Cerapachys

Ants of this genus are rarely collected, due to their cryptic, subterranean habitats. Nests are found under stones, in the soil or under, and in logs and branches.

Identification
Within Australia, Cerapachys can be separated from Sphinctomyrmex (the only other genus of the subfamily known from Australia) by the shape of the gaster. In Cerapachys, the joints between the last 4 segments of the gaster are smooth so that in profile the their upper surfaces form a smooth outline. In Sphinctomyrmex, these segments are separated from each other by distinct constrictions so that in profile the outline is a series of convexities.

Most species of Australian Cerapachys have elongate, cylindrical bodies that are red or black (or less commonly yellow) and shiny. For protection during raids, species of Cerapachys have developed a relatively heavy integument with numerous sharp angles and teeth. Some species also have a ridge along the side of the petiole and often the mesosoma as well. The compound eyes can be large, small, or absent.

Species of Cerapachys are most often confused with ponerines (ants of the subfamily Ponerinae) but differ in the details mentioned above as well as having the frontal lobes very narrow so that the antennal sockets are completely visible when viewed from the front.

See Key to Indian Cerapachys Species

Species richness
Species richness by country based on regional taxon lists (countries with darker colours are more species-rich). View Data



Biology
Species of Cerapachys are specialist predators of other ants and show "army ant" behavior during foraging. Workers are often encountered as individual scouts, small groups or huge columns. They hunt during the day in long files over the ground surface (or occasionally into trees) with many workers moving rapidly together in a loose column. In some cases, they will use scouts to find a suitable nest to raid, these initial scouts then returning to their home nest to recruit additional workers for a full-fledged raid. Chemical trails are laid during raids which are used by workers returning to the nest with prey, either singly or in small groups.

During raids, larvae in the attacked nest are stung and paralysed but not killed. They are then taken back to the host nest where they can survive in this paralysed state for an extended period without increasing in size or pupating. Workers, queens and larvae of Cerapachys all feed on the prey larvae, and this food source can be used during extended periods of non-foraging.

Nests occur in a wide range of sites, most commonly directly in the soil with single, small, simple entrance holes; under rocks; in cracks or between slabs of rock; in rotten wood on or in the ground; less commonly they nest in hollow twigs and beetle borrows in vegetation. Colonies are fairly small, normally with several tens to several hundred workers. Most species will disperse quickly when disturbed but some of the smaller species will lay motionless. Males are attrached to lights at night. A California species has been found walking within a column of a species of Neivamyrmex. In some species workers vibrate their antennae rapidly when foraging.

Fossil species are known from the Oligocene (35-25 million years before present).

Nomenclature

 *  CERAPACHYS [Cerapachyinae: Cerapachyini]
 * Cerapachys Smith, F. 1857a: 74. Type-species: Cerapachys antennatus, by subsequent designation of Bingham, 1903: 28.
 * Cerapachys senior synonym of Ceratopachys: Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 755.
 * Cerapachys senior synonym of Parasyscia, Syscia (and its junior synonym Cysias): Kempf, 1972a: 76; Brown, 1975: 18.
 * Cerapachys senior synonym of Chrysapace, Lioponera, Neophyracaces, Ooceraea, Phyracaces, †Procerapachys: Brown, 1975: 18.
 * Cerapachys senior synonym of Yunodorylus: Bolton, 2003: 141, 268.
 *  ORAPACHYS [unavailable name]
 * Orapachys Forel, 1893a: 162, incorrect subsequent spelling of Cerapachys.
 * CERATOPACHYS [junior synonym of Cerapachys]
 * Ceratopachys Schulz, W.A. 1906: 155, unjustified emendation of Cerapachys.
 * Ceratopachys junior synonym of Cerapachys: Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 755.
 * CHRYSAPACE [junior synonym of Cerapachys]
 * Chrysapace Crawley, 1924: 380. Type-species: Chrysapace jacobsoni (junior secondary homonym in Cerapachys, replaced by Cerapachys crawleyi), by monotypy.
 * Chrysapace junior synonym of Cerapachys: Brown, 1975: 19.
 * CYSIAS [junior synonym of Cerapachys]
 * Cysias Emery, 1902c: 24 [as subgenus of Cerapachys]. Type-species: Ooceraea papuana, by original designation.
 * Cysias raised to genus: Ashmead, 1905b: 382.
 * Cysias subgenus of Cerapachys: Wheeler, W.M. 1910g: 137.
 * Cysias junior synonym of Syscia: Emery, 1911d: 10.
 * Cysias junior synonym of Cerapachys: Kempf, 1972a: 76; see also Brown, 1975: 19.
 * LIOPONERA [junior synonym of Cerapachys]
 * Lioponera Mayr, 1879: 666. Type-species: Lioponera longitarsus, by monotypy.
 * Lioponera subgenus of Cerapachys: Forel, 1892l: 244.
 * Lioponera revived status as genus: Dalla Torre, 1893: 17.
 * Lioponera junior synonym of Cerapachys: Brown, 1975: 19.
 * NEOPHYRACACES [junior synonym of Cerapachys]
 * Neophyracaces Clark, 1941: 76. Type-species: Phyracaces clarus, by original designation.
 * Neophyracaces junior synonym of Cerapachys: Brown, 1975: 19.
 * OOCERAEA [junior synonym of Cerapachys]
 * Ooceraea Roger, 1862a: 248. Type-species: Ooceraea fragosa, by monotypy.
 * Ooceraea subgenus of Cerapachys: Emery, 1902d: 24; Wheeler, W.M. 1902d: 185; Emery, 1911d: 10.
 * Ooceraea junior synonym of Cerapachys: Brown, 1975: 19.
 * PARASYSCIA [junior synonym of Cerapachys]
 * Parasyscia Emery, in André, 1882c: 235. Type-species: Parasyscia piochardi, by monotypy.
 * Parasyscia subgenus of Cerapachys: Forel, 1892l: 243.
 * Parasyscia junior synonym of Cerapachys: Kempf, 1972a: 76.
 * PHYRACACES [junior synonym of Cerapachys]
 * Phyracaces Emery, 1902c: 23. Type-species: Cerapachys mayri, by original designation.
 * Phyracaces junior synonym of Cerapachys: Brown, 1975: 19.
 * SYSCIA [junior synonym of Cerapachys]
 * Syscia Roger, 1861a: 19. Type-species: Syscia typhla, by monotypy.
 * Syscia subgenus of Cerapachys: Wheeler, W.M. 1902d: 185; Emery, 1902c: 24.
 * Syscia senior synonym of Cysias: Emery, 1911d: 10.
 * Syscia junior synonym of Cerapachys: Kempf, 1972a: 76.
 * YUNODORYLUS [junior synonym of Cerapachys]
 * Yunodorylus Xu, 2000b: 297. Type-species: Yunodorylus sexspinus, by original designation.
 * Yunodorylus junior synonym of Cerapachys: Bolton, 2003: 141, 268.

Bolton 1994 - Ants with the following combination of characters together.

1 Clypeus, from front to back, moderately broad to reduced; in the latter bringing the antennal sockets close to the anterior margin of the head.

2 Antennal sockets horizontal, in the plane of the transverse axis of the head, partially or wholly exposed in full-face view.

3 Frontal lobes rarely weakly present, predominantly vestigial to absent; usually narrow vertical carinae are all that are present between the antennal sockets.

4 Narrow neck joining condylar bulb of antennal scape to shaft of scape proper straight, not sharply angled or bent downwards in frontal or full-face view.

5 Eyes usually present but frequently reduced or absent in some groups; antenna with 9-12 segments.

6 Promesonotal suture usually absent (present in just one species, where it is fused and inflexible), the alitrunk fusiform and box-like.

7 Metapleural gland orifice in lower posterior corner of metapleuron, opening laterally, the orifice concealed behind a ventrally directed cuticular flange or flap.

8 Propodeal spiracle situated low down on the side of the sclerite, at or behind the midlength.

9 Metatibial glands present.

10 Metacoxal cavities closed; cuticular annulus around each cavity broad and complete, the annulus not broken medioventrally nor with a flexible suture traversing the annulus from the coxal cavity to the cavity in which the petiole articulates.

11 Propodeal lobes present.

12 Waist of 1 or 2 segments. Generally of a single, separated segment, the petiole (= abdominal segment 2); usually also with a deep constriction between abdominal segments 3 and 4. Abdominal segment 3 with a graded morphoclinal reduction from a full-sized segment to a small postpetiole, thus making the waist 2-segmented.

13 Petiole sessile to subsessile, the tergite and sternite not fused; sternite of petiole with a simple posterior margin and simple articulation to the third abdominal segment.

14 Abdominal stridulatory system absent.

15 Abdominal spiracles 5-7 shifted backwards, not concealed by the posterior margins of the preceding segments and visible without distension or dissection of the abdomen.

16 Helcium sternite large and convex, bulging ventrally, visible in profile in normally mounted specimens; tergite of helcium lacking a notch or impression in its dorsal margin anteriorly.

17 Abdominal segment 3 [Note: petiole is abdominal segment 2] with tergosternal fusion; tergites and sternites of following abdominal segments (4-7) not fused.

18 Abdominal segment 4 with presclerites sharply defined and differentiated from the postsclerites, the former fitting tightly within the posterior end of the third segment.

19 Pygidium (tergite of abdominal segment 7, the last visible tergite) large, its dorsum flattened or impressed; lateral and/or posterior margins of flattened area armed with a series or row of denticles, small teeth, or peg-like spines, with more than 2 pairs present.

20 Sting large and strongly developed.

Brown (1975, Footnote 38): The singularis group consists of large and medium-sized red ants, some with a black or fuscous gaster, that possess a well-defined carina curving from the posterior corner of the head forward toward the compound eye, which it usually fails to reach. This carina is a kind of anterior continuation of the sharp dorsolateral margins of the trunk and petiole, well developed in these species. In the small, black, forest species of the turneri group from Queensland, the posterior corner of the head may bear a blunt ridge where the sides and the cervical surface of the head meet, but this does not form a sharp carina and does not curve toward the eye.

The singularis group is still poorly known, and some of the species coming out close together in the key may well be synonyms, particularly where one form is known only from the worker, and the other only from the queen, for example, Cerapachys pictus and Cerapachys singularis. I have synonymized the "subspecies" rotula under 'singularis', because they differ chiefly in whether the gaster is red or fuscous, and this character varies even in the rotula type series.

Additional References

 * Bolton, B. (1990). Abdominal characters and status of the cerapachyine ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Journal of Natural History, 24: 53–68.
 * Bolton, B. (1990). Army ants reassessed: the phylogeny and classification of the doryline section (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Journal of Natural History, 24: 1339–1364.
 * Brady, S. G., Ward, P. S. (2005). Morphological phylogeny of army ants and other dorylomorphs (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Systematic Entomology, 30: 593–618.
 * [[Media:Briese&Macauley 1981.pdf|Briese, D. T., Macauley, B. J. (1981). Food collection within an ant community in semi-arid Australia, with special reference to seed harvesters. Australian Journal of Ecology, 6: 1–19.PDF]]
 * Brown, S. G. A., Heddle, R. J. (2003). Prevention of anaphylaxis with ant venom immunotherapy. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 3: 511–516.
 * Brown, W. L., Jr. (1975). Contributions toward a reclassification of the Formicidae. V. Ponerinae, tribes Platythyreini, Cerapachyini, Cylindromyrmecini, Acanthostichini, and Aenictogitini. Search. Agriculture (Ithaca, New York), 5(1):1–115.
 * Clark, J. (1923). Australian Formicidae. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 9: 72–89.
 * Clark, J. (1924). Australian Formicidae. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 10: 75–89.
 * Clark, J. (1941). Australian Formicidae. Notes and new species. Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria. 12: 71–94.
 * Smith, F. (1857). Catalogue of the hymenopterous insects collected at Sarawak, Borneo; Mount Ophir, Malacca; and at Singapore, by A. R. Wallace. [part]. J. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool. 2: 42–88.
 * Wilson, E. O. (1958). Observations on the behavior of the cerapachyine ants. Insectes Sociaux, 5: 129–140.
 * York, A. (1994). The long-term effects of fire on forest ant communities: management implications for the conservation of biodiveristy . Mem. Qld Mus., 36: 231–239.