.jpg){kind=logo}
Discothyrea gaia
| Discothyrea gaia | |
|---|---|
| |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Class: | Insecta |
| Order: | Hymenoptera |
| Family: | Formicidae |
| Subfamily: | Proceratiinae |
| Tribe: | Proceratiini |
| Genus: | Discothyrea |
| Species group: | traegaordhi |
| Species: | D. gaia |
| Binomial name | |
| Discothyrea gaia Hita-Garcia & Lieberman, 2019
| |
Discothyrea gaia is known only from the type locality in eastern Zimbabwe. Based on the location of the collecting site, it appears that it was collected in savannah or woodland.
Identification
Hita-Garcia and Lieberman (2019) - The following character combination distinguishes D. gaia from the remainder of the complex:
- moderately thick petiole (DPeI 192–255; LPeI 194–264)
- comparatively shorter legs (HFI 54–58)
- mesotibia with distinct apicoventral spur
- abundant, short and fine appressed pubescence more or less evenly distributed over entire body
Discothyrea gaia is an easily recognizable species within the Afrotropical fauna. The presence of a conspicuous apicoventral spur on the mesotibia separates it from most other group members, except Discothyrea poweri and Discothyrea traegaordhi. The latter two lack any standing pilosity on the dorsal surfaces of the body, which is present in D. gaia. Not considering setation, D. gaia possesses shorter legs (HFI 54–58) and a thinner petiole (DPeI 192–255; LPeI 194–264) compared with D. poweri (DPeI 135–173; LPeI 152–194). The petiole of D. gaia is also generally thinner compared with the one of D. traegaordhi (DPeI 235–289; LPeI 236–313). However, there is some overlap in the morphometric ranges of these species. Furthermore, on the basis of the presence of a distinct mesotibial spur, relatively larger eyes (OI 7–10), and a Southern African distribution, it seems intuitive that D. gaia belongs to a putative clade that also contains D. poweri and D. traegaordhi.
Varies mainly in the shape of the subpetiolar process, which may be lobate or nearly rectangular. The color is inconsequentially variable from testaceous orange to matte brownish, with variable infuscation of the head.
Keys including this Species
Distribution
Latitudinal Distribution Pattern
Latitudinal Range: -19.8149° to -19.8149°.
| North Temperate |
North Subtropical |
Tropical | South Subtropical |
South Temperate |
- Source: AntMaps
Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Afrotropical Region: Zimbabwe (type locality).
Distribution based on AntMaps
Distribution based on AntWeb specimens
Check data from AntWeb
Countries Occupied
| Number of countries occupied by this species based on AntWiki Regional Taxon Lists. In general, fewer countries occupied indicates a narrower range, while more countries indicates a more widespread species. |
|
Estimated Abundance
| Relative abundance based on number of AntMaps records per species (this species within the purple bar). Fewer records (to the left) indicates a less abundant/encountered species while more records (to the right) indicates more abundant/encountered species. |
|
Biology
Castes
Discothyrea.png)
X-ray micro-CT scan 3D model of Discothyrea gaia (worker) prepared by the Economo lab at OIST.
See on Sketchfab. See list of 3D images.
Nomenclature
The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's Online Catalogue of the Ants of the World.
- gaia. Discothyrea gaia Hita Garcia & Lieberman, in Hita Garcia, Lieberman, et al. 2019: 43, figs. 4H, 6H-12H, 13A, 14H, 33, 34 (w.) ZIMBABWE.
- Type-material: holotype worker, 6 paratype workers.
- Type-locality: holotype Zimbabwe: Manicaland, Melsetter, Umtali (= Mutare), -19.8, 32.86667, 1700 m., ANTC42123, ii.1969 (R. Mussard); paratypes with same data.
- Type-depositories: BMNH (holotype); BMNH, CASC, MCZC, MHNG, SAMC (paratypes).
- Distribution: Zimbabwe.
Unless otherwise noted the text for the remainder of this section is reported from the publication that includes the original description.
Description
Worker
(n = 8) EL 0.04–0.05; HL 0.53–0.61; HW 0.43–0.51; SL 0.29–0.36; PH 0.29–0.35; PW 0.31–0.38; DML 0.43–0.51; PrH 0.33–0.40; WL 0.60–0.74; HFL 0.35–0.41; PeL 0.09–0.12; PeW 0.21–0.25; PeH 0.20–0.27; LT3 0.30–0.41; LT4 0.36–0.47; OI 7–9; CI 79–84; SI 54–60; LMI 46–49; DMI 50–53; DMI2 67–76; ASI 112–125; HFI 54–58; DPeI 192–255; LPeI 194–264.
Head clearly longer than broad (CI 79–84), subrectangular; posterior head margin straight, posterodorsal corners of head rounded. In frontal view, sides of head subparallel; eyes relatively large (OI 7–9), round, usually with several distinct ommatidia, situated almost halfway between anterolateral corner of gena and posterior head margin; eyes just visible in frontal view; frontal lamella in profile quite low, broadly triangular to lobate, apex convex to subacute; lamella slightly translucent, evenly so across its disc, without basal fenestra; medial clypeus gently to distinctly convex, prolonged anteromedially, lateral clypeus curving broadly between antennal sockets and anterolateral corners of head, bearing short curved setae. Antenna with moderately long scape (SI 54–60), scape moderately incrassate, gently bent; pedicel campaniform, longer than broad; true antennomere count eight; apparent antennomere count eight to eleven, flagellomeres basad apical club highly compressed, taken together only slightly longer than apical club. Ventral head with moderately developed postoccipital ridge, without or with very short anteromedian carina; medial region of hypostoma rounded-triangular, arms strongly narrowed, similar in width across their length; palpal formula not examined. Mandible edentate; basal angle round to somewhat truncate confluent with prebasal median irregularly shaped carina running halfway of masticatory margin; ectal face with longitudinal carina confluent with masticatory margin for most of its length, leaving a narrow comma-shaped depressed region including basal angle.
Mesosoma gently sloping posteroventrally, pronotum slightly higher than propodeum; in dorsal view mesosoma conspicuously slender and elongate (DMI 50–53; DMI2 67–76) with concave sides, pronotum wider than propodeum and narrowest point of mesosoma around midpoint; pronotal humeri rounded; posterior propodeal margin straight; posterodorsal corners of propodeum rounded; declivitous face of propodeum very weakly concave in profile and oblique posterior view; propodeal spiracle inconspicuous, directed posterolaterally; propodeal lobes well-developed, lobate.
Legs short (HFI 55–56); mesotibia with apicoventral spur; mesobasitarsus relatively short, about as long as tarsomeres II–IV taken together.
Petiolar node thick, scarcely attenuated dorsally, about 1.9 to 2.6 times higher than broad (LPeI 194–264); in profile anterior face of node subvertical to shallowly sloping posterodorsally, apex thickly rounded to truncate, posterior face shallowly sloping posteroventrally; in dorsal view, petiole rectangular, sides divergent posteriorly, about 1.9 to 2.5 times broader than long (DPeI 192–255); in anterior view, petiolar outline roughly disciform, dorsum broadly rounded, angles not distinct; in oblique anterior view, anterior face flat; in ventral view, roughly trapezoidal, sides divering posteriorly; subpetiolar process variable in shape, lobate to subrectangular, in general fairly short, apex broadly rounded to flat; petiolar spiracles elliptical to reniform in ventral view.
Abdominal segment 3 campaniform, widest point of tergite just anterad end of segment; AS3 deepest around its midpoint in profile, lacking distinct medial ridge or lobe; AS3 without carinate prora, but still with anterior face distinctly depressed, anterior margin of ventral face weakly concave in ventral view; AT4 between 1.1 and 1.3 times longer than AT3 (ASI 112–125); AT4 hemidemispherical; AS4 with moderately well-developed anterior lip, overlapping around the median one-third of AS3, anterior margin convex in ventral view; successive abdominal segments short, telescopic, often concealed.
Sculpture generally reduced; head, petiole, mesosomal dorsum, abdominal segment 3 shallowly punctulate-reticulate, gena somewhat more coarsely punctate; lateral mesosoma and declivitous face of propodeum becoming weakly rugulose to substrigulate, particularly on lower surfaces; mandible rather roughly sculptured with piligerous punctulae; AT4 somewhat shinier than AT3, mostly smooth but with numerous minute piligerous punctulae.
Setation consisting of abundant but short and fine appressed pubescence more or less evenly distributed over entire body; petiolar node, AT3 and AT4 with variably developed layer of standing pilosity, sometimes predominantly decumbent with a few scattered erect setae, at other times numerous short erect setae present; successive abdominal segments with dense, distinctly longer, standing pilosity; ectal face of mandible with abundant, curved, appressed to decumbent setae; masticatory margin with row of straight setae inserted on mesal face.
Color uniformly dull testaceous orange to matte sandy brown, head sometimes slightly darker.
Type Material
See the beginning of this ("Nomenclature") section for detailed information about the specimen types. A cyber-type of the holotype is also available. This includes: Volumetric raw data (in DICOM format), 3D rotation video, still images of surface volume rendering, and 3D surface (in PLY format) of the physical holotype (The Natural History Museum: CASENT0790100) in addition to stacked digital color images illustrating the head in full-face view, plus profile and dorsal views of the body. The data are deposited at Dryad and can be freely accessed as virtual representations of the type. There is also a Sketchfab 3D surface model of the holotype. It is shown above, in the Caste section, and at Sketchfab (see the link in the Caste Section).
Etymology
In Greek mythology, Gaia was the primordial goddess of the Earth. The species is named for the habit of Discothyrea nesting cryptically in humus and leaf litter. The specific epithet is given as an appositive noun.
References
- Hita-Garcia, F., Lieberman, Z., Audisio, T.L., Liu, C., Economo, E.P. 2019. Revision of the highly specialized ant genus Discothyrea (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Afrotropics with x-ray microtomography and 3D cybertaxonomy. Insect Systematics and Diversity 3(6): 5; 1–84 (doi:10.1093/isd/ixz015).
References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics
- Hita-Garcia F., Z. Lieberman, T. L. Audisio, C. Liu, and E. P. Economo. 2019. Revision of the highly specialized ant genus Discothyrea (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Afrotropics with X-ray microtomography and 3D cybertaxonomy. Insect Systematics and Diversity 3(6): 5:1-84.