Gesomyrmex
Gesomyrmex Temporal range: 48.6–0 Ma Eocene – Recent | |
---|---|
Gesomyrmex chaperi | |
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Arthropoda |
Class: | Insecta |
Order: | Hymenoptera |
Family: | Formicidae |
Subfamily: | Formicinae |
Tribe: | Gesomyrmecini |
Genus: | Gesomyrmex Mayr, 1868 |
Type species | |
Gesomyrmex hoernesi | |
Diversity | |
7 species 12 fossil species (Species Checklist, Species by Country) | |
Synonyms | |
|
A poorly known resident of tree canopies in Oriental tropics, showing a striking diversity of caste morphologies. Queens and supersoldiers share an elongate head with powerful mandibles, an adaptation to chew an entrance tunnel to the innermost pith of living branches (Peeters et al. 2017).
Gesomyrmex encompasses seven extant species, all endemic to southeast Asian rainforests, north of the Wallace line (Antmaps.org, Janicki et al. 2016), together with 12 fossil-based species. The genus was in fact first described by Mayr (1868) from Baltic amber fossils, assigned to Gesomyrmex hoernesi, some 24 years before the first extant species, Gesomyrmex chaperi, was published. Wheeler (1915) later provided a more thorough description of this species in his monograph on the ants of the Baltic amber, and synonymized Dimorphomyrmex with Gesomyrmex (Wheeler, 1929b), noting remarkable polymorphism among workers. Dlussky and colleagues (Dlussky et al. 2009, 2015) more recently raised the number of fossil species to eleven, following the description of eight new gynes preserved as compression fossils from Eocene limestones of Germany, Croatia and Russia (Aria et al., 2023).
Four extant species of Gesomyrmex (Gesomyrmex chaperi, Gesomyrmex howardi, Gesomyrmex kalshoveni and Gesomyrmex spatulatus) are known only from workers, while two species (Gesomyrmex luzonensis and Gesomyrmex tobiasi) were described from lone queens (Dubovikov, 2004).
Photo Gallery
Identification
Workers of the genus are easily recognised by the following features (Bolton, 1994):
- eyes reniform and massive relative to head size
- antennal scape passing below the eye in their resting position
- masticatory margin of mandible with more than four teeth
The workers have 8-segmented antennae and soldiers of Gesomyrmex chaperi have 9-segmented antennae (Wheeler, 1916), whereas queens have 10-segmented antennae (Dubovikov, 2004).
Gary Alpert is of the opinion that all described species belong to Gesomyrmex chaperi (the name with priority). Caste polymorphism has led to great taxonomic confusion, both in extant and fossil species. Marked colour variations further complicate alpha taxonomy. Wheeler (1929) previously suggested that extant species may correspond to “sub-species or varieties”.
The genus is similar to Santschiella in that it possesses very large eyes, widely separated antennal insertions, and scapes that pass below the eyes.
See images of species within this genus |
Distribution
Distribution and Richness based on AntMaps
Species by Region
Number of species within biogeographic regions, along with the total number of species for each region.
Afrotropical Region | Australasian Region | Indo-Australian Region | Malagasy Region | Nearctic Region | Neotropical Region | Oriental Region | Palaearctic Region | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
Total Species | 2841 | 1736 | 3045 | 932 | 835 | 4379 | 1741 | 2862 |
Fossils
Fossils are known from: Baltic amber, Baltic Sea region, Europe (Priabonian, Late Eocene), Bitterfeld amber, Baltic Sea region, Europe (Priabonian, Late Eocene), Bolshaya Svetlovodnaya, Sikhote-Alin, Russia (Priabonian, Late Eocene), Danish-Scandinavian amber (Priabonian, Late Eocene), Eckfeld, Germany (Lutetian, Middle Eocene), Messel, Germany (Lutetian, Middle Eocene), Oise amber, France (Ypresian, Early Eocene), Radoboj, Croatia (Burdigalian, Early Miocene), Rovno amber, Baltic Sea region, Europe (Priabonian, Late Eocene).
Distinctions among fossil morphotypes based on body size, anterior clypeal margin and occipital cephalic margin support in general a radiation of the genus during the early Cenozoic. However, species erected based on dubious characters from compression fossils, such as colour or ‘head shape’ (prone to taphonomic deformation and changes due to orientation of entombment in these fossils) (Dlussky et al. 2009, 2015), do suggest some overestimation in palaeodiversity. Generic apomorphies are also missing or concealed in certain cases, such as in Gesomyrmex flavescens, questioning the affinity of these fossils with Gesomyrmex (Aria et al., 2023).
Biology
Peeters et al. (2017) Gesomyrmex chaperi presents an intriguing division of labour: workers are the active hunters, with very distinct mandibles. Queens (as well as two kinds of soldiers) have different mandibles, indicating that they do not hunt during colony foundation. However, a foundress needs to chew an entrance tunnel through living wood, and then block this nest entrance for many months until the colony is strong enough to produce the first soldiers. Supersoldiers are presumably reared even later in colony ontogeny, because they are more costly. Relatively few supersoldiers are present and they show two queen-like behaviours: they stay inside nest chambers and block the entrances, and they chew entrance holes when starting other nests belonging to the same colony. Supersoldiers also store nutrients (trophic eggs) in their gaster.
Aria et al. (2023) Although our understanding of the ecology and biology of Gesomyrmex remains scarce, observations have been made by some authors pointing to a diurnal arboreal lifestyle (reviews in Dlussky, Wappler and Wedmann 2009; Peeters, Ito, Wiwatwitaya, Keller, Hashim and Molet 2017). Gesomyrmex typically nests in both live and dead stems or branches, co-opting tunnels burrowed by other insects or digging their own (Peeters, Ito, Wiwatwitaya, Keller, Hashim and Molet 2017). Colonies were initially reported to have a single queen and relatively few individuals (150 in one of the nests studied), whereas a more recent study found them to be polydomous (Peeters, Ito, Wiwatwitaya, Keller, Hashim and Molet 2017). Likewise, the worker population has initially been considered to encompass a broad polymorphism with morphological overlaps, but would instead be characterized by a subdivision into three distinct asexual castes including supersoldiers (Peeters, Ito, Wiwatwitaya, Keller, Hashim and Molet 2017). Soldier morphs had been already recognized in G. hoernesi and in some modern species in which asexual individuals closely resemble their gynes (Bolton1994; Dubivikoff 2004; Dlussky, Wappler and Wedmann 2009). These recent findings (Peeters, Ito, Wiwatwitaya, Keller, Hashim and Molet 2017) would be in accordance with recent phylogenomic analyses placing Gesomyrmex closer to other polymorphic lineages among Formicinae (Blaimer, Brady, Schultz, Lloyd, Fisher and Ward 2015), and therefore suggesting more complex eusocial habits, even if geographical or specific variations cannot be excluded. Interestingly, Gesomyrmex is found to be sister genus to Oecophylla (Blaimer, Brady, Schultz, Lloyd, Fisher and Ward 2015), also typically arboreal, but with a much broader contemporaneous distribution spanning SE Asia, India, Oceania and Africa (http://antmaps.org).
Dubovikov (2004) Members of this genus are very rare and ancient forms. The population of their nests are small and they live in small branches of trees (Cole, 1949b). Identification key to five living Gesomyrmex species was published by Cole (1949a).
Life History Traits
- Mean colony size: ~150 (Greer et al., 2021)
- Compound colony type: not parasitic (Greer et al., 2021)
- Nest site: arboreal (Greer et al., 2021)
- Diet class: omnivore (Greer et al., 2021)
- Foraging stratum: arboreal (Greer et al., 2021)
Castes
In addition to winged queens, three sterile castes can be distinguished using discrete morphological traits, morphometry and total body size (Peeters et al. 2017). Observations of behaviour are challenging in tree canopies, and functional morphology can be used to predict the specialised functions of different castes.
Morphology
Worker Morphology
- Explore: Show all Worker Morphology data or Search these data. See also a list of all data tables or learn how data is managed.
• Antennal segment count: 8 in worker, 10 in queen • Antennal club: gradual • Palp formula: 6,4 • Total dental count: 6-10 • Spur formula: 1 simple, 1 simple; 0,0 • Eyes: >100 ommatidia • Scrobes: absent • Pronotal Spines: absent • Mesonotal Spines: absent • Propodeal Spines: absent • Petiolar Spines: absent • Caste: polymorphic • Sting: absent • Metaplural Gland: present • Cocoon: absent
Male Morphology
- Explore: Show all Male Morphology data or Search these data. See also a list of all data tables or learn how data is managed.
• Antennal segment count 11 • Antennal club 0 • Palp formula 6,4 • Total dental count 1 • Notes: from literature
Phylogeny
Formicinae |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Phylogeny of Formicinae for details.
Nomenclature
The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's Online Catalogue of the Ants of the World.
- GESOMYRMEX [Formicinae: Gesomyrmecini]
- Gesomyrmex Mayr, 1868c: 50. Type-species: †Gesomyrmex hoernesi, by monotypy.
- Gesomyrmex senior synonym of Gaesomyrmex: Forel, 1893a: 167.
- Gesomyrmex senior synonym of Dimorphomyrmex: Wheeler, W.M. 1929a: 1.
- DIMORPHOMYRMEX [junior synonym of Gesomyrmex]
- Dimorphomyrmex André, 1892b: 49. Type-species: Dimorphomyrmex janeti (junior synonym of Gesomyrmex chaperi), by monotypy.
- Dimorphomyrmex junior synonym of Gesomyrmex: Wheeler, W.M. 1929a: 1.
- GAESOMYRMEX [junior synonym of Gesomyrmex]
- Gaesomyrmex Dalla Torre, 1893: 175, unjustified emendation of Gesomyrmex.
- Gaesomyrmex junior synonym of Gesomyrmex: Forel, 1893a: 167.
Ward et al. (2016) - The tribe Gesomyrmecini is here restricted to Gesomyrmex and two similar fossil taxa (Wheeler 1915). Bolton (2003) also placed Santschiella in Gesomyrmecini, but the molecular results do not support a close relationship between Gesomyrmex and Santschiella (Blaimer et al. 2015). The similarities between the two—very large eyes, widely separated antennal insertions, and scapes that pass below the eyes (Bolton 2003)-must be interpreted as due to convergence.
References
- Agosti, D. 1991. Revision of the oriental ant genus Cladomyrma, with an outline of the higher classification of the Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst. Entomol. 16: 293-310. (page 295, Gesomyrmex in Formicinae, Formica genus group)
- Aria, C., Jouault, C., Perrichot, V., Nel, A. 2023. The megathermal ant genus Gesomyrmex (Formicidae: Formicinae), palaeoindicator of wide latitudinal biome homogeneity during the PETM. Geological Magazine, 1–11 (doi:10.1017/s0016756822001248).
- Ashmead, W. H. 1905c. A skeleton of a new arrangement of the families, subfamilies, tribes and genera of the ants, or the superfamily Formicoidea. Can. Entomol. 37: 381-384 (page 384, Gesomyrmex in Gesomyrmicinae, Gesomyrmicini)
- Barden, P. 2017. Fossil ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): ancient diversity and the rise of modern lineages. Myrmecological News 24: 1-30.
- Barden, P., Engel, M.S. 2020. Fossil social insects. Encyclopedia of Social Insects, Springer, Cham (doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90306-4_45-1).
- Bolton, B. 1994. Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 222 pp. (page 50, Gesomyrmex in Formicinae, Gesomyrmecini)
- Bolton, B. 2003. Synopsis and Classification of Formicidae. Mem. Am. Entomol. Inst. 71: 370pp (page 108, Gesomyrmex in Formicinae, Gesomyrmecini)
- Boudinot, B.E., Borowiec, M.L., Prebus, M.M. 2022. Phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the ant genus Lasius, the tribe Lasiini and the subfamily Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Systematic Entomology 47, 113-151 (doi:10.1111/syen.12522).
- Cantone S. 2018. Winged Ants, The queen. Dichotomous key to genera of winged female ants in the World. The Wings of Ants: morphological and systematic relationships (self-published).
- Cole, A. C., Jr. 1949a. A study of the genus Gesomyrmex Mayr, and a description of a species new to the genus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 42: 71-76. (page 71, Revision of genus)
- Dalla Torre, K. W. von. 1893. Catalogus Hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. Vol. 7. Formicidae (Heterogyna). Leipzig: W. Engelmann, 289 pp. (page 175, Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae)
- Dlussky, G.M., Wappler, T., Wedmann, S. 2009. Fossil ants of the genus Gesomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the Eocene of Europe and remarks on the evolution of arboreal ant communities. Zootaxa 2031: 1-20 (doi:10.11646/zootaxa.2031.1.1).
- Donisthorpe, H. 1943g. A list of the type-species of the genera and subgenera of the Formicidae. [part]. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 11(10): 617-688 (page 647, Gesomyrmex in Formicinae, Dimorphomyrmecini)
- Dubovikoff, D.A. 2004a. A new species of the genus Gesomyrmex Mayr, 1868 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Vietnam. Trudy Russkogo Entomologicheskogo Obshchestva. 75(1):219-221. (page 220, queen described)
- Emery, C. 1895l. Die Gattung Dorylus Fab. und die systematische Eintheilung der Formiciden. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Syst. Geogr. Biol. Tiere 8: 685-778 (page 772, Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae, Oecophyllini)
- Emery, C. 1925b. Revision des espèces paléarctiques du genre Tapinoma. Rev. Suisse Zool. 32: 45-64 (page 47, Gesomyrmex senior synonym of Gaesomyrmex; Gesomyrmex in Formicinae, Dimorphomyrmecini)
- Forel, A. 1878c. Études myrmécologiques en 1878 (première partie) avec l'anatomie du gésier des fourmis. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 15: 337-392 (page 367, Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae [Camponotidae])
- Forel, A. 1893b. Sur la classification de la famille des Formicides, avec remarques synonymiques. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Belg. 37: 161-167 (page 167, Gesomyrmex senior synonym of Gaesomyrmex; page 165, Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae, Camponotini)
- Forel, A. 1912j. Formicides néotropiques. Part VI. 5me sous-famille Camponotinae Forel. Mém. Soc. Entomol. Belg. 20: 59-92 (page 89, Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae, Gesomyrmecini)
- Forel, A. 1917. Cadre synoptique actuel de la faune universelle des fourmis. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 51: 229-253 (page 249, Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae, Gesomyrmecini)
- Mayr, G. 1868c. Die Ameisen des baltischen Bernsteins. Beitr. Naturkd. Preuss. 1: 1-102 (page 50, Gesomyrmex in Formicinae [Formicidae])
- Peeters C, Ito F, Wiwatwitaya D, Keller R, Hashim R & Molet M. 2017. Striking polymorphism among infertile helpers in the arboreal ant Gesomyrmex. Asian Myrmecology 9: e009015 (1-15).
- Vankerkhoven, F., Hendrickx, H. & Dekoninck, W. 2008. A well preserved fossil in Baltic amber of the enigmatic genus Gesomyrmex Mayr, 1868 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bulletin de la Société Royale Belge d'Entomologie 145:87-90.
- Ward, P.S., Blaimer, B.B., Fisher, B.L. 2016. A revised phylogenetic classification of the ant subfamily Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with resurrection of the genera Colobopsis and Dinomyrmex. Zootaxa. 4072(3):343–357. (doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4072.3.4).
- Wheeler, W.M. 1910b. Ants: their structure, development and behavior. New York: Columbia University Press, xxv + 663 pp. (page 143, Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae, Oecophyllini)
- Wheeler, W.M. 1915i. The ants of the Baltic Amber. Schriften der Physikalisch-Ökonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg 55: 1-142. (page 107, Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae, Gesomyrmecini)
- Wheeler, W.M. 1922i. Ants of the American Museum Congo expedition. A contribution to the myrmecology of Africa. VII. Keys to the genera and subgenera of ants. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 45: 631-710 (page 697, Gesomyrmex in Formicinae, Gesomyrmecini)
- Wheeler, W.M. 1929a. The identity of the ant genera Gesomyrmex Mayr and Dimorphomyrmex Ernest André. Psyche (Camb.) 36: 1-12 (page 1, Gesomyrmex senior synonym of Dimorphomyrmex; page 12, Gesomyrmex in Formicinae, Gesomyrmecini)
- Wheeler, W.M. 1929b. Note on Gesomyrmex. Psyche (Camb.) 36: 91–92.
- Wheeler, W.M., 1930. A second note on Gesomyrmex. Psyche (Camb.) 37: 35–40.
- Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser function
- Articles using diversity taxobox
- Photo Gallery
- Not in key
- Need species key
- Baltic amber fossil
- Eocene
- Bitterfeld amber fossil
- Bolshaya Svetlovodnaya fossil
- Danish-Scandinavian amber fossil
- Eckfeld, Germany fossil
- Messel fossil
- Oise amber fossil
- Radoboj fossil
- Miocene
- Rovno amber fossil
- Genus
- Extant genus
- Formicidae
- Formicinae
- Gesomyrmecini
- Gesomyrmex
- Formicinae genera
- Gesomyrmecini genera
- Need Body Text