49.
- Fernandez, F., Guerrero, R.J., Sánchez-Restrepo, A.F. 2021. Sistemática y diversidad de las hormigas neotropicales. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 47, 1–20 (doi:10.25100/socolen.v47i1.11082).
- Forel, A. 1917. Cadre synoptique actuel de la faune universelle des fourmis. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 51: 229-253 (page 245, Lachnomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Leptothoracini)
- Hanisch, P.E., Sosa-Calvo, J., Schultz, T.R. 2022. The last piece of the puzzle? Phylogenetic position and natural history of the monotypic fungus-farming ant genus Paramycetophylax (Formicidae: Attini). Insect Systematics and Diversity 6 (1): 11:1-17 (doi:10.1093/isd/ixab029).
- Hölldobler, B.; Wilson, E. O. 1990. The ants. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, xii + 732 pp. (page 16, Lachnomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Pheidolini)
- Kugler, C. 1997. Stings of some species of Lordomyrma and Mayriella (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Insecta Mundi 11, 193-199.
- Kusnezov, N. 1964 . Zoogeografía de las hormigas en Sudamérica. Acta Zool. Lilloana 19: 25-186 (page 57, Lachnomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Myrmicini)
- Smith, M. R. 1944e. The genus Lachnomyrmex, with the description of a second species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 46: 225-228 (page 225, Revision of genus)
- Weber, N. A. 1950d. New Trinidad Myrmicinae, with a note on Basiceros Schulz (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). American Museum Novitates 1465: 1-6 (page 3, key to species)
- Wheeler, W. M. 1910d. Three new genera of myrmicine ants from tropical America. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 28: 259-265 (page 263, Lachnomyrmex as genus)
- Wheeler, W. M. 1922i. Ants of the American Museum Congo expedition. A contribution to the myrmecology of Africa. VII. Keys to the genera and subgenera of ants. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 45: 631-710 (page 644, Lachnomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Leptothoracini)