Dorylus labiatus

AntWiki: The Ants --- Online
Dorylus labiatus
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hymenoptera
Family: Formicidae
Subfamily: Dorylinae
Genus: Dorylus
Species: D. labiatus
Binomial name
Dorylus labiatus
Shuckard, 1840

Dorylus labiatus casent0901950 p 1 high.jpg

Dorylus labiatus casent0901950 d 1 high.jpg

Specimen Labels

Synonyms

These are highly subterranean ants that are rarely seen above ground. They are most commonly seen foraging on the surface only after heavy rains.

Photo Gallery

  • Dorylus labiatus workers from central India. The worker caste in this genus is polymorphic, thus the size variation between these workers. Photo by Kalesh Sadasivan.

Identification

HW 1.13-2.30 mm. A large, polymorphic species. Antenna always 11-segmented. Concolorous brownish yellow. Very similar to Dorylus fulvus. (Wilson 1964)

Distribution

Latitudinal Distribution Pattern

Latitudinal Range: 32.474167° to 22.29972222°.

   
North
Temperate 		North
Subtropical 		Tropical South
Subtropical 		South
Temperate

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists

Oriental Region: Bangladesh, India (type locality), Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka.
Palaearctic Region: China.

Distribution based on AntMaps

AntMapLegend.png

Distribution based on AntWeb specimens

Check data from AntWeb

Countries Occupied

Number of countries occupied by this species based on AntWiki Regional Taxon Lists. In general, fewer countries occupied indicates a narrower range, while more countries indicates a more widespread species.
pChart

Estimated Abundance

Relative abundance based on number of AntMaps records per species (this species within the purple bar). Fewer records (to the left) indicates a less abundant/encountered species while more records (to the right) indicates more abundant/encountered species.
pChart

Biology

Castes

Images from AntWeb

Dorylus labiatus casent0901950 p 2 high.jpgDorylus labiatus casent0901950 p 3 high.jpg
Type of Dorylus labiatus. Male (alate). Specimen code casent0901950. Photographer Ryan Perry, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by OUM, Oxford, UK.
Dorylus labiatus casent0902695 p 1 high.jpgDorylus labiatus casent0902695 h 1 high.jpgDorylus labiatus casent0902695 d 1 high.jpgDorylus labiatus casent0902695 l 1 high.jpgDorylus labiatus casent0902695 p 2 high.jpgDorylus labiatus casent0902695 p 3 high.jpg
Holotype of Dorylus hindostanus. Male (alate). Specimen code casent0902695. Photographer Z. Lieberman, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by NHMUK, London, UK.
Wilson 1964 Army Ant fig 1-14

Nomenclature

The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's Online Catalogue of the Ants of the World.

  • labiatus. Dorylus labiatus Shuckard, 1840c: 319 (m.) INDIA (Maharashtra, Assam).
    • Type-material: syntype males (number not stated).
    • Type-localities: India: Poonah, Bombay Presidency (Sykes), and India: Assam (Cantor).
    • Type-depositories: BMNH, OXUM.
    • Forel, 1901a: 464 (w.).
    • Combination in D. (Typhlopone): Emery, 1895j: 724.
    • Junior synonym of juvenculus: Emery, 1888b: 350; Dalla Torre, 1893: 11.
    • Subspecies of fulvus: Emery, 1895j: 724; Santschi, 1931d: 408.
    • Status as species: Westwood, 1842: 80; Smith, F. 1859b: 2; Mayr, 1863: 408; Roger, 1863b: 41; Smith, F. 1871a: 335; Dalla Torre, 1893: 12; Emery, 1895j: 724; Forel, 1901a: 464; Bingham, 1903: 2; Forel, 1906b: 90; Emery, 1910b: 13; Menozzi, 1939a: 326; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 10; Wilson, 1964a: 440; Pisarski, 1970: 305; Bolton, 1995b: 179; Guénard & Dunn, 2012: 26; Bharti, Guénard, et al. 2016: 22; Rasheed, et al. 2019: 428.
    • Senior synonym of hindostanus: Emery, 1895j: 724; Forel, 1901a: 464; Bingham, 1903: 2; Emery, 1910b: 13; Wilson, 1964a: 440; Pisarski, 1970: 305; Bolton, 1995b: 179.
    • Senior synonym of laeviceps: Forel, 1901a: 464; Bingham, 1903: 2; Emery, 1910b: 13; Wilson, 1964a: 440; Pisarski, 1970: 305; Bolton, 1995b: 179.
    • Distribution: Afghanistan, India, Pakistan.
  • hindostanus. Dorylus hindostanus Smith, F. 1859b: 3, pl. 1, fig. 1, 16 (m.) INDIA (Punjab).
    • Type-material: holotype male.
    • Type-locality: India: Punjab.
    • Type-depository: BMNH.
    • Status as species: Mayr, 1863: 408; Roger, 1863b: 41; Smith, F. 1871a: 335; Dalla Torre, 1893: 11.
    • Junior synonym of juvenculus: Emery, 1888b: 350; Dalla Torre, 1893: 12.
    • Junior synonym of labiatus: Emery, 1895j: 724; Forel, 1901a: 464; Bingham, 1903: 2; Emery, 1910b: 13; Wilson, 1964a: 440; Pisarski, 1970: 305; Bolton, 1995b: 179.
  • laeviceps. Dorylus (Typhlopone) laeviceps Smith, F. 1878b: 13, fig. 2 (w.) PAKISTAN.
    • Type-material: holotype(?) worker.
    • [Note: no indication of number of specimens is given.]
    • Type-locality: Pakistan: Jhilam Valley, vii. (F. Stoliczka).
    • Type-depository: unknown (type-material lost).
    • [Misspelled as leviceps by Dalla Torre, 1893: 12.]
    • Status as species: Dalla Torre, 1893: 12.
    • Junior synonym of fulvus: Emery, 1895j: 723.
    • Junior synonym of labiatus: Forel, 1901a: 464; Bingham, 1903: 2; Emery, 1910b: 13; Wilson, 1964a: 440; Pisarski, 1970: 305; Bolton, 1995b: 179.


Description

Worker

Major

Bingham (1903): Castaneous yellow, highly polished, smooth and shining, the head, thorax and abdomen with minute scattered punctures, the head beneath near the mandibles and the apex of the abdomen with a few erect yellow hairs. Head rectangular, much longer than broad, and broader in front than posteriorly, the occiput widely emarginate; clypeus narrow, transverse; antennal carinae impressed line on the head. Thorax rectangular, depressed, slightly constricted at the pro-mesonotal suture: legs robust, short. Node of pedicel longer than broad; abdomen elongate, massive.

Length: 6.8 mm


Minor

Bingham (1903): Similar, smaller, lighter in colour.

Length: 2.5 - 4 mm


Male

Bingham (1903): Brownish yellow, the head, except the mandibles, and the antennae blaci<, the legs darker than the body, the coxae castaneous brown; the head, the coxae, the apex of the metanotum and of the pedicel, and the apical abdominal segment covered with long yellowish curly hair, the rest of the body with a very short, thin, fine, recumbent, pale pubescence; wings hyaline with a brownish tint. Head much broader than long, the vertex raised, the ocelli prominent; the mandibles long, sickle-shaped, bearing at base on the inside a rounded tubercle. Thorax massive, very gibbous in front, the mesonotum with a short longitudinal carina above the base of the wings on each side; scutellum large, prominent; postscutellum narrow, sunk between the scutellum and metanotum, the latter truncate posteriorly. Node of the pedicel longer than broad, with a strong gnomon-shaped keel beneath, convex above; legs moderately long, very smooth, polished and shining; abdomen cylindrical, long, twice the length of the head and thorax united, clavate towards the apex and slightly curved downwards.

Length: 30 - 33 mm


Shuckard (1840): Pale brown, inclining to fuscous, with lung curling hair upon the face, beneath the coxae, and at the apex of the abdomen: head black, except the antennae and mandibles, which are castaneous; face slightly tuberculated a little to the side and in front of the posterior ocelli; forehead not unusually prominent; ocelli large and disposed in an obtuse triangle on the vertex, the posterior placed on the posterior declivity of the head, closely behind the summit, and these distant not more than the diameter of one from the anterior, in front of which the face is deeply sulcated; eyes very prominent and subglobose, the scape less than one-third the length of the organ; mandibles long and slender, slightly curved, broadest at the base, whence they immediately attenuate, their return in front equal throughout; the clypeus furnished between the base of the antennae with a long flock of curling hair, and the labrum with a pair of large round compressed tubercles.

Thorax gibbous in front and at the scutellum, the latter transverse and rounded; metathorax elongate, abruptly truncated at its apex, where it is fringed; mesothorax slightly corrugated in front on each side of the two abbreviated parallel longitudinal central lines, the wrinkles parallel with the suture that separates it from the prothorax: wings subhyaline, their nervures dark brown, the radial nervure distinctly ex. tending opposite and rather beyond the inner angle of the marginal cell, where it terminates abruptly, the cubital nervure slightly undulated as far as the insertion of the recurrent nervure, beyond which to the termination of the cell it is straight and inserted at half the length of the first submarginal cell; legs castaneous, femora elongate triangular, acuminated towards the apex, the outline beneath not perceptibly rounded downwards; the trochanters of the four posterior not strictly adhering, and projecting a little beyond the lower outline of the femora.

Abdomen elongate, cylindrical, rather slender, the peduncle subquadrate or rather subglobose (its ventral portion viewed laterally angulated but hooked backwards), slightly fringed below its apex, not so broad as the following segment, which with the next is transverse, the terminal segment very pilose.

References

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

  • Aslam M., F. Asif Shaheen, and A. Ayyaz. 2006. Management of Callosobruchus chinensis Linnaeus in stored chickpea through interspecific and intraspecific predation by ants. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2(1): 85-89.
  • Bharti H. 2001. Check list of ants from north-west India I. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology 21(2): 163-167.
  • Bharti H. 2003.Ants and forensic entomology. ANeT Newsletter 6: 18-20.
  • Bharti H., Y. P. Sharma, M. Bharti, and M. Pfeiffer. 2013. Ant species richness, endemicity and functional groups, along an elevational gradient in the Himalayas. Asian Myrmecology 5: 79-101.
  • Bharti H., Y. P. Sharma, and A. Kaur. 2009. Seasonal patterns of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Punjab Shivalik. Halteres 1(1): 36-47.
  • Bhoje P. M., K. Shilpa, and T. V. Sathe. 2014. Diversity of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Kolhapur district of Maharashtra, India. Uttar Pradesh J. Zool. 34(1): 23-25.
  • Chhotani O. B., and K. K. Ray. 1976. Fauna of Rajasthan, India, Hymenoptera. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 71: 13-49.
  • Dad J. M., S. A. Akbar, H. Bharti, and A. A. Wachkoo. 2019. Community structure and ant species diversity across select sites ofWestern Ghats, India. Acta Ecologica Sinica 39: 219–228.
  • Dias R. K. S., K. R. K. A. Kosgamage, and H. A. W. S. Peiris. 2012. The Taxonomy and Conservation Status of Ants (Order: Hymenoptera, Family: Formicidae) in Sri Lanka. In: The National Red List 2012 of Sri Lanka; Conservation Status of the Fauna and Flora. Weerakoon, D.K. & S. Wijesundara Eds., Ministry of Environment, Colombo, Sri Lanka. p11-19.
  • Emery C. 1887. Catalogo delle formiche esistenti nelle collezioni del Museo Civico di Genova. Parte terza. Formiche della regione Indo-Malese e dell'Australia (continuazione e fine). [concl.]. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. 25(5): 427-473.
  • Field Museum Collection, Chicago, Illinois (C. Moreau)
  • Forel A. 1901. Les Formicides de l'Empire des Indes et de Ceylan. Part VIII. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 13: 462-477
  • Forel A. 1906. Les fourmis de l'Himalaya. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 42: 79-94.
  • Ghosh S. N., S. Sheela, B. G. Kundu, S. Roychowdhury, and R. N. Tiwari. 2006. Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Pp. 369-398 in: Alfred, J. R. B. (ed.) 2006. Fauna of Arunachal Pradesh. (Part -2). [State Fauna Series 13.]. New Delhi: Zoological Survey of India, iv + 518 pp.
  • Kumar D., and M. Archana. 2008. Ant community variation in urban and agricultural ecosystems in Vadodara District (Gujarat State), western India. Asian Myrmecology 2: 85-93.
  • Pajni H. R., and R. K. Suri. 1978. First report on the Formicid fauna (Hymenoptera) of Chandigarh. Res. Bull. (Science) Punjab University 29: 5-12.
  • Rajagopal T., S. P. Sevarkodiyone, and A. Manimozhi. 2005. Ant diversity in some selected localities of Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar district, Tamil Nadu. Zoos' Print Journal 20(6): 1887-1888.
  • Rasheed M. T., I. Bodlah, A. G. Fareen, A. A. Wachkoo, X. Huang, and S. A. Akbar. 2019. A checklist of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Pakistan. Sociobiology 66(3): 426-439.
  • Tak N. 1995. Studies on ants (Formicidae) of Rajasthan - 1 Jodhpur. Hexapoda 7(1): 17-28.
  • Tak N. 2008. Ants of Rajasthan. Conserving Biodiversity of Rajasthan Zool. Surv. India. 149-155.
  • Tak N. 2009. Ants Formicidae of Rajasthan. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper No. 288, iv, 46 p
  • Tak N. 2010. Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Zool. Surv. India, Fauna of Ranthambore National Park, Conservation Area Series 43: 133-144.
  • Tak N., N. S. Rathore, and S. Kumar. 2007. Insecta: Hymenoptera. Fauna of Pichhola lake (Rajasthan). Wetland Ecosystem series. Zool. Surv. India. 8 : 127-130.
  • Tak N., and N. S. Rathore. 1996. Ant (Formicidae) fauna of the Thar Desert. Pp. 271-276 in: Ghosh, A. K.; Baqri, Q. H.; Prakash, I. (eds.) 1996. Faunal diversity in the Thar Desert: gaps in research. Jodhpur: Scientific Publishers, xi + 410 pp.
  • Tak N., and N. S. Rathore. 2004. Insecta: Hymenoptera. Rathore, N.S. Fauna of Desert National Park Rajasthan (proposed biosphere reserve). Conservation Area Series 19,Zool. Surv. India. 1-135. Chapter pagination: 81-84.
  • Tak N., and N. S. Rathore. 2004. Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae. State Fauna Series 8: Fauna of Gujarat. Zool. Surv. India. Pp. 161-183.
  • Tak N., and S. L. Kazmi. 2011. On a collection of Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae from Uttarakhand. Rec. zool. Surv. India : 111(2) : 39-49.
  • Tak, N. 2009. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Thar Desert of Rajasthan and Gujarat. in C. Sivaperuman et al. (eds.), Faunal Ecology and Conservation of the Great Indian Desert
  • Thapa V. K. 2000. An Inventory of Nepal's Insects, Vol. III. IUCN Nepal, Kathmandu, xi + 475 pp.
  • Tiwari R. N. 1997. Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Pp. 441-451 in: Zoological Survey of India; Director (ed.) 1997. Fauna of Delhi. Calcutta: Zoological Survey of India, vi + 903 pp.
  • Tiwari R. N., B. G. Kundu, S. Roy Chowdhury, and S. N. Ghosh. 2003. Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Fauna of Sikkim. Part 4. State Fauna Series. 9.Zool.Surv.India. i-iii, 1-512. Chapter pagination: 467-506.
  • Tiwari R.N., B.G. Kundu, S. Sheela, and S. N. Ghosh. 2004. Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Alfred, J.R.B. [Ed.], Fauna of Manipur, part - 2 (insects). State fauna series 10. Zool.Surv.India.i-v, 1-625. Chapter pagination: 605-625.
  • Varghese T. 2004. Taxonomic studies on ant genera of the Indian Institute of Science campus with notes on their nesting habits. Pp. 485-502 in : Rajmohana, K.; Sudheer, K.; Girish Kumar, P.; Santhosh, S. (eds.) 2004. Perspectives on biosystematics and biodiversity. Prof. T.C. Narendran commemoration volume. Kerala: Systematic Entomology Research Scholars Association, xxii + 666 pp.
Retrieved from "https://antwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Dorylus_labiatus&oldid=698930"