Strumigenys hexamera

AntWiki: The Ants --- Online
Strumigenys hexamera
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hymenoptera
Family: Formicidae
Subfamily: Myrmicinae
Tribe: Attini
Genus: Strumigenys
Species: S. hexamera
Binomial name
Strumigenys hexamera
(Brown, 1958)

Pyramica hexamera casent0103819 profile 1.jpg

Pyramica hexamera casent0103819 dorsal 1.jpg

Specimen labels


Common Name
Sedaka-uroko-ari
Language: Japanese

Strumigenys hexamera is a small predatory ant that feeds on minute soil arthropods. Originally from East Asia, where it occurs in broadleaf forests, P. hexamera has been recently introduced to North America, apparently through human commerce. It is rare in Hong Kong with only two records, both from secondary forests at elevations of 142 and 160 m (Tang et al., 2019). It seems to have small monogynous colonies of about 35 individuals (Terayama et al. 2014).

At a Glance • Parthenogenetic  • Limited invasive  

Identification

A member of the argiola complex in the Strumigenys argiola group. Strumigenys hexamera is a minute (~2.0 mm in total length), brown species with elongate mandibles; in full face view only 3 teeth are visible, 2 preapical teeth and one very long apicodorsal tooth which extends over the tooth on the opposite mandible and beyond the outer margin of the opposite mandible. The entire head, scape, and even the mandibles are covered with large circular shaped, somewhat translucent setae. Spongiform tissue present beneath the petiole and postpetiole.

Within the United States, the unique mandibular structure and scale-like setae on the head and body will separate S. hexamera from other members of the genus.

  • Tang & Guenard (2023), Fig. 21. New species records of Strumigenys from Hainan, mainland China in full-face, profile and dorsal views. A–C. Worker of S. heteropha (HNA-01608). D–F. Worker of S. hexamera (HNA-01556). G–I. Worker of S. hirsuta (HNA-01573).

Keys including this Species

Distribution

A rare, introduced species known from two sites in central Florida. The sites were in mesic forest. This is our only known example of an ant apparently introduced into Florida from Japan. Pest status: none. First published Florida record: Deyrup 1988; earlier specimens: 1987. (Deyrup, Davis & Cover, 2000.)

Strumigenys hexamera is now well established in the southeastern US, especially in Mississippi where we have collected it throughout the state in over 17 counties. Compared to other alien species, S. hexamera appears to do well in natural wooded habitats. Joe MacGown has typically collected this species in rich mesic hardwood or mixed pine hardwood forests, often in areas with hilly terrain.

Tang & Guenard (2023) - This species has been tentatively classified as introduced for its record in Hong Kong due to its tramp characteristic (Tang et al. 2019). The new record in Hainan indicates that its presence in nearby Guangdong and Guangxi provinces is likely.

Latitudinal Distribution Pattern

Latitudinal Range: 35.15000153° to 30.51666667°.

   
North
Temperate
North
Subtropical
Tropical South
Subtropical
South
Temperate

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists

Nearctic Region: United States.
Oriental Region: Taiwan.
Palaearctic Region: China, Japan (type locality), Republic of Korea.

Distribution based on AntMaps

AntMapLegend.png

Distribution based on AntWeb specimens

Check data from AntWeb

Countries Occupied

Number of countries occupied by this species based on AntWiki Regional Taxon Lists. In general, fewer countries occupied indicates a narrower range, while more countries indicates a more widespread species.
pChart

Estimated Abundance

Relative abundance based on number of AntMaps records per species (this species within the purple bar). Fewer records (to the left) indicates a less abundant/encountered species while more records (to the right) indicates more abundant/encountered species.
pChart

Biology

Strumigenys hexamera is subterranean, rather than living in leaf litter. It is a specialized ambush predator of small long-bodied soil arthropods, such as Diplura, Chilopoda, and Collembola (Masuko 1984). Masuko (2009) reported that “Diplura composed 60% of the prey in the field material.” This prey preference is unusual compared with most dacetines whose biologies have been studied, and which apparently prey primarily on Collembola (Masuko 2009). Foraging S. hexamera workers hunt for their prey in small crevices in the soil. Upon encountering prey, S. hexamera moves to a crouching position, pulls its antennae back into recessed antennal scrobes lining the side of the head, closes its mandibles, and remains motionless. The ant may remain still for >20 min while it waits for the prey to advance and crawl on top of her head. Strumigenys hexamera is uniquely equipped for this situation, having a flattened head and slightly upturned mandibles, each of which terminates with a sharp apical tooth, allowing the ant to strike at prey passing overhead. When the prey is in the correct position, the ant opens its mandibles and suddenly snaps them shut, impaling the prey with the apical teeth (Masuko 1984). Strumigenys hexamera has also been reported to coat its body with soil and other detritus using its forelegs, a behavior that may camouflage the ant's odor from the prey (Masuko 1984, see Strumigenys behavior).

Tang et al. (2019): The record of S. hexamera in Hong Kong represents the first record of this species for continental China. This species is known as an introduced species in Southeast USA (Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi), and was reported as introduced within the Ogasawara Islands (Shindo 1979). Here we tentatively classify this species as introduced to Hong Kong in light of its tramp characteristics, including its known thelytokous reproductive strategy (Masuko 2013), and the lack of previous collections in Hong Kong or other parts of mainland China. However, for this species, as for many tramp species across Asia, further study is needed to determine their exact origin and the extent of their native range. Malaise traps yielded female alates in sampling conducted from March 16 - March 31.

Also see Hunting Tactics in Short-Mandibulate Strumigenys for more about this ant's hunting behavior.

Life History Traits

  • Queen number: monogynous (Terayama et al. 2014)
  • Mean colony size: 35 (Terayama et al. 2014)

Castes

Worker

Brown 1958 E hexamerus.jpg
.

Nomenclature

The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's Online Catalogue of the Ants of the World.

  • hexamera. Epitritus hexamerus Brown, 1958d: 70, figs. 1-3 (w.q.) JAPAN. Combination in Pyramica: Bolton, 1999: 1672; in Strumigenys: Baroni Urbani & De Andrade, 2007: 121. See also: Bolton, 2000: 388.

Unless otherwise noted the text for the remainder of this section is reported from the publication that includes the original description.

Description

Worker

Bolton (2000) - TL 2.0-2.2, HL 0.50-0.53, HW 0.53-0.55, CI 106-108, ML 0.18-0.22, MI 36-42, SL 0.23-0.25, SI 46-47, PW 0.28-0.31, AL 0.57-0.60 (3 measured).

Apicodorsal tooth of mandible elongate and spiniform. Mandible with 2 preapical teeth, both located in distal half of mandible and the proximal preapical tooth somewhat longer than the distal. Dorsal surfaces of mandibles and scapes with orbicular hairs. Hairs on leading edge of scape curved toward apex of scape. Cephalic dorsum with orbicular hairs more or less evenly distributed; there is no hairless patch on each side mesad of the lateral margin in the area where the margins are most strongly divergent. CI > 100. Mesonotum in profile bulging posteriorly over base of propodeum, overhanging metanotal groove.

Queen

TL 2.8, HL 0.60, ML 0.20, WL 0.76, scape L 0.27, funiculus L 0.49 mm. CI 102, MI 34. Eyes moderate in size, well underneath on dorsal scrobe borders. Alitrunk robust, humeri very weakly subangulate, without tubercles. Mesonotum gently convex; scutellum rounded behind and not strongly projecting. Propodeal teeth extremely small, with infradental lamellae. Parapsidal furrows fine but distinct. Petiolar node shorter and broader than in worker, the anterior face more concave and the two carinae more distinct, forming a miniature peak on each side above. Mesonotum with orbicular squamiform hairs like those of head. As in the worker, there are no erect specialized hairs on head or alitrunk.

Type Material

Bolton (2000) - Holotype worker and paratype worker, JAPAN: Kyushu, Provo Chikugo, Korasan, 25.ix.1955 (S. Miyamoto); paratype queen (dealate), JAPAN: Honshu, Numazu City, Sige-toge, 22.v.1949, 250 m., under stone (K. Okano) (Museum of Comparative Zoology) [examined].

Brown (1958) reported the head of the paratype queen has been lost.

References

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

  • Azuma M. 1977. On the myrmecological-fauna of Mt. Rokko, Hyogo, with description of a new species (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Hyogo Biology 7:112-118.
  • Azuma, S. and M. Kinjo. 1987. Family Formicidae, In Checklist of the insects of Okinawa. The Biological Society of Okinawa, Nishihara. Pages 310-312.
  • Brown W. L., Jr. 1958. A new Japanese species of the dacetine ant genus Epitritus. Mushi 31: 69-72.
  • Choi B.M., K. Ogata, and M. Terayama. 1993. Comparative studies of ant faunas of Korea and Japan. 1. Faunal comparison among islands of Southern Korean and northern Kyushu, Japan. Bull. Biogeogr. Soc. Japan 48(1): 37-49.
  • Choi B.M., and J. R. Bang. Studies on the distribution of ants (Formicidae) in Korea (12): the analysis of ant communities in 23 islands. Journal of Cheongju National University of Education 30:317-330.
  • Eto S., and K. Ogata. 1983. Ants of Hirado Island, Kyushu. Bulletin of the Nagasaki Prefecture Biological Group 25: 7-11.
  • Guénard B., and R. R. Dunn. 2012. A checklist of the ants of China. Zootaxa 3558: 1-77.
  • Harada Y. 2008. Ant fauna of Joyama Park, Ijuin-cho, Kagoshima-ken, southern Japan. Bull. Biogeogr. Soc. Japan 63: 87-96.
  • Harada Y., K. Nishikubo, K. Matsumoto, M. Matsuda, Y. Inazawa, Y. Ozono, S. Koto, N. Kawaguchi, and S. Yamane. 2011. Ant fauna of Japanese beech (Fagus crenata) forests in southwestern Japan. Bull. Biogeogr. Soc. Japan 66: 115-127.
  • Hosoichi S., W. Tasen, S. H. Park. A. Le Ngoc, Y. Kuboki, and K. Ogata. 2015. Annual fire resilience of ground-dwelling ant communities in Hiraodai Karst Plateau grassland in Japan. Entomological Science 18: 254–261.
  • Hosoishi S. 2006. Ant fauna of Noko Island. pp99-107. In: The floristic and faunistic surveys of the Noko Island.
  • Kawahara Y., S. Hosoyamada, and S. Yamane. 1999. Ant fauna of the Terayama Station for Education and Research on Nature, Kagoshima University. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Kagoshima University. Natural Science 50: 147-156.
  • Kim C.H., B.M. Choi, and J.R. Bang. 1992. Studies on the distribution of ants (Formicidae) in Korea (8)-Ant fauna in 10 islands, Chollanam-do. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 31(4): 345-359.
  • Li Z.h. 2006. List of Chinese Insects. Volume 4. Sun Yat-sen University Press
  • Lyu D.P. 2003. Systematics of Myrmicinae from Korea (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). PhD thesis Faculty of the Graduate School of Chungbuk National University 330 pages.
  • Lyu D.P., B.M. Choi, and S. Cho. 2001. Review of Korean Dacetini (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Ins. Koreana 18(3): 1-13.
  • Masuko K. 1984. Studies on the predatory biology of Oriental Dacetine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) I. Some Japanese species of Strumigenys, Pentastruma, and Epitritus, and a Malaysian Labidogenys, with special reference to hunting tactics in short-mandibulate forms. Insectes Sociaux 31(4): 429-451.
  • Masuko, K. 2010. Nest density and distribution of subterranean ants in an evergreen broadleaf forest in Japan with special reference to Amblyopone silvestrii. Entomological Science 13:193
  • Matsumura S. and Yamane Sk. 2012. Species composition and dominant species of ants in Jigenji Park, Kagoshima City, Japan. Nature of Kagoshima 38: 99–107
  • Matsumura S., and S. Yamane. 2012. Species composition and dominant species of ants in Jigenji Park, Kagoshima City, Japan. Nature of Kagoshima 38: 99-107.
  • Minato M., T. Kameyama, F. Ito, and T. Itino. 1996. A preliminary report of ant fauna in Gagawa Prefecture. Ari 20: 9-13.
  • Onoyama K. 1976. A premilinary study on the ant fauna of Okinawa-ken, with taxonomic notes (Japan; Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ecol. Stud. Nat. Cons. Ryukyu Isl. II: 121-141.
  • Park S. H., S. Hosoishi, K. Ogata, and Y. Kuboki. 2014. Clustering of ant communities and indicator species analysis using self-organizing maps. Comptes Rendus Biologies http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2014.07.003
  • Park, Seong, Joon and Byung, and Kim, Jin. 2002. Faunal Comparison of Ants among Cheongsando and Other Islands of South Sea in Korea. Korean Jornal of Entomology. 32(1):7-12.
  • Terayama M. 1992. Structure of ant communities in East Asia. A. Regional differences and species richness. Bulletin of the Bio-geographical Society of Japan 47: 1-31.
  • Terayama M. 2009. A synopsis of the family Formicidae of Taiwan (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Research Bulletin of Kanto Gakuen University. Liberal Arts 17:81-266.
  • Terayama M., C. C. Lin, and W. J. Wu. 1995. The ant genera Epitritus and Kyidris from Taiwan (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology 53: 85-89.
  • Terayama M., K. Ogata, and B.M. Choi. 1994. Distribution records of ants in 47 prefectures of Japan. Ari (report of the Myrmecologists Society of Japan) 18: 5-17.
  • Terayama M., S. Kubota, and K. Eguchi. 2014. Encyclopedia of Japanese ants. Asakura Shoten: Tokyo, 278 pp.
  • Terayama M., and S. Kubota. 1989. The ant tribe Dacetini (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Taiwan, with descriptions of three new species. Japanese Journal of Entomology 57: 778-792.
  • Terayama M., and S. Kubota. 1994. Ants from Aogashima Island. Ari 17: 11.
  • Terayama M., and S. Kubota. 2002. Ants of Tokyo, Japan. ARI 26: 1-32.
  • Terayama, M. 2009. A synopsis of the family Formicidae of Taiwan (Insecta; Hymenoptera). The Research Bulletin of Kanto Gakuen University 17: 81-266.
  • Terayama. M. and Inoue. N. 1988. Ants collected by the members of the Soil Zoological Expedition to Taiwan. ARI Reports of the Myrmecologists Society (Japan) 18: 25-28
  • Touyama Y., T. Yamamoto, and N. Nakagoshi. 1998. Myrmecofaunal change with bamboo invasion into broadleaf forests. J. For. Res. 3:155-159.
  • Xu Z. H., and X. G. Zhou. 2004. Systematic study on the ant genus Pyramica Roger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 29: 440-450.
  • Xu Z. and X.-G. Zhou. 2004. Systematic study on the ant genus Pyramica Roger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 29(3): 440-450
  • Yamane S., S. Ikudome, and M. Terayama. 1999. Identification guide to the Aculeata of the Nansei Islands, Japan. Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press, xii + 831 pp. pp, 138-317.
  • Yamane S., Y. Harada, and K. Eguchi. 2013. Classification and ecology of ants. Natural history of ants in Southern Kyushu. 200 pages
  • Yamane S.; Ikudome, S.; Terayama, M. 1999. Identification guide to the Aculeata of the Nansei Islands, Japan. Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press, xii + 831 pp. pp138-317.