Eurhopalothrix emeryi

Mann reported the species as nesting in small colonies beneath stones or logs deep in the woods, and that individuals are hard to discern on account of their neutral color and habit of remaining motionless when disturbed. All of the worker specimens collected during the recent survey were taken from sifted litter. (Sarnat and Economo 2012)

Identification
Eurhopalothrix emeryi workers can be distinguished from Eurhopalothrix insidiatrix (the only Fijian congener) by the more groomed appearance of the cephalic and mesosomal rugae.

Distribution
The type locality is believed to be an error. This species is not likely to occur in Australia.

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Australasian Region: Australia. Indo-Australian Region: Fiji.

Nomenclature

 *  emeryi. Rhopalothrix emeryi Forel, 1912n: 58 (q.) AUSTRALIA. Combination in Eurhopalothrix: Brown & Kempf, 1960: 230. Senior synonym of elegans: Brown & Kempf, 1960: 230.
 * elegans. Rhopalothrix (Rhopalothrix) elegans Mann, 1921: 467, fig. 25 (w.) FIJI IS. Junior synonym of emeryi: Brown & Kempf, 1960: 230.

Worker
Taylor (1980) - Dimensions [smallest (Nadarivatu) and largest (Mt Tomanivi) available specimens, selected by HW measurement]. — TL ca 5.0, 5.5; HL 1.24, 1.35; HW 1.20, 1.27; CI 97, 94; ML 0.34, 0.37; M127, 27; SL 0.73, 0.77; S1 61, 61; maximum diameter of eye 0.12, 0.15; PW 0.73, 0.83; WL 1.44, 1.59; petiolar node width 0.33, 0.35; postpetiole width 0.65, 0.73; gastral width 0.95, 1.07.

Additional description — Basal halves of mandibles coarsely and closely punctate. Clypeus, edges of antennal scrobes, and extreme lateral and apical portions of occipital lobes coarsely punctate-rugose. Frons otherwise bearing strong smooth costae, shining when clean; their reflections regularly interrupted by minute shallow pits marking hair bases, which do not significantly break costular surfaces. Intercostal grooves strong, almost as deep as wide, generally slightly wider than adjacent costae; frequently packed with greyish dirt or secreted material. The costae arranged in more or less parallel series, one set approximately longitudinal between the antennal scrobes, and others, behind the level of the antennal insertions, parallel to the diverging sides of the head and to the transverse occipital border. They thus form an approximately triangular figure around the centre of the frons, where there is a tendency to fusion and rugosity.

Anterodorsal and dorsolateral areas of pronotum coarsely and deeply rugoreticulate, lower part of anterior face transversely costulate, like posterior part of head, the costae extending to the ventrolateral areas of the sclerite. Mesosomal dorsum otherwise longitudinally costulate; mes- and metepisterna and sides of propodeum with diagonal costae sloping forwards; declivitous face of propodeum finely shagreened.

Specialised hairs additional to those of scapes and the three terminal gastral segments less strongly differentiated than in other species, two to three times longer than those of ground pilosity, barely thicker; three pairs on head and two on promesonotum. First gastral tergite with about 10 erect specialised hairs arranged in two loose longitudinal rows.

Queen
Taylor (1980) - The emeryi holotype alate female is matched closely by Mann's Eurhopalothrix elegans (=emeryi) syntype female from Nadarivatu. Both these specimens resemble workers from the E. elegans type-series, and those from Nandrau and Navai, in those features which distinguish them from the Eurhopalothrix insidiatrix worker types.

Specialised hairs differentiated from ground pilosity even less strongly than in workers; occupying similar positions on head and gaster. Mesosoma of holotype badly damaged by mounting pin, bearing at least one pair of erect hairs on pronotum and two on mesocutum. This configuration confirmed by the elegans syntype, which in addition has one pair of hairs on the mesoscutellum.

Type Material
Forel described emeryi from a female which he said was from "Australie. Ma Collection". Through the courtesy of Dr. C. Besuchet, of the Museum d'Histoire Naturelle of Geneva, we have been able to examine the holotype of emeryi and to compare it with syntype workers of elegans and a winged female of this species from Nadarivatu, Fiji (E. C. Zimmerman leg.); they show good agreement. We believe that Forel's original locality citation was based on an error, and until contradictory evidence is forthcoming, we consider that emeryi is restricted to Fiji. In addition to Viti Levu, it has been taken on Vanua Levu and Oval au in the Fiji Islands. (Brown and Kempf 1960)