Aenictus sulawesiensis

So far A. sulawesiensis has been known only from the type locality.

Identification
A member of the pachycerus group. This species is very similar to Aenictus kutai (see under A. kutai).

Distribution
Sulawesi

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Indo-Australian Region: Indonesia.

Castes
Known only from the worker caste.

Nomenclature

 * . Aenictus sulawesiensis Jaitrong & Wiwatwitaya, 2013: 100, fig. 2A-C (w.) INDONESIA (Sulawesi).

Worker
Holotype: TL 3.25 mm; HL 0.76 mm; HW 0.65 mm; SL 0.63 mm; ML 1.05 mm; PL 0.29 mm, CI 85; SI 96.

Paratypes (n = 9): TL 3.25-3.30 mm; HL 0.75-0.78 mm; HW 0.63-0.65 mm; SL 0.60-0.63 mm; ML 1.04-1.06 mm; PL 0.28-0.30 mm, CI 82-85; SI 96-98.

Head in full-face view elliptical, distinctly longer than broad, with feebly convex sides; posterior margin convex; occipital margin bearing a narrow collar. Antennal scape relatively short, extending beyond 2/3 of head length, but not reaching posterolateral corner of head; antennal segment II slightly shorter than broad; III–VII each almost as long as broad; terminal segment almost as long as VII+VIII+IX. Frontal carinae well developed, fused at the level of antennal base to form a single carina, extending less than half length of head; posterior half of frontal carina very poorly developed, with head in profile roundly concave. Parafrontal ridge well developed, reaching 1/3 of head length (0.30 mm); seen in profile, its anteriormost part well developed and subtriangular, and posterior part feebly convex. Masticatory margin of mandible with large apical tooth followed by a medium-sized subapical tooth and 5–6 denticles; basal margin lacking denticles. Mesosoma elongate and stout; promesonotum seen in profile slightly convex dorsally, sloping gradually to metanotal groove; mesopleuron not clearly demarcated from metapleuron; metanotal groove indistinct; propodeum in profile lower than promesonotum, nearly straight dorsally; propodeal junction angulate; declivity of propodeum shallowly concave, encircled with a rim. Petiole subsessile, almost as long as high, its node short and elevated posteriorly; subpetiolar process weakly developed or almost absent, its ventral margin feebly convex. Postpetiole almost as long as petiole, dorsally convex.

Dorsum of head punctate; lateral face with weaker punctuation (reticulate with smooth and shiny bottoms) than dorsum and partly smooth and shiny or superficially reticulate with smooth interspaces. Antennal scape microreticulate. Mandible entirely micropunctate except for apical tooth and along masticatory margin. Greater part of pronotum superficially sculptured or smooth and shiny. Petiole entirely punctate and opaque; postpetiole entirely punctate except small area on dorsum shiny. First gastral tergite and sternites smooth and shiny except for the basalmost part with dense punctures. Basal half of femora microreticulate, but apical half superficially macroreticulate, smooth and shiny, partly superficially shagreened with smooth and shiny interspaces. Tibiae microreticulate, somewhat shiny.

Head and mesosoma dorsally with dense standing hairs; longest pronotal hair 0.23-0.25 mm long. Dorsum of head, mandible and mesosoma dark brown; legs, waist, and gaster dark reddish brown to reddish brown; antennal scape dark brown except for apicalmost portion reddish brown; all funicular segments reddish brown. Typhlatta spot absent

Type Material
Holotype worker from Indonesia, S. Sulawesi, Barru, Taneterilau, Lipukasi, Forest Complex Coppo (4°30'S, 119°37'E), 8 Jan.2011, coll. Sk. Yamane, CE11-SKY-21. Sixty-seven paratype workers, same data as holotype.

Etymology
The specific name is derived from name of the type locality, Sulawesi Island of Indonesia.

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

 * Borowiec M. L. 2016. Generic revision of the ant subfamily Dorylinae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys 608: 1–280.
 * Jaitron W., and D. Wiwatwitaya. 2013. Two new species of the Aenictus pachycerus species group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) from southeast Asia. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 61(1): 97-102.