Erromyrma latinodis

AntWiki: The Ants --- Online
Erromyrma latinodis
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hymenoptera
Family: Formicidae
Subfamily: Myrmicinae
Tribe: Solenopsidini
Genus: Erromyrma
Species: E. latinodis
Binomial name
Erromyrma latinodis
(Mayr, 1872)

Monomorium latinode casent0132440 profile 1.jpg

Monomorium latinode casent0132440 dorsal 1.jpg

Specimen Label

Synonyms


Common Name
Shiwa-hime-ari
Language: Japanese

Distributed widely in pantropical and subtropical regions through human activity. In Oman, a nest series was found under a pomegranate tree. Several workers were collected from under a rock where the soil was dry and loose and in an area in cultivated rose plantations. Individuals were also found among leaf litter where soil was dry (Sharaf et al 2018). In Madagascar, Heterick (2006) reports that apart from an excellent series from the Province Fianarantsoa and a small number from Province Antsiranana (Museum of Comparative Zoology) from tropical and lowland rainforest, I have seen no other Malagasy material pertaining to this tramp species. Malagasy specimens have been collected on low vegetation and on the ground. In the Malagasy region this species inhabits montane rainforest, mangrove, Uapaca woodland, dry forest, and anthropogenic habitats from elevations of 2 to 1726 m. Workers were collected from a range of microhabitats and methods including foraging on low vegetation, on the ground, in ground nests, sifted litter, under stones, rotten wood or from dead twigs above ground. The males were collected along with workers and queens under the bark on the main trunk of a mango tree along a village road (Ramamonjisoa et al., 2023).

At a Glance • Invasive  

Identification

Heterick (2006) - Malagasy region: Appearance somewhat suggestive of taxa from the Australasian Chelaner rubriceps species group. However, none of the latter has a PF of 3,3. The type specimens for the nominal taxa currently associated with E. latinode (i.e., E. latinode, E. latinode bruneum and E. voeltzkowi) show variation in color and size, and the lectotype of E. latinode also exhibits some differences in the appearance of the head capsule.

Keys including this Species

Distribution

Latitudinal Distribution Pattern

Latitudinal Range: 30.2483° to -12.11666667°.

   
North
Temperate 		North
Subtropical 		Tropical South
Subtropical 		South
Temperate

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists

Afrotropical Region: Comoros, Mozambique, Saint Helena, United Republic of Tanzania.
Australasian Region: New Zealand.
Indo-Australian Region: Borneo (type locality), Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore.
Malagasy Region: Madagascar, Mayotte.
Oriental Region: Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka, Thailand.
Palaearctic Region: China, Japan, Oman.

Distribution based on AntMaps

AntMapLegend.png

Distribution based on AntWeb specimens

Check data from AntWeb

Countries Occupied

Number of countries occupied by this species based on AntWiki Regional Taxon Lists. In general, fewer countries occupied indicates a narrower range, while more countries indicates a more widespread species.
pChart

Estimated Abundance

Relative abundance based on number of AntMaps records per species (this species within the purple bar). Fewer records (to the left) indicates a less abundant/encountered species while more records (to the right) indicates more abundant/encountered species.
pChart

Biology

Ramamonjisoa et al. (2023), discussing this species in the Malagasy region: The males for this species were only collected after six expeditions. They are not collected by traditional means for example: malaise traps sampling or UV light samples from the region. Initial expeditions to known localities in northern Madagascar did not find the males. Colonies were kept alive for over a year without the production of males. Two males were finally found at one of the known collection sites.

The C01 data confirms the identification of the males and also shows a pattern of 0% sequence divergence between the samples from Madagascar, Comoros, and Mayotte. The lack of sequence divergence across island systems supports the hypothesis that this species is introduced in the region. Low sequence diversity could also be explained by other factors such as reproductive systems. The difficulty of finding males could be linked to a reproductive system that would reduce sequence divergence.

Association with Other Organisms

Explore-icon.png Explore: Show all Associate data or Search these data. See also a list of all data tables or learn how data is managed.
  • This species is a mutualist for the aphid Aphis craccivora (a trophobiont) (Rakhshan and Ahmad, 2015; Saddiqui et al., 2019).

Castes

Worker

Images from AntWeb

Monomorium latinode casent0010941 head 1.jpgMonomorium latinode casent0010941 profile 1.jpgMonomorium latinode casent0010941 dorsal 1.jpgMonomorium latinode casent0010941 label 1.jpg
Worker. Specimen code casent0010941. Photographer April Nobile, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by NHMUK, London, U.K..
Monomorium latinode casent0107541 head 1.jpgMonomorium latinode casent0107541 profile 1.jpgMonomorium latinode casent0107541 dorsal 1.jpgMonomorium latinode casent0107541 label 1.jpg
Worker. Specimen code casent0107541. Photographer April Nobile, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by CAS, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Monomorium latinode casent0132440 head 1.jpgMonomorium latinode casent0132440 profile 1.jpgMonomorium latinode casent0132440 dorsal 1.jpgMonomorium latinode casent0132440 label 1.jpg
Worker. Specimen code casent0132440. Photographer Erin Prado, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by CAS, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Monomorium latinode casent0008632 head 1.jpgMonomorium latinode casent0008632 profile 1.jpgMonomorium latinode casent0008632 dorsal 1.jpgMonomorium latinode casent0008632 label 1.jpg
Worker. Specimen code casent0008632. Photographer April Nobile, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by MSNG, Genoa, Italy.
Monomorium latinode casent0101591 head 1.jpg
Paralectotype of Monomorium voeltzkowi. Worker. Specimen code casent0101591. Photographer Z. Lieberman, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by MHNG, Geneva, Switzerland.
Monomorium latinode casent0101621 dorsal 1.jpg
Lectotype of Monomorium voeltzkowi. Worker. Specimen code casent0101621. Photographer Z. Lieberman, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by MHNG, Geneva, Switzerland.
Monomorium latinode casent0101928 dorsal 1.jpg
Paralectotype of Monomorium voeltzkowi. Worker. Specimen code casent0101928. Photographer Z. Lieberman, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by MHNG, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Ramamonjisoa et al. (2023), Figure 2. Erromyrma latinodis male (CASENT0788835). A, body in lateral view. B, head in full-face view. C, body in dorsal view.
  • Ramamonjisoa et al. (2023), Figure 3. Male forewing veins of Erromyrma latinodis (CASENT0788835). Abbreviations: Pt, pterostigma; Sc, subcosta; R, r, radius; Rs, rs, radial sector; M, m, media; Cu, cubitus; A, a, anal.

Nomenclature

The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's Online Catalogue of the Ants of the World.

  • latinodis. Monomorium latinode Mayr, 1872: 152 (w.) BORNEO (East Malaysia: Sarawak).
    • Type-material: syntype workers (number not stated).
    • Type-locality: Malaysia (“Borneo”): Sarawak, 1865-66 (J. Doria & O. Beccari).
    • Type-depositories: BMNH, NHMW.
    • [Misspelled as latnoda by Smith, F. 1873: ix.]
    • Combination in Erromyrma: Fisher & Bolton, 2016: 276.
    • Imai, et al. 1984: 8 (k.).
    • Status as species: Smith, F. 1873: ix; Forel, 1885b: 182; Emery, 1887b: 458; Emery, 1889b: 503; Dalla Torre, 1893: 67; Forel, 1903a: 687; Rothney, 1903: 97; Bingham, 1903: 211; Forel, 1907a: 19; Wheeler, W.M. 1909d: 334; Yano, 1910: 419; Forel, 1912a: 55; Forel, 1913f: 191; Viehmeyer, 1916a: 132; Wheeler, W.M. 1919e: 84; Emery, 1922e: 171; Wheeler, W.M. 1927d: 5; Wheeler, W.M. 1929g: 60; Wheeler, W.M. 1930a: 99; Wheeler, W.M. 1930h: 66; Wheeler, W.M. 1934h: 13; Wheeler, W.M. 1935g: 23; Teranishi, 1940: 57; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 165; Ettershank, 1966: 90; Wilson & Taylor, 1967: 66; Onoyama, 1980: 198; Bolton, 1987: 429 (redescription); Ogata, 1991b: 107; Morisita, et al. 1992: 40; Bolton, 1995b: 263; Wu, J. & Wang, 1995: 88; Tiwari, 1999: 54; Imai, et al. 2003: 133; Lin & Wu, 2003: 66; Ghosh, et al. 2005: 27; Jaitrong & Nabhitabhata, 2005: 28; Heterick, 2006: 108 (redescription); Don, 2007: 190; Wetterer, Epadaler, Ashmole, et al. 2007: 31; Framenau & Thomas, 2008: 69; Terayama, 2009: 153; Pfeiffer, et al. 2011: 47; Guénard & Dunn, 2012: 45; Bharti, Guénard, et al. 2016: 39; Fisher & Bolton, 2016: 276; Sharaf, Fisher, et al. 2018: 25; Dias, R.K.S. et al. 2020: 74.
    • Senior synonym of bruneum: Bolton, 1987: 429; Heterick, 2006: 108.
    • Senior synonym of voeltzkowi: Bolton, 1987: 429; Heterick, 2006: 108.
    • Distribution [tramp species]:
    • Afrotropical: Mozambique, Tanzania.
    • Austral: New Zealand.
    • Malagasy: Comoros, Madagascar, Mayotte I.
    • Malesian: Hawaii Is, Indonesia (Java, Sumatra), Malaysia (Sarawak), Singapore.
    • Oriental: Bangladesh, China, Christmas I., India, Japan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand.
    • Palaearctic: Oman, Netherlands, St Helena I.
  • bruneum. Monomorium latinode var. bruneum Emery, 1893f: 243 (w.) SRI LANKA.
    • Type-material: syntype workers (number not stated).
    • Type-locality: Sri Lanka (“Ceylon”): Kandy, i.-ii.1892 (E. Simon).
    • Type-depository: MSNG.
    • Subspecies of latinodis: Emery, 1895k: 465; Forel, 1903a: 687; Emery, 1922e: 171; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 165; Ettershank, 1966: 88.
    • Junior synonym of latinodis: Bolton, 1987: 429; Heterick, 2006: 108.
  • latinodoides. Monomorium latinodoides Wheeler, W.M. 1928c: 17 (w.q.) CHINA (Hong Kong).
    • Type-material: 5 syntype worlkers, 1 syntype queen.
    • Type-locality: China: Hong Kong, Kowloon (F. Silvestri).
    • Type-depository: MCZC.
    • Status as species: Wheeler, W.M. 1930h: 67; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 167; Ettershank, 1966: 90; Bolton, 1995b: 263; Guénard & Dunn, 2012: 45.
    • Junior synonym of latinodis: Ramamonjisoa et al., 2023: 66.
  • voeltzkowi. Monomorium voeltzkowi Forel, 1907g: 78 (w.) TANZANIA (Pemba I.).
    • Type-material: syntype workers (number not stated).
    • Type-locality: Tanzania (“Ostafrika”): Pemba I., Chake-Chake (A. Voeltzkow).
    • Type-depositories: MCZC, MHNG.
    • Status as species: Emery, 1922e: 180; Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 867; Ettershank, 1966: 93.
    • Junior synonym of latinodis: Bolton, 1987: 429; Heterick, 2006: 108.

Type Material

  • Monomorium latinode: Heterick (2006) - Lectotype: worker, Borneo Sarawak (Malaysia), G. Doria (The Natural History Museum). A single carded worker labeled syntype is here designated lectotype to fix the name for populations of E. latinode, which has a more convex outline to the vertex than E. latinode bruneum or E. voeltzkowi. Other syntype specimens may still exist (seen by Bolton in 1987), and these should be treated as paralectotypes.
  • Monomorium latinodoides: Syntype worker: China: Hong Kong, Kowloon (F. Silvestri) unique specimen identifier: MCZ-ENT00727982, examined by Ramamonjisoa et al. (2023), Museum of Comparative Zoology.

Taxonomic Notes

Monomorium latinodoides (Ramamonjisoa et al. (2023)) - The type series at MCZ was examined. The syntypes series are labeled “Kowloon” (F. Silvestri): one pin with 3 workers (MCZ-ENT00020883) and 2 workers and one dealate queen on a second pin (MCZ-ENT00727982). The workers match the description and diagnosis of worker of E. latinodis. We formally combine the species in Erromyrma and synonymize the species with E. latinodis. However, we exclude the queen (on MCZ-ENT00727982) from the syntype series; it belongs to the genus Carebara. Unless otherwise noted the text for the remainder of this section is reported from the publication that includes the original description.

Description

Worker

Heterick (2006) - Lectotype (M. latinode): HML 2.02 HL 0.72 HW 0.59 CeI 81 SL 0.60 SI 103 PW 0.42. Lectotype (Monomorium latinode bruneum): HML 2.03 HL 0.73 HW 0.59 CeI 81 SL 0.56 SI 95 PW 0.46. Lectotype (Monomorium voeltzkowi): HML 1.66 HL 0.60 HW 0.46 CeI 77 SL 0.46 SI 100 PW 0.36. (non-types): HML 1.83–2.29 HL 0.65–0.83 HW 0.52–0.73 CeI 79–88 SL 0.50–0.62 SI 85–98 PW 0.38–0.49 (n=20).

HEAD: Head oval; vertex weakly convex; frons shining and smooth except for piliferous pits; pilosity of frons a mixture of well-spaced, distinctly longer erect and semi-erect setae interspersed with shorter decumbent setae or setulae. Eye moderate, eye width 1–1.5× greatest width of antennal scape; (in full-face view) eyes set below midpoint of head capsule; (viewed in profile) eyes set posteriad of midline of head capsule; eye elliptical, curvature of inner eye margin may be more pronounced than that of its outer margin. Antennal segments 12; antennal club three-segmented. Clypeal carinae weakly to strongly defined; anteromedian clypeal margin straight, or, emarginate, clypeal carinae terminating in blunt angles; paraclypeal setae moderately long and fine, curved; posteromedian clypeal margin extending slightly beyond level of posterior margin of antennal fossae. Anterior tentorial pits situated nearer antennal fossae than mandibular insertions. Frontal lobes straight, parallel. Psammophore absent. Palp formula 3,3. Mandibular teeth five; mandibles triangular and smooth (except for piliferous pits); masticatory margin of mandibles approximately vertical or weakly oblique; basal tooth smaller than t4 (five teeth present).

MESOSOMA: Promesonotum shining and smooth on dorsum, entire lower mesopleuron distinctly striolate; (viewed in profile) anterior promesonotum smoothly rounded, thereafter more-or-less flattened, promesonotum on same plane as propodeum; promesonotal setae greater than twelve; standing promesonotal setae consisting of well-spaced, incurved, erect and semi-erect setae only; appressed promesonotal setulae very sparse or absent. Metanotal groove vestigial. Propodeum uniformly finely striolate; propodeal dorsum flat throughout most of its length; propodeum smoothly rounded or with indistinct angle; standing propodeal setae numerous, wholly or mainly erect or suberect, without conspicuous paired setae evident; appressed propodeal setulae very sparse or absent; propodeal spiracle equidistant from metanotal groove and declivitous face of propodeum. Vestibule of propodeal spiracle distinct in some specimens. Propodeal lobes present as blunt-angled flanges.

PETIOLE AND POSTPETIOLE: Petiolar spiracle lateral and situated within anterior sector of petiolar node; node (viewed in profile) conical, vertex rounded; appearance of node shining and smooth throughout; ratio of greatest node breadth (viewed from front) to greatest node width (viewed in profile) between 4:3 and1:1; anteroventral petiolar process absent or vestigial; ventral petiolar lobe absent; height ratio of petiole to postpetiole between 4:3 and 1:1; height–length ratio of postpetiole between 4:3 and 1:1; postpetiole shining and smooth; postpetiolar sternite depressed near its junction with gaster, and sloping anteriad at angle of 45–60 to form large conspicuous lip at its anterior end.

GASTER: Pilosity of first gastral tergite consisting of well-spaced, erect and semi-erect setae interspersed with a few appressed setulae.

GENERAL CHARACTERS: Color head, mesosoma and appendages brownish-yellow, gaster brown. Worker caste monophasically allometric, i.e., with variable size, but not morphology among workers from same nest.

Karyotype

Explore-icon.png Explore: Show all Karyotype data or Search these data. See also a list of all data tables or learn how data is managed.
  • 2n = 70 (India) (Imai et al., 1984) (as Monomorium latinode).

References

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

  • Abe T., and A. Maeda. 1977. Fauna and density of ants in sugarcane fields of the southern part of Okinawa Island. Pp. 75-91 in: Ikehara, S. (ed.) 1977. Ecological studies of nature conservation of the Ryukyu Islands - (III). Naha, Okinawa: University of the Ryukyus, 202 pp.
  • Abe T.; Nakamori, M.; Uezu, K. 1976. Fauna and density of ants of a coastal limestone area in Okinawa Island. Pp. 113-120 in: Ikehara, S. (ed.) 1976. Ecological studies of nature conservation of the Ryukyu Islands - (II). Naha, Okinawa: University of the Ryukyus, 141 pp.
  • Azuma, S. and M. Kinjo. 1987. Family Formicidae, In Checklist of the insects of Okinawa. The Biological Society of Okinawa, Nishihara. Pages 310-312.
  • Bolton B. 1987. A review of the Solenopsis genus-group and revision of Afrotropical Monomorium Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Entomology 54: 263-452.
  • Chapman, J. W., and Capco, S. R. 1951. Check list of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Asia. Monogr. Inst. Sci. Technol. Manila 1: 1-327
  • Dias R. K. S. 2002. Current knowledge on ants of Sri Lanka. ANeT Newsletter 4: 17- 21.
  • Dias R. K. S. 2006. Current taxonomic status of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Sri Lanka. The Fauna of Sri Lanka: 43-52. Bambaradeniya, C.N.B. (Editor), 2006. Fauna of Sri Lanka: Status of Taxonomy, Research and Conservation. The World Conservation Union, Colombo, Sri Lanka & Government of Sri Lanka. viii + 308pp.
  • Dias R. K. S., K. R. K. A. Kosgamage, and H. A. W. S. Peiris. 2012. The Taxonomy and Conservation Status of Ants (Order: Hymenoptera, Family: Formicidae) in Sri Lanka. In: The National Red List 2012 of Sri Lanka; Conservation Status of the Fauna and Flora. Weerakoon, D.K. & S. Wijesundara Eds., Ministry of Environment, Colombo, Sri Lanka. p11-19.
  • Emery C. 1887. Catalogo delle formiche esistenti nelle collezioni del Museo Civico di Genova. Parte terza. Formiche della regione Indo-Malese e dell'Australia (continuazione e fine). [concl.]. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. 25(5): 427-473.
  • Emery C. 1893. Voyage de M. E. Simon à l'île de Ceylan (janvier-février 1892). Formicides. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 62: 239-258.
  • Emery, C.. "Catalogo delle formiche esistenti nelle collezioni del Museo Civico di Genova. Parte terza. Formiche della regione Indo-Malese e dell'Australia (continuazione e fine)." Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale Giacomo Doria (Genova) (2) 5, no. 25 (1887): 427-473.
  • Ettershank G. 1966. A generic revision of the world Myrmicinae related to Solenopsis and Pheidologeton (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Aust. J. Zool. 14: 73-171.
  • Fontanilla A. M., A. Nakamura, Z. Xu, M. Cao, R. L. Kitching, Y. Tang, and C. J. Burwell. 2019. Taxonomic and functional ant diversity along tropical, subtropical, and subalpine elevational transects in southwest China. Insects 10, 128; doi:10.3390/insects10050128
  • Forel A. 1885. Indian ants of the Indian Museum, Calcutta. J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal Part II Nat. Sci. 54: 176-182.
  • Forel A. 1903. Les Formicides de l'Empire des Indes et de Ceylan. Part X. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 14: 679-715.
  • Forel A. 1912. H. Sauter's Formosa-Ausbeute. Formicidae (Hym.) (Schluss). Entomol. Mitt. 1: 45-61.
  • Forel A. 1913. H. Sauter's Formosa-Ausbeute: Formicidae II. Arch. Naturgesch. (A)79(6): 183-202
  • Framenau V.W., and M.L. Thomas. 2008. Ants of Christmas Island (Indian Ocean); identification and distribution. Records of the Western Australian Museum 25: 45-85.
  • Ghosh S. N., S. Sheela, and B. G. Kundu. 2005. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Rabindra Sarovar, Kolkata. Records of the Zoological Survey of India. Occasional Paper 234: 1-40.
  • Guénard B., and R. R. Dunn. 2012. A checklist of the ants of China. Zootaxa 3558: 1-77.
  • Hannan M.A. 2008. New ant records fro Bangladesh. Asian Myrmecology 2: 95-98.
  • Harada Y., T. Yamaguchi, D. Fukukura, and H, Mizumata. 2014. Ants of ports on Amami Islands - Monitoring of alien ant species. Bull. Biogeogr. Soc. Japan. 69: 83-90.
  • Heterick B. 2006. A Revision of the Malagasy Ants Belonging to Genus Monomorium Mayr, 1855 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Proceeding of the California Academy of Sciences (PCAS) 57: 69-202
  • Huang Jian-hua, Zhou Shan-yi. 2007. A checklist of family Formicidae of China - Myrmicinae (Part II) (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Journal of Guangxi Normal University : Natural Science Edition 25(1): 91-99.
  • Jaitrong W.; Nabhitabhata, J. 2005. A list of known ant species of Thailand. The Thailand Natural History Museum Journal 1(1): 9-54.
  • Li Q., B. D. Hoffmann, Z. X. Lu, and Y. Q. Chen. 2017. Ants show that the conservation potential of afforestation efforts in Chinese valley-type savanna is dependent upon the afforestation method. Journal of Insect Conservation DOI 10.1007/s10841-017-0005-0
  • Li Q., Z. Lu, Z. Wei, M. Yanyan, and F. Ping. 2015. Communities of ground-dwelling ants in different plantation forest in arid-hot valleys of Jinsha river, Yunnan Province, China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 51(8): 134-142.
  • Li Z.h. 2006. List of Chinese Insects. Volume 4. Sun Yat-sen University Press
  • Liu X., Z. Xu, N. Yu, and C. Zhang. 2016. Distribution patterns of ant species ( Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Galongla Mountains and Medog Valley of Southeastern Tibet. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 52(11): 88-95.
  • Narendra A., H. Gibb, and T. M. Ali. 2011. Structure of ant assemblages in Western Ghats, India: role of habitat, disturbance and introduced species. Insect Conservation and diversity 4(2): 132-141.
  • Neville, P. J., O'Dowd, D. J., and Yen, A. L. 2008. Issues and implications for research on disturbed oceanic islands illustrated through an ant survey of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands. J Insect Conserv. 12:313-323.
  • Neville, P.J., D.J. O'Dowd and A.L. Yen. 2008. Issues and implications for research on disturbed oceanic islands illustrated through an ant survey of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands. Insect Conserv. 12. 313-323.
  • Onoyama K. 1976. A premilinary study on the ant fauna of Okinawa-ken, with taxonomic notes (Japan; Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ecol. Stud. Nat. Cons. Ryukyu Isl. II: 121-141.
  • Pfeiffer M.; Mezger, D.; Hosoishi, S.; Bakhtiar, E. Y.; Kohout, R. J. 2011. The Formicidae of Borneo (Insecta: Hymenoptera): a preliminary species list. Asian Myrmecology 4:9-58
  • Rajan P. D., M. Zacharias, and T. M. Mustak Ali. 2006. Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Fauna of Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple Wildlife Sanctuary (Karnataka). Conservation Area Series, Zool. Surv. India.i-iv,27: 153-188.
  • Rickson F.R., and M.M. Rickson. 1998. The cashew nut, Anacardium occidentale (Anacardiaceae), and its perennial association with ants: extrafloral nectary location and the potential for ant defense. American Journal of Botany 85(6): 835-849.
  • Sheela S. 2008. Handbook of Hymenoptera, Formicidae. Zoological Survey of India, 56 pages
  • Shimono A., and S. Yamane. 2003. Ant species diversity on Okinoerabu-jima, the Ryukyus, southern Japan. For the Establishment of Remote Islands Study (Kagoshima Univ.) 3: 11-29.
  • Shukla R. K., H. Singh, N. Rastogi, and V. M. Agarwal. 2013. Impact of abundant Pheidole ant species on soil nutrients in relation to the food biology of the species. Applied Soil Ecology 71: 15– 23.
  • Song Y., Z. Xu, C. Li, N. Zhang, L. Zhang, H. Jiang, and F. Mo. 2013. An Analysis on the Ant Fauna of the Nangun river Nature Reserve in Yunnan, China. Forest Research 26(6): 773-780.
  • Tak N. 1995. Studies on ants (Formicidae) of Rajasthan - 1 Jodhpur. Hexapoda 7(1): 17-28.
  • Tak N. 2009. Ants Formicidae of Rajasthan. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper No. 288, iv, 46 p
  • Tak N., and S. I. Kazmi. 2013. On some ants (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Nagaland, India. Rec. zool. Surv. India: 113(1): 169-182.
  • Terayama M. 1992. Structure of ant communities in East Asia. A. Regional differences and species richness. Bulletin of the Bio-geographical Society of Japan 47: 1-31.
  • Terayama M. 1992. Structure of ant communities in east Asia. 1. Regional differences and species richness. Bull. Biogeogr. Soc. Japan 47(1): 1-31.
  • Terayama M. 2009. A synopsis of the family Formicidae of Taiwan (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Research Bulletin of Kanto Gakuen University. Liberal Arts 17:81-266.
  • Terayama M., S. Kubota, and K. Eguchi. 2014. Encyclopedia of Japanese ants. Asakura Shoten: Tokyo, 278 pp.
  • Terayama, M. 2009. A synopsis of the family Formicidae of Taiwan (Insecta; Hymenoptera). The Research Bulletin of Kanto Gakuen University 17: 81-266.
  • Tiwari R. N. 1999. Taxonomic studies on ants of southern India (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Memoirs of the Zoological Survey of India 18(4): 1-96.
  • Tiwari R.N., B.G. Kundu, S. Roychowdhury, S.N. Ghosh. 1999. Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Pp. 211-294 in: Director; Zoological Survey of India (ed.) 1999. Fauna of West Bengal. Part 8. Insecta (Trichoptera, Thysanoptera, Neuroptera, Hymenoptera and Anoplura). Calcutta: Zoological Survey of India, iv + 442 pp.
  • Tiwari R.N., B.G. Kundu, S. Sheela, and S. N. Ghosh. 2004. Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Alfred, J.R.B. [Ed.], Fauna of Manipur, part - 2 (insects). State fauna series 10. Zool.Surv.India.i-v, 1-625. Chapter pagination: 605-625.
  • Tiwari, R.N. 1999. Taxonomic studies on ants of southern India (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Memoirs of the Zoological Survey of India 18(4):1-96
  • Wang W. R., S. Q. Zhang, and Z. H. Xu. 2012. A faunistic and taxonomic study of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Shenzhen Municipality. Journal of Southwest Forestry University 32(1): 64-73.
  • Wheeler W. M. 1909. Ants of Formosa and the Philippines. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 26: 333-345.
  • Wheeler W. M. 1919. The ants of Borneo. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 63:43-147.
  • Wheeler W. M. 1929. Ants collected by Professor F. Silvestri in Formosa, the Malay Peninsula and the Philippines. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Zoologia Generale e Agraria della Reale Scuola Superiore d'Agricoltura. Portici 24: 27-64.
  • Wheeler W. M. 1930. A list of the known Chinese ants. Peking Natural History Bulletin 5: 53-81.
  • Wheeler W. M. 1930. Formosan ants collected by Dr. R. Takahashi. Proceedings of the New England Zoological Club 11: 93-106.
  • Yamane S. 2016. How many species of Ants in Amami Islands? (in Japanese). Part 2, chapter 1 in How many species of Ants in Amami Islands? Pp. 92-132.
  • Yamane S., S. Ikudome, and M. Terayama. 1999. Identification guide to the Aculeata of the Nansei Islands, Japan. Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press, xii + 831 pp. pp, 138-317.
  • Yamane S.; Ikudome, S.; Terayama, M. 1999. Identification guide to the Aculeata of the Nansei Islands, Japan. Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press, xii + 831 pp. pp138-317.
Retrieved from "https://antwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Erromyrma_latinodis&oldid=724402"