Camponotus quadrinotatus

AntWiki: The Ants --- Online
Camponotus quadrinotatus
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hymenoptera
Family: Formicidae
Subfamily: Formicinae
Tribe: Camponotini
Genus: Camponotus
Species: C. quadrinotatus
Binomial name
Camponotus quadrinotatus
Forel, 1886

Camponotus quadrinotatus casent0008641 p 1 high.jpg

Camponotus quadrinotatus casent0008641 d 1 high.jpg

Specimen Labels

Synonyms


Common Name
Yotsuboshi-oo-ari
Language: Japanese

An arboreal species that nests in bark or crevices in tree trunks of coniferous and mixed forests. During a field survey in India, Dhadwal & Bharti (2023) report this species was collected from Solang, Himachal Pradesh. The nest was found under the stone, the colony was small and having few minor workers only. The area is mostly surrounded by Deodar and Pine trees, with an average daily temperature of 28°C.

Identification

Japanese Ant Image Database - Total length of workers around 5 - 6 mm. Body black; pronotum brownish in many individuals. First and 2nd gastral terga each with a pair of yellowish spots. Metanotal groove not incised dorsally; petiole with hairs.

Dhadwal & Bharti (2023) - Camponotus quarinotatus resembles Camponotus keihitoi, but both species can be easily distinguished by the following combination of characters:

  • C. keihitoi (minor worker)
    • the metanotal depression is distinct
    • pilosity is absent on the mesosoma and the petiole
    • the clypeal margin is transverse anteriorly
  • C. quarinotatus (minor worker)
    • the metanotal depression is indistinct
    • the mesosoma and the petiole are pilose
    • the clypeal margin is convex anteriorly

Keys including this Species

Distribution

Latitudinal Distribution Pattern

Latitudinal Range: 38.283333° to 30°.

   
North
Temperate
North
Subtropical
Tropical South
Subtropical
South
Temperate

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists

Oriental Region: India.
Palaearctic Region: China, Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, Japan (type locality), Republic of Korea, Russian Federation.

Distribution based on AntMaps

AntMapLegend.png

Distribution based on AntWeb specimens

Check data from AntWeb

Countries Occupied

Number of countries occupied by this species based on AntWiki Regional Taxon Lists. In general, fewer countries occupied indicates a narrower range, while more countries indicates a more widespread species.
pChart

Estimated Abundance

Relative abundance based on number of AntMaps records per species (this species within the purple bar). Fewer records (to the left) indicates a less abundant/encountered species while more records (to the right) indicates more abundant/encountered species.
pChart


Biology

Castes

  • Dhadwal & Bharti, 2023, Fig. 15. Camponotus quadrinotatus, minor worker (PUAC T107). A. Head in full face view. B. Body in profile view. C. Body in dorsal view.

Nomenclature

The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's Online Catalogue of the Ants of the World.

  • quadrinotatus. Camponotus marginatus var. quadrinotatus Forel, 1886f: 142 (s.w.q.) JAPAN.
    • Type-material: syntype major and minor workers, syntype queens (numbers not stated).
    • Type-locality: Japan: (no further data) (Dönitz).
    • Type-depository: MNHU (perhaps also MHNG).
    • Santschi, 1925f: 89 (m.).
    • Combination in C. (Myrmentoma): Emery, 1925b: 118.
    • As unavailable (infrasubspecific) name: Emery, 1896d: 373 (in list); Emery, 1925b: 118; Teranishi, 1940: 26.
    • Subspecies of fallax: Forel, 1907e: 19.
    • Subspecies of caryae: Wheeler, W.M. 1917c: 29; Wheeler, W.M. 1921c: 544; Santschi, 1925f: 89; Wheeler, W.M. 1928d: 118; Wheeler, W.M. 1929f: 10; Wheeler, W.M. 1930h: 76; Morisita, 1945: 22; Azuma, 1951: 89; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 234; Azuma, 1953: 5; Azuma, 1955: 80; Onoyama, 1980: 201; Tang, J., Li, et al. 1995: 114 (error).
    • Subspecies of marginatus: Dalla Torre, 1893: 242; Forel, 1900e: 270; Ruzsky, 1905b: 249; Wheeler, W.M. 1906c: 326; Yano, 1910: 422; Ruzsky, 1925b: 42; Kuznetsov-Ugamsky, 1928b: 5; Kuznetsov-Ugamsky, 1929a: 18; Ruzsky, 1946: 69.
    • Status as species: Ruzsky, 1926: 109; Collingwood, 1976: 307; Azuma, 1977: 116; Collingwood, 1981: 29; Wang, C., Xiao & Wu, 1989a: 222 (in key); Wang, C., Xiao & Wu, 1989b: 327; Kupyanskaya, 1990: 173; Morisita, et al. 1991: 43; Wang, C. & Wu, 1994: 29 (in key); Bolton, 1995b: 119; Wu, J. & Wang, 1995: 176; Radchenko, 1996b: 1199 (in key); Radchenko, 1997b: 704; Terayama, 1999b: 30 (in key); Imai, et al. 2003: 36; Radchenko, 2005b: 160; Ran & Zhou, 2011: 69; Guénard & Dunn, 2012: 29; Dhadwal & Bharti, 2023d: 25.
    • Senior synonym of nigricolor: Kuznetsov-Ugamsky, 1929a: 18; Bolton, 1995b: 119; Radchenko, 1997b: 704.
    • Senior synonym of rubicolor: Radchenko, 1997b: 704.
    • Distribution: China, India, Japan, Korean Peninsula, Russia.
  • nigricolor. Camponotus quadrinotatus var. nigricolor Ruzsky, 1926: 109.
    • [First available use of Camponotus marginatus subsp. quadrinotatus var. nigricolor Ruzsky, 1925b: 42 (w.) RUSSIA; unavailable (infrasubspecific) name.]
    • Type-material: syntype workers (number not stated).
    • Type-localities: Russia: Siberia, Primorsky obl, Kozlovsk, Ussuri river, 8.viii.1916 (M. Ruzsky), Russia: Valdivostok, 10.viii.1916 (M. Ruzsky), Russia: Siberia, Khabarovsk, slope to Amur river, 11.vii.1916 (M. Ruzsky).
    • [Note: only the Kozlovsk locality is mentioned in the original Ruzsky, 1925b: 42 (unavailable ) description; the other two localities are from Ruzsky, 1926: 109.]
    • Type-depository: ZMUM.
    • Junior synonym of quadrinotatus: Kuznetsov-Ugamsky, 1929a: 18; Bolton, 1995b: 113; Radchenko, 1997b: 704.
  • rubicolor. Camponotus marginatus morpha rubicolor Ruzsky, 1925b: 42 (w.) RUSSIA.
    • Type-material: syntype workers (number not stated).
    • Type-localities: Russia: Siberia, Khabarovsk, 3.viii.1916 (M. Ruzsky), Russia: Siberia, Utesnaya, Shilke river, 27.vii.1916 (M. Ruzsky).
    • Type-depository: ZMUM.
    • [Also described as new by Ruzsky, 1926: 109.]
    • Subspecies of aethiops: Bolton, 1995b: 121.
    • Junior synonym of quadrinotatus: Radchenko, 1997b: 704.
  • rubripes ‘Formica rubripes Drury’, sensu Roger, 1863b: 2, and ‘Formica rubripes Drury, 1770’, sensu Forel, 1886f: 143, and subsequent authors. Misinterpretation.
    • [Notes (i): Drury, 1770, contains no reference to ants, but was nevertheless cited by Forel, 1886f: 143, as the authority for the name rubripes. In reality, Drury, 1773: 72, described, but did not name, an ant species from Sierra Leone, which he considered to be the same as Formica barbara Linnaeus, 1767: 962, saying: “Vide Linn. Syst. p. 962, No. 2 Form. Barbara, which I judge to be the same as this”. This misidentified material was later named Formica rubripes by Latreille, 1802c (above); (ii) Emery, 1891b: 17, recognised the confusion caused by Roger and Forel, and explained: “Drury n’a jamais donné le nom de rubripes à aucune fourmis; c’est Latreille qui, le premier, appela Formica rubripes un gros Camponotus d’Afrique que Drury avait rapporté à tort au Formica barbara de Linné”.]
    • Combination in Camponotus: Roger, 1863b: 2.
    • Status as species: Roger, 1863b: 2; Mayr, 1865: 27; Forel, 1886f: 143; Emery, 1887a: 212 (footnote); Emery, 1888c: 365; Forel, 1889: 261; Emery, 1889b: 510; Mayr, 1889: 278; Forel, 1890a: lxi; Saunders, E. 1890: 202 (misinterpretations).

Unless otherwise noted the text for the remainder of this section is reported from the publication that includes the original description.

Description

Worker

Minor Dhadwal & Bharti (2023) - (n = 4) - HL 1.35–1.62; HW 1.14–1.26; EL 0.33–0.39; SL 1.35–1.59; PW 0.96–1.05; WL 1.95–2.25; MTL 1.20–1.25; HTL 1.53–1.62; PL 0.48–0.60; PH 0.58–0.66; GL 2.01–2.43; TL 5.79–6.90; CI 77–84; SI 118–126; REL 24–25; PrI 83–84.

Habitus. In full-face view, head subrectangular, longer than broad (CI 77–84) with convex posterior margin and subparallel lateral margins; clypeus carinate in the middle, clypeus margin anteriorly convex; mandibles with 5 teeth; eyes moderate in size, placed laterally over the mid-length of the head; antennae long, slender and 12-segmented, scape long (SI 118–126), surpassing posterior head margin by half of its length. In dorsal view, mesosoma broad and pronotum narrow (PrI 83–84) anteriorly; pro-mesonotal suture distinct and metanotal groove absent; mesonotum and propodeum compressed laterally; mesosoma does not form a single convexity in lateral view, convexity interrupted at propodeum being truncate; propodeal declivity steep and slightly concave; propodeal spiracle slit-like, placed below the level of propodeal declivity; petiole thick and biconvex; tibiae cylindrical; gaster subglobose.

Sculpture. Head, mesosoma and gaster minutely reticulated and shiny; mandibles rugose.

Pilosity and pubescence. Body sparsely pilose, with a few erect hairs on the vertex of the head, mesosoma, petiole and gaster; tibiae lacking a row of spiny bristles on the ventral edge, and with 3–4 suberect setae near apical spurs.

Colouration. Head, mesosoma and gaster black; in some workers 1st and 2nd gastral tergites having each a pair of yellowish or whitish markings, and the rest completely black.

References

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

  • Azuma M. 1953. On the myrmecological fauna of Mt. Rokko, Hyogo Prefecture. Warera 2:1-7.
  • Azuma M. 1955. A list of ants (Formicidae) from Hokkaido Is. Hyogo Biology 3:79-80.
  • Choi B.-M. 1987. Taxonomic study on ants (Formicidae) in Korea (1). On the genus Monomorium. Journal of the Institute of Science Education (Cheongju National Teachers' College) 11:17-30.
  • Choi B.M. 1985. Study on distribution of ants (Formicidae) from Korea (1). Formic fauna in Mt. Songni. Cheongju Sabom Taehak Nonmunjip (Journal of Cheongju National Teachers' College) 22:401-437.
  • Choi B.M. 1986. Studies on the distribution of ants (Formicidae) in Korea. Journal of Chongju National Teacher College 23: 317-386.
  • Choi B.M. 1996. Studies on the distribution of ants (Formicidae) in Korea (15) -Ant fauna islands Ullungdo and Dokdo. Journal of Chongju National University of Education 33: 201-219.
  • Choi B.M. 1998. Distribution of ants (Formicidae) in Korea (19) Ants fauna from Chungcheongbukdo Province. Cheongju Tea. Coll. 35: 213-266.
  • Choi B.M., Bang, J.R. 1992. Studies on the distribution of ants (Formicidae) in Korea (9). Ant fauna in Mt. Togyusan. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology 31:101-112.
  • Choi B.M., K. Ogata, and M. Terayama. 1993. Comparative studies of ant faunas of Korea and Japan. 1. Faunal comparison among islands of Southern Korean and northern Kyushu, Japan. Bull. Biogeogr. Soc. Japan 48(1): 37-49.
  • Choi B.M., Kim, C.H., Bang, J.R. 1993. Studies on the distribution of ants (Formicidae) in Korea (13). A checklist of ants from each province (Do), with taxonomic notes. Cheongju Sabom Taehakkyo Nonmunjip (Journal of Cheongju National University of Education) 30: 331-380.
  • Choi B.M., and H.S. Lee. 1999. Studies on the distribution ants in Korea (21) - Ant fauna in Kwanaksan. Korean J. Soil Zoology 4(1): 1-4.
  • Choi B.M., and J. R. Bang. Studies on the distribution of ants (Formicidae) in Korea (12): the analysis of ant communities in 23 islands. Journal of Cheongju National University of Education 30:317-330.
  • Collingwood C. A. 1981. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Korea, 2. Folia Entomologica Hungarica 42(34): 25-30.
  • Forel A. 1907. Formiciden aus dem Naturhistorischen Museum in Hamburg. II. Teil. Neueingänge seit 1900. Mitt. Naturhist. Mus. Hambg. 24: 1-20.
  • Guénard B., and R. R. Dunn. 2012. A checklist of the ants of China. Zootaxa 3558: 1-77.
  • Harada Y., D. Fukukura, R. Kurisu, and S. Yamane. 2013. Ants of Ports, monitoring of alien ant species. Bull. Biogeogr. Soc. Japan 68: 29-40.
  • Hayashida K. 1957. Ecological distribution of ants in Sapporo and vicinity. (Preliminary report.). Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University. Series VI. Zoology 13:173-177.
  • Hayashida K. 1961. Studies on the ecological distribution of ants in Sapporo and its vicinity (1 et 2). Insectes Sociaux 7: 125-162.
  • Hayashida K. 1971. Vertical distribution of ants in the southern part of the Hidaka mountains. [In Japanese.]. Memoirs of the National Science Museum (Tokyo) 4:29-38.
  • Hosoishi S. 2006. Ant fauna of Noko Island. pp99-107. In: The floristic and faunistic surveys of the Noko Island.
  • Ikeshita Y., A. Gotoh, K. Yamamoto, N. Taniguchi, and F. Ito. 2007. Ants collected in Mt. Linoyama, Marugame, Kagawa Prefecture (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Kagawa Seibutsu 34: 59-62.
  • Kim B.J. 1996. Synonymic list and distribution of Formicidae (Hymenoptera) in Korea. Entomological Research Bulletin Supplement 169-196.
  • Kim B.J., S.J. Park, and J.H. Kim. 1996. Ants from Naejangsan national park (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Korean J. Soil. Zoology &(2): 120-133.
  • Kim et al. 1993. Systematic study of ants from Chejudo Province. Koran Journal of Entomology 23(3): 117-141.
  • Kubota S., and M. Terayama. 1982. Ant fauna of Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan (IV) Ants of Kakio. Kanagawa-chuho (Journal of the Kanagawa Entomologists Association) 21-28.
  • Kubota. S., and M. Terayama. 1988. Ant fauna of Tokyo. (1) A list of ants collected at the parks. ARI Reports of the Myrmecologists Society (Japan) 16: 14-16
  • Kwon T.S., C. M. Lee, J. H. Chun, J. H. Sung, and S. K. Kim. 2011. Ants in Hongneung forest. Korea Forest Research Institute, 92 pages.
  • Lee T. L., and Y. S. Wei. 2005.. Study for the temporal and spatial variation of the ant assemblages as the biological indicator in national parks. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 4(4): 491-496.
  • Morisita M. 1945. Ants of the southern part of Hokkaido, Japan. [In Japanese.] Mushi 16:21-28. 
  • Natuhara Y. 1998. Ant faunae in Osaka City and three other sites in Osake Prefecture. Bulletin of Myrmecological Society of Japan 22: 1-5.
  • Ochi K. 1983. Distribution pattern of ants in pine stands, with special reference to Monomorium nipponense Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Gensei 44:1-6.
  • Ogata. K., Touyama, Y. and Choi, B. M. 1994. Ant fauna of Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. ARI Reports of the Myrmecologists Society (Japan) 18: 18-25
  • Paik W.H. 1984. A checklist of Formicidae (Hymenoptera) of Korea. Korean J. Plant Prot. 23(3): 193-195.
  • Park S. H., S. Hosoishi, K. Ogata, and Y. Kuboki. 2014. Clustering of ant communities and indicator species analysis using self-organizing maps. Comptes Rendus Biologies http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2014.07.003
  • Park S.J., and B.J. Kim. 2002. Faunal comparison of ants among Cheongsando and other islands of South Sea in Korea. Korean Journal of Entomology 32(1): 7-12.
  • Park, Seong, Joon and Byung, and Kim, Jin. 2002. Faunal Comparison of Ants among Cheongsando and Other Islands of South Sea in Korea. Korean Jornal of Entomology. 32(1):7-12.
  • Radchenko, A. 2005. Monographic revision of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of North Korea. Annales Zoologici (Warsaw) 55: 127-221.
  • Ran H., and S. Y. Zhou. 2011. Checklist of Chinese Ants: the Formicomorph Subfamilies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) (I). Journal of Guangxi Normal University: Natural Science Edition. 29(3): 65-73.
  • Ruzsky M. 1946. Ants of Tomsk province and contiguous localities. Trudy Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta 97: 69-72.
  • Sakai H. 2002. Reproductive flight season of Japanese ants. Ari 26: 33-39.
  • Santschi F. 1925. Contribution à la faune myrmécologique de la Chine. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 56: 81-96.
  • Tang J., Li S., Huang E., Zhang B. and Chen Y.. 1995. Hymenoptera: Formicidae (1). Economic Insect Fauna of China 47: 1-133.
  • Tang Jue, Li Shen, Huang Enyou, Zhang Benyue. 1985. Notes on ants from Zhoushan islands , Zhejiang (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Chekianensis 11(3): 307-318.
  • Tang Jue, Li Shen, Huang Enyou, Zhang Benyue. 1985. Notes on ants from Zhoushan Islands Zhejiang (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).  Journal of Zhejiang University (Agric.& Life Sci.) 3.
  • Terayama M. 1977. Checklist of the known ants of Saitama Prefecture. Insects and nature 12(4): 26-27
  • Terayama M. 1992. Structure of ant communities in East Asia. A. Regional differences and species richness. Bulletin of the Bio-geographical Society of Japan 47: 1-31.
  • Terayama M. 2001. Ants of the Institute for Nature study in Minato-ku, Tokyo: species composition, relative nest abundance, and nest density. Rept. Inst. Nat. Stu. 33: 289-300.
  • Terayama M. 2005. Ants from the Akasaka Imperial Gardens, Tokyo. Mem. Natn. Sci. Mus., Tokyo 39: 239-243.
  • Terayama M., Choi, B.M., Kim, C.H. 1992. A check list of ants from Korea, with taxonomic notes. Bulletin of the Toho Gakuen 7:19-54.
  • Terayama M., K. Ogata, and B.M. Choi. 1994. Distribution records of ants in 47 prefectures of Japan. Ari (report of the Myrmecologists Society of Japan) 18: 5-17.
  • Terayama M., S. Kubota, and K. Eguchi. 2014. Encyclopedia of Japanese ants. Asakura Shoten: Tokyo, 278 pp.
  • Teruyama. M. 1988. Ant fauna of Saitama Prefecture, Japan. ARI Reports of the Myrmecologists Society (Japan) 16: 4-13
  • Togashi I., and M. Terayama. 2010. Ant fauna of Hegurajima and Nanatsujima islands, Ishikawa Prefecture. Bull. Biogeoger. Soc. Japan 65: 195-196.
  • Wang C., Xiao G. and Wu J.. 1989. Taxonomic studies on the genus Camponotus in China (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) (conclusion). Forest Research 2: 221-228
  • Wheeler W. M. 1906. The ants of Japan. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 22: 301-328.
  • Wheeler W. M. 1928. Ants collected by Professor F. Silvestri in Japan and Korea. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Zoologia Generale e Agraria della Reale Scuola Superiore d'Agricoltura. Portici 22: 96-125.
  • Wheeler W. M. 1930. A list of the known Chinese ants. Peking Natural History Bulletin 5: 53-81.
  • Wu Z. W., X. D. Bi, X. He, Z. X. Lu, L. J. Wei, and Y. Q Chen. 2015. Impact of continuous fire disturbance on ground-dwelling ant communities in arid-hot valleys of Panzhihua, Sichuan. Journal of Yunnan University 37(3): 467-474.
  • Yamane S., Y. Harada, and K. Eguchi. 2013. Classification and ecology of ants. Natural history of ants in Southern Kyushu. 200 pages
  • Yamazaki K., and K. Takakura. 2011. Fauna of Mandai-ike Park in Osaka City. Osaka Tatsuwa Department of Research report (?????????) 73: 75-87.