Monomorium madecassum

Monomorium madecassum is the only member of its complex found on Madagascar, where it can be found throughout the island. Most CAS material has been collected in Toliara. Although not as abundant in samples as several other small species, this ant has been taken from different vegetation assemblages, ranging from spiny forest to rainforest, and can exist in disturbed forest areas and even in grassland. Various collection methods have been successful, and its inclusion in malaise trap samples indicates this species will forage arboreally. The ant appears to have catholic tastes in terms of nest sites, colonies having been sampled in a dead branch above ground and also under stones. (Heterick 2006)

Identification
Heterick (2006) - A member of the M. leopoldinum complex in the M. monomorium species group. Workers of Monomorium madecassum are immediately recognizable by virtue of their large propodeal spiracle, clypeal denticles, and relatively large eyes. The petiolar node and postpetiole also tend to be high and narrow in most specimens. African populations of M. madecassum are on average larger than Malagasy populations of this species. Workers also tend to be more hirsute, with more than two pairs of erect propodeal setae, according to Bolton (1987). By way of contrast, Malagasy workers usually have one or two pairs of erect propodeal setae, but a series from Ankarafantsika, Mahajanga Province, is pilose like the African workers. (As mentioned for Monomorium exiguum, degree of pilosity does not appear to be useful as a diagnostic character at a species level for many small Monomorium.)

The queen and male of M. madecassum are both very large for members of the M. monomorium group, and each, like the worker, possesses a very large propodeal spiracle. The compound eye of the male is elongate-oval. The reproductive wing is a pale off-white, although its veins are fairly well-defined.

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Afrotropical Region: Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Kenya, Sudan. Malagasy Region: Madagascar, Mayotte.

Nomenclature

 * . Monomorium minutum r. madecassum Forel, 1892l: 255 (w.q.m.) MADAGASCAR.
 * Type-material: lectotype worker (by designation of Heterick, 2006: 128), 1 paralectotype worker, 1 paralectotype queen.
 * Type-locality: lectotype Madagascar: Imerina (Camboué); paralectotypes with same data.
 * [Note: original syntype specimens from Madagascar: Antananarivo (Camboué), are not mentioned by Heterick.].
 * Type-depository: MHNG.
 * Distribution: Madagascar.
 * Subspecies of minutum: Dalla Torre, 1893: 67; Forel, 1907a: 18; Forel, 1907g: 77; Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 864, 1027; Emery, 1922e: 172; Santschi, 1926b: 238; Ettershank, 1966: 90.
 * Status as species: Bolton, 1995b: 264; Heterick, 2006: 128 (redescription); Hita Garcia, et al. 2013: 212.
 * Senior synonym of aequum: Heterick, 2006: 128.
 * Senior synonym of estherae: Heterick, 2006: 128.
 * Senior synonym of explorator: Heterick, 2006: 128.
 * Senior synonym of leopoldinum: Heterick, 2006: 128.
 * Distribution: Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Kenya, Madagascar, South Sudan.
 * aequum. Monomorium aequum Santschi, 1928f: 195, fig. 3b (w.) DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO.
 * Type-material: holotype worker.
 * Type-locality: Democratic Republic of Congo (“Congo belge”): Stanleyville (= Kisangani) (A. Reichensperger).
 * Type-depository: NHMB.
 * Status as species: Ettershank, 1966: 87.
 * Junior synonym of leopoldinum: Bolton, 1987: 397; Bolton, 1995b: 258.
 * Junior synonym of madecassum: Heterick, 2006: 128.
 * estherae. Monomorium (Monomorium) estherae Weber, 1943c: 361, pl. 15, fig. 18 (w.) SOUTH SUDAN.
 * Type-material: lectotype worker (by designation of Heterick, 2006: 128), 1 paralectotype worker.
 * Type-locality: lectotype South Sudan (“Anglo-Egyptian Sudan”): Imatong Mts, W slopes, ca 5050 ft, 4.viii.1939, no. 1423 (N.A. Weber); paralectotype with same data.
 * [Note: Heterick, 2006: 128, writes 24.vii.-5.viii.1943, no. 1423, for the type-material, but Weber’s introduction (p.264) indicates that collecting took place in 1939, with the date 4.viii., no.1423 on p. 362, where 3 syntypes are mentioned.]
 * Type-depository: MCZC.
 * Status as species: Ettershank, 1966: 89.
 * Junior synonym of leopoldinum: Bolton, 1987: 397; Bolton, 1995b: 261.
 * Junior synonym of madecassum: Heterick, 2006: 128.
 * explorator. Monomorium explorator Santschi, 1920b: 12, fig. 1a-b (w.) GABON.
 * Type-material: holotype worker.
 * Type-locality: Gabon: Samkita (F. Faure).
 * Type-depository: NHMB.
 * Status as species: Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 863; Bernard, 1953b: 235; Ettershank, 1966: 89.
 * Junior synonym of leopoldinum: Bolton, 1987: 397; Bolton, 1995b: 261.
 * Junior synonym of madecassum: Heterick, 2006: 128.
 * leopoldinum. Monomorium minutum var. leopoldinum Forel, 1905b: 179 (w.) DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO.
 * Type-material: lecototype worker (by designation of Heterick, 2006: 128), 2 paralectotype workers.
 * Type-locality: lectotype Democratic Republic of Congo (“Upper Congo”): Stanleyville (= Kisangani), St Gabriel (Kohl); paralectotypes with same data.
 * [Note: the original description has Luja as collector of the type-material, but the lectotype data label has Kohl.]
 * Type-depository: MHNG.
 * Subspecies of minutum: Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 864; Emery, 1922e: 172; Menozzi, 1942: 169; Eidmann, 1944: 450; Ettershank, 1966: 90.
 * Status as species: Bolton, 1987: 397 (redescription); Bolton, 1995b: 263.
 * Junior synonym of madecassum: Heterick, 2006: 128.

Worker
Heterick (2006) - Lectotype (M. madecassum): HML 1.24 HL 0.49 HW 0.40 CeI 82 SL 0.35 SI 86 PW 0.26. Lectotype (Monomorium leopoldinum): HML 1.41 HL 0.53 HW 0.44 CeI 84 SL 0.39 SI 89 PW 0.29. Lectotype (Monomorium exploratory): HML 1.34 HL 0.51 HW 0.42 CeI 82 SL 0.36 SI 86 PW 0.28. Lectotype (Monomorium aequum): HML 1.48 HL 0.52 HW 0.45 CeI 87 SL 0.37 SI 82 PW 0.30. Lectotype (Monomorium estherae): HML 1.34 HL 0.51 HW 0.41 CeI 80 SL 0.35 SI 85 PW 0.27. (non-types): HML 1.14–1.27 HL 0.46–0.51 HW 0.37–0.41 CeI 78–83 SL 0.32–0.37 SI 83–93 PW 0.23–0.27 (n=20).

HEAD: Head rectangular; vertex planar or weakly concave; frons shining and smooth except for piliferous pits; pilosity of frons a mixture of well-spaced, distinctly longer erect and semi-erect setae interspersed with shorter decumbent setae or setulae. Eye large, eye width 1.5× greater than greatest width of antennal scape, to moderate, eye width 1–1.5× greatest width of antennal scape; (in full-face view) eyes set above midpoint of head capsule; (viewed in profile) eyes set around midline of head capsule; eye elliptical, curvature of inner eye margin may be more pronounced than that of its outer margin. Antennal segments 12; antennal club three-segmented. Clypeal carinae always well-defined; anteromedian clypeal margin emarginate, clypeal carinae terminating in small denticles; paraclypeal setae moderately long and fine, curved; posteromedian clypeal margin extending slightly beyond level of posterior margin of antennal fossae. Anterior tentorial pits situated nearer antennal fossae than mandibular insertions. Frontal lobes straight, parallel. Psammophore absent. Palp formula 1,2; Mandibular teeth three, plus minute, basal denticle or angle; mandibles with sub-parallel inner and outer margins, smooth (except for piliferous pits); masticatory margin of mandibles approximately vertical or weakly oblique; basal tooth a small to minute denticle or angle, much smaller than t3 (four teeth present).

MESOSOMA: Promesonotum shining and smooth on dorsum, entire lower mesopleuron often distinctly striolate but sculpture may be vestigial; (viewed in profile) promesonotum broadly convex; promesonotal setae greater than twelve; standing promesonotal setae a mixture of well-spaced, distinctly longer, erect and semi-erect setae which are curved distally and often paired, interspersed with much shorter, incurved, decumbent setae; appressed promesonotal setulae well-spaced over entire promesonotum. Metanotal groove strongly impressed, with distinct transverse costulae. Propodeum shining and smooth, with multiple hair like striolae on metapleuron; propodeal dorsum convex; propodeum always smoothly rounded; standing propodeal setae usually consisting of one prominent pair anteriad, with other shorter setae very sparse or absent, more rarely consisting of two anterior pairs or three or four pairs ranged along either side of the propodeal dorsum; appressed propodeal setulae well-spaced and sparse; propodeal spiracle equidistant from metanotal groove and declivitous face of propodeum. Vestibule of propodeal spiracle absent or not visible. Propodeal lobes present as vestigial flanges or small strips of cuticle only.

PETIOLE AND POSTPETIOLE: Petiolar spiracle lateral and situated within anterior sector of petiolar node; node (viewed in profile) cuneate, vertex tapered, or, cuneate, vertex rounded; appearance of node shining and smooth throughout; ratio of greatest node breadth (viewed from front) to greatest node width (viewed in profile) about 4:3; anteroventral petiolar process absent or vestigial; ventral petiolar lobe weakly present to absent; height ratio of petiole to postpetiole between 3:2 and 4:3; height-length ratio of postpetiole between 4:3 and 1:1; postpetiole shining and smooth; postpetiolar sternite without anterior lip or carina, or this structure vestigial.

GASTER: Pilosity of first gastral tergite consisting of well-spaced, erect and semi-erect setae interspersed with a few appressed setulae.

GENERAL CHARACTERS: Color light brownish-yellow to brown, gaster darker. Worker caste monomorphic.

Queen
Heterick (2006) - HML 3.01–3.12 HL 0.76–0.77 HW 0.74–0.75 CeI 96–99 SL 0.56–0.58 SI 76–77 PW 0.88–0.92 (n=2).

HEAD: Head square; vertex weakly concave or planar; frons shining and smooth except for piliferous pits; pilosity of frons a mixture of well-spaced, distinctly longer erect and semi-erect setae interspersed with shorter setae or setulae, which are decumbent or appressed, longer setae thickest on vertex. Eye elliptical, curvature of inner eye margin may be more pronounced than that of its outer margin; (in full-face view) eyes set at about midpoint of head capsule; (viewed in profile) eyes set posteriad of midline of head capsule.

MESOSOMA: Mesoscutum broadly convex anteriad, convexity reduced posteriad; pronotum, mesoscutum and mesopleuron shining and mainly smooth, vestigial striolae, if present, confined to anterior katepisternum; length-width ratio of mesoscutum and scutellum combined between 2:1 and 3:2; axillae narrowly separated (i.e., less than width of one axilla); standing pronotal/mesoscutal setae consisting of a mixture of incurved, semi-erect setae and slightly shorter decumbent setae; appressed pronotal, mescoscutal and mesopleural setulae few, mainly on sides of pronotum and mesopleuron; propodeum shining and smooth, with multiple hair like striolae on metapleuron; propodeum always smoothly rounded; propodeal dorsum flat throughout most of its length; standing propodeal setae consisting of a few decumbent setae only; appressed propodeal setulae well-spaced and sparse; propodeal spiracle nearer metanotal groove than declivitous face of propodeum. Propodeal lobes present as bluntly angled flanges.

WING: Wing veins predominantly depigmented, with distal segments reduced to vestigial lines; vein m–cu always absent; vein cu–a absent.

PETIOLE AND POSTPETIOLE: Petiolar spiracle lateral and situated within anterior sector of petiolar node; node (viewed in profile) conical, vertex tapered; appearance of node shining and weakly striolate posteriad; ratio of greatest node breadth (viewed from front) to greatest node width (viewed in profile) about 4:3; anteroventral petiolar process present as a thin flange tapering posteriad; height ratio of petiole to postpetiole between 4:3 and 1:1; height–length ratio of postpetiole between 3:2 and 4:3; postpetiole shining and smooth; postpetiolar sternite not depressed, its anterior end an inconspicuous lip or small carina.

GASTER: Pilosity of first gastral tergite consisting of a mixture of incurved, erect and semi-erect setae and slightly shorter decumbent setae.

GENERAL CHARACTERS: Color brown. Brachypterous alates not seen. Ergatoid or worker-female intercastes not seen.

Male
Heterick (2006) - HML 2.80–2.84 HL 0.70 HW 0.72–0.74 CeI 104–106 SL 0.21–0.22 SI 28–31 PW 0.90–0.94 (n=2).

HEAD: Head width–mesosoma width ratio between 1:1 and 3:4 to less than 1:2; frons finely longitudinally striolate. Compound eyes protuberant and elliptical tending to elongate; margin of compound eye clearly separated from posterior margin of clypeus. Ocelli turreted. Ratio of length of first funicular segment of antenna to second funicular segment about 1:3. Maximum number of mandibular teeth and denticles four.

MESOSOMA: Mesoscutum broadly convex; mesoscutum with a few vestigial striolae on its dorsum, otherwise both pronotum and mesonotum smooth and shining. Parapsidal furrows vestigial or absent; notauli vestigial. Axillae widely separated (i.e., by width of at least one axilla), axilla fused with scutellum.

WING: Wing veins predominantly depigmented, with distal segments reduced to vestigial lines; vein m–cu absent; vein cu–a absent.

PETIOLE AND POSTPETIOLE: Petiolar spiracle lateral and situated within anterior sector of petiolar node. Petiolar node, (viewed in profile) conical, vertex rounded; appearance of node shining and smooth; ratio of greatest node breadth (viewed from front) to greatest node width (viewed in profile) between 4:3 and 1:1. Anteroventral petiolar process absent or vestigial. Height ratio of petiole to postpetiole between 4:3 and 1:1; height–length ratio of postpetiole between 3:2 and 1:1; postpetiole shining, with vestigial sculpture.

GASTER: Pilosity of first gastral tergite consisting of a mixture of incurved, semi-erect setae and slightly shorter decumbent setae.

GENERAL CHARACTERS: Color chocolate, tibia and tarsi pale brownish-yellow.

Type Material
Heterick (2006) - Lectotype: worker, Madagascar, Imerina, coll. [P.] Camboué. This specimen is designated the lectotype to fix the name for the species. Malagasy workers are generally smaller and less hairy than workers collected in Africa. Paralectotypes: (i) worker, Madagascar, Imerina, coll. [F.] Sikora (MHNG). (ii) queens, Madagascar, Imerina, coll. [P.] Sikora (MHNG).

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

 * Bolton B. 1987. A review of the Solenopsis genus-group and revision of Afrotropical Monomorium Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Entomology 54: 263-452.
 * Eidmann H. 1944. Die Ameisenfauna von Fernando Poo. 27. Beitrag zu den Ergebnissen der Westafrika-Expedition. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Syst. Ökol. Geogr. Tiere 76: 413-490.
 * Ettershank G. 1966. A generic revision of the world Myrmicinae related to Solenopsis and Pheidologeton (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Aust. J. Zool. 14: 73-171.
 * Fisher B. L. 1997. Biogeography and ecology of the ant fauna of Madagascar (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Natural History 31: 269-302.
 * Fisher B. L. 2003. Formicidae, ants. Pp. 811-819 in: Goodman, S. M.; Benstead, J. P. (eds.) 2003. The natural history of Madagascar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, xxi + 1709 pp.
 * Forel A. 1905. Miscellanea myrmécologiques II (1905). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Belg. 49: 155-185.
 * Garcia F.H., Wiesel E. and Fischer G. 2013.The Ants of Kenya (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)Faunal Overview, First Species Checklist, Bibliography, Accounts for All Genera, and Discussion on Taxonomy and Zoogeography. Journal of East African Natural History, 101(2): 127-222
 * Heterick B. 2006. A Revision of the Malagasy Ants Belonging to Genus Monomorium Mayr, 1855 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Proceeding of the California Academy of Sciences (PCAS) 57: 69-202
 * Menozzi C. 1942. Formiche dell'isola Fernando Poo e del territorio del Rio Muni (Guinea Spagnola). 24. Beitrag zu den wissenschaftlichen Ergebnissen der Forschungsreise H. Eidmann nach Spanisch-Guinea 1939 bis 1940. Zoologischer Anzeiger 140: 164-182.
 * Ravelomanana A., and B. L. Fisher. 2013. Diversity of ants in burned and unburned grassland, and dry deciduous forest in the Beanka Reserve, Melaky Region, western Madagascar. Malagasy Nature 7: 171-183.
 * Santschi F. 1920. Formicides nouveaux du Gabon, du Congo, de la Rhodesia et du Natal. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 60: 6-17.
 * Santschi F. 1928. Descriptions de nouvelles fourmis éthiopiennes (suite). Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines. 16: 191-213.
 * Weber N. A. 1943. The ants of the Imatong Mountains, Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 93: 263-389.
 * Wheeler W. M. 1922. Ants of the American Museum Congo expedition. A contribution to the myrmecology of Africa. IX. A synonymic list of the ants of the Malagasy region. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 45: 1005-1055
 * Wheeler W. M. 1922. Ants of the American Museum Congo expedition. A contribution to the myrmecology of Africa. VIII. A synonymic list of the ants of the Ethiopian region. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 45: 711-1004