Cataulacus guineensis

Within its range Cataulacus guineensis is the most common Cataulacus species in forested areas of West and Central Africa.

Identification
A member of the guineensis group. The worker is distinguished by the presence of a well-developed spine or tooth upon the posterolateral portion of the pronotum, Other species sharing this feature are separable on characters of sculpturation and size.

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Afrotropical Region: Benin, Cameroun, Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda.

Abundance
Common

Biology
Bolton (1974) - Mature nests are usually populous, containing several hundred workers, and are formed in rotten branches of otherwise healthy trees, often a considerable distance above the ground, The nests are usually begun by a queen entering a tunnel previously made in the branch by wood-boring beetles or termites; the galleries are later extended by the ants themselves, The preference seems to be for branches which are quite unsound and extensively tunelled previously, either by beetles or termites, and the further activities of the ants tends to weaken the branches to such an extent that they may fall off during storms. This was actually observed by the author in 1969 at the Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria station at Gambari, when a rotten branch of a cocoa tree containing a large colony broke away during a rainstorm, The ants were seen later moving their brood up an adjacent cocoa tree where they took up residence in another rotten branch. Forel (1916: 427) recorded this species inhabiting an abandoned wasp nest on the trunk of a tree at Motombe on the Okiavo, Zaire, and noted that at St. Gabriel guineensis was running amicably with a Crematogaster species. This last is not unknown and I have confirmed that guineensis is able to occupy trees in areas dominated by both Crematogaster striatula and Crematogaster clariventris; however, guineensis seems to be excluded from areas infested with the rather belligerent Crematogaster depressa, along with many other arboreal forms. Workers of guineensis have been observed tending aphids and small coccids but, although the workers spend much time wandering upon the tree and occasionally descend to the ground, predatory behaviour has not been noted.

When approached by a potential predator the reaction of the individual ant varies, apparently with the size of the attacker. Workers of guineensis occurring upon a tree dominated by Oecophylla longinoda will try to avoid contact with workers of that species. If that is impossible, they become completely immobile and rely upon their armour for protection. If, however, the aggressor persists in its attentions, or if the predator is large, the guineensis worker rolls up, releases its grip on the bark and escapes by falling into the undergrowth. Wheeler (1922a : 199) recorded this species from the stomachs of the toads Bufo tuberosus Gunther and B. polycercus Werner.

Yanoviak et al. 2005, 2007, 2008 - Cataulacus guineensis has been collected from a nest in the canopy of a secondary-forest tree, in sampling conducted in tree crowns, in Gamba, Gabon. It was anecdotally reported to be subordinate at tuna baits. C. guineensis has been shown to exhibit directed movement while in freefall that allows workers that fall or purposely detach from a tree to glide back and regain a hold on the same tree trunk. This gliding behavior is shared with numerous members of the tribe Cephalotini, and other genera as well.

Castes
Workers can be quite variable in size, even within a single nest.

Nomenclature

 *  guineensis. Cataulacus guineensis Smith, F. 1853: 225, pl. 20, fig. 5 (w.) "TROPICAL WEST AFRICA". Santschi, 1910c: 390 (q.); Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 199 (m.). Senior synonym of sulcatus: Forel, 1910e: 421; of alenensis, fernandensis, parallelus, sulcatus, sulcinodis: Bolton, 1974a: 55.
 * parallelus. Cataulacus parallelus Smith, F. 1853: 226, pl. 19, fig. 6 (q.) SOUTH AFRICA (locality in error). Junior synonym of guineensis: Bolton, 1974a: 55.
 * sulcinodis. Cataulacus guineensis r. sulcinodis Emery, 1892d: 563, pl. 15, fig. 8 (w.) IVORY COAST. Raised to species: Dalla Torre, 1893: 139. Subspecies of guineensis: Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 913. Junior synonym of guineensis: Bolton, 1974a: 55.
 * alenensis. Cataulacus sulcatus var. alenensis Stitz, 1910: 137 (w.) EQUATORIAL GUINEA. Subspecies of guineensis: Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 913. Junior synonym of guineensis: Bolton, 1974a: 55.
 * fernandensis. Cataulacus sulcatus var. fernandensis Stitz, 1910: 137 (w.) EQUATORIAL GUINEA (Bioko I.). Subspecies of guineensis: Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 913. Junior synonym of guineensis: Bolton, 1974a: 55.
 * sulcatus. Cataulacus sulcatus Stitz, 1910: 136, figs. 4-6 (w.q.m.) CAMEROUN. Subspecies of guineensis: Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 913. Junior synonym of guineensis: Forel, 1910e: 421; Bolton, 1974a: 55.

Bolton (1974) - The majority of the synonyms were based on variation in sculpturation in the worker, but parallelus was founded on what is now known to be a perfectly ordinary female of guineensis, The only strange thing about parallelus is its type locality, given by Smith as Cape of Good Hope. Arnold (1917:402) noted that the species did not appear to have been recorded since Smith's time and the present survey seems to indicate that South Africa is outside the range of guineensi. It seems probable that the locality is an error.

In Stitz's description of sulcatus he recognizes the affinity of his species to erinaceus but was not aware that he was dealing with a known species, The synonymy of sulcatus to guineensis occurred in the same year as the publication by Stitz, but the varieties alenensis and fernandensis continued to be used. These were based on smaller workers and sculptural differences were invoked to maintain their separation, However, Santschi (1937b: 102) noted that the individuals of the var, alensis [sic] were very variable in sculpturation, and the present study has shown that these variations are in fact of quite common occurrence in normal nests.

Worker
Bolton (1974) - TL 4.5 – 8.6, HL 1.14 – 2.04, HW 1.30 – 2.40, CI 114 - 121, EL 0.38 – 0.62, OI 26 - 30, IOD 1.00 – 1.72, SL 0.74 – 1.22, SI 50 - 57, PW 1.04 – 1.94, AL 1.30 – 2.34, MTL 0.74 – 1.36 (10 measured).

Occipital crest absent although the vertex is usually separated from the occiput by an obtuse angle. More rarely the two surfaces join through a continuous curve. Occipital corners with a single acute tooth. Sides of head behind eyes denticulate, often strongly so. Pronotum marginate laterally, the margins with usually 2-4 rather large denticles and terminating posterolaterally in a large spine or tooth which is very distinct, being several times larger than any of the denticles preceding it upon the margin. Sides of mesonotum and propodeum rounded, immarginate, usually without denticles. Propodeum with a pair of very long, divergent spines. Promesonotal suture variable in development, usually present as a faint impression upon the dorsal alitrunk, rarely more strongly developed but often completely absent. First gastral tergite not marginate laterally.

Sculpturation extremely variable. Dorsum of head usually with a very fine, loose rugoreticulum which becomes much coarser behind the eyes. Interspaces finely reticulate-punctate but these are often effaced, leaving the surfaces almost smooth. Sculpturation of dorsal alitrunk basically a longitudinal rugulation or sulcate-rugation, with very finely punctured interspaces. Differences in intensity of development of this sculpturation are numerous, and the rugae are often wavy or irregular, especially upon the pronotum. Variation of sculpture on the alitrunk extends from forms in which the entirety of the dorsum is covered with strong, irregular, longitudinal rugae to forms in which the sculpturation is mostly effaced, with just a trace of rugation remaining. The space between the propodeal spines is usually strongly transversely rugose. Pedicel segments coarsely rugose. First gastral tergite reticulate-punctate with scattered fine, predominantly longitudinal rugulae.

Development of stout, erect hairs variable. Usually they are present upon all dorsal surfaces of the head and body but may be reduced both in number and size, and rarely, in some individuals may be almost completely absent. A row of outstanding hairs is always present upon the sides of the head behind the eyes and the lateral margins of the pronotum. Intensity of sculpturation and degree of development of hairs is very often related to the size of the individual, with smaller workers tending to be more hairy and more coarsely sculptured than larger workers.

Queen
Bolton (1974) - TL 7.7 – 9.5, HL 1.72 – 2.06, HW 1.92 – 2.30, CI 111 - 115, EL 0.54 – 0.68, OI 28 - 29, IOD 1.48 – 1.78, SL 1.00 – 1.20, SI 49 - 52, PW 1.76 – 2.12, AL 2.32 – 2.86, MTL 1.10 – 1.34 (5 measured).

As worker, with the pronotal marginal tooth very much reduced or absent and with the propodeal spines relatively much shorter. Pronotum usually quite strongly reticulate-rugose but the mesoscutum longitudinally so. In the females examined the presence of reticulate-punctate interstitial sculpturation upon the alitrunk is rather more strongly developed than is usual in workers, and in some females the rugation of the head has a markedly longitudinal trend.

Male
Bolton (1974) - T L 6.7 – 7.3, HL 1.20 – 1.30, HW 1.42 – 1.46, CI 112 - 118, EL 0.48, OI 32 - 34, IOD 1.10, SL 0.64 – 0.70, SI 45 - 48, PW 1.18 – 1.22, AL 1.14 – 1.22, MTL 1.00 – 1.14 (4 measured).

Structure of head basically similar to that of worker, with dentate occipital corners and denticulate sides behind the eyes. Anterior arms of notauli strongly developed, extending almost the length of the sclerite, scarcely or not at all joined before the suture so that the posterior notaular arm is extremely short or absent. Sides of pronotum marginate and denticulate; propodeum armed with a pair of short but strong, acute spines. Head strongly reticulate-punctate with scattered fine rugulae; the latter tending to form a loose reticulum behind the level of the ocelli. Pronotum similarly sculptured, the reticulations usually widely spaced. Anteromedian portion of mesoscutum with a long, narrowly V-shaped area of unsculptured, polished cuticle; the remainder of the segment sculptured as the pronotum, Propodeum very heavily and coarsely rugose, strongly reticulate-punctate. Erect hairs numerous everywhere.

Type Material
Bolton (1974):

Holotype worker, 'TROPICAL WEST AFRICA' (UM, Oxford) [examined].

Cataulacus parallelus Holotype female, SOUTH AFRICA: Cape of Good Hope [locality probably incorrect] (UM, Oxford) [examined].

Cataulacus guineensis race sulcinodis Holotype worker, IVORY COAST: Assinie (Ch. Alluaud) (MCSN, Genoa).

Cataulacus sulcatus Syntype workers, females, males, CAMEROUN: Jaundestation (Zenker) (MNHU, Berlin) [examined].

Cataulacus sulcatus var. alenensis Syntype workers, EQUATORIAL GUINEA: Alen (Tessmann) (MNHU, Berlin) [examined].

Cataulacus sulcatus var.fernandensis Holotype worker, EQUATORIAL GUINEA: Fernando Po Is. (Zenker) (MNHU, Berlin) [examined].

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

 * André E. 1895. Formicides de l'Ogooué (Congo français). Rev. Entomol. (Caen) 14: 1-5.
 * Arnold G. 1917. A monograph of the Formicidae of South Africa. Part III. Myrmicinae. Annals of the South African Museum. 14: 271-402.
 * Belshaw R., and B. Bolton. 1994. A survey of the leaf litter ant fauna in Ghana, West Africa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 3: 5-16.
 * Bernard F. 1953. La réserve naturelle intégrale du Mt Nimba. XI. Hyménoptères Formicidae. Mémoires de l'Institut Français d'Afrique Noire 19: 165-270.
 * Bolton B. 1974. A revision of the Palaeotropical arboreal ant genus Cataulacus F. Smith (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Entomology 30: 1-105.
 * Bolton B. 1982. Afrotropical species of the myrmicine ant genera Cardiocondyla, Leptothorax, Melissotarsus, Messor and Cataulacus (Formicidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Entomology 45: 307-370.
 * Borowiec L., and S. Salata. 2018. Notes on ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Gambia (Western Africa). Annals of the Upper Silesian Museum in Bytom Entomology 26: 1-13.
 * Braet Y., and B. Taylor. 2008. Mission entomologique au Parc National de Pongara (Gabon). Bilan des Formicidae (Hymenoptera) recoltes. Bulletin S. R. B. E./K.B.V.E. 144: 157-169.
 * Dejean A., F. Azemar, R. Cereghino, M. Leponce, B. Corbara, J. Orivel, and A. Compin. 2015. The dynamics of ant mosaics in tropical rainforests characterized using the SelfOrganizing Map algorithm. Insect Science doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12208
 * Dufour B. 1991. Place et importance des différentes espèces d'insectes dans l'écologie du CSSV (Cocoa Swollen Shoot Virus) au Togo). Café Cacao Thé 35(3): 197-204.
 * Eidmann H. 1944. Die Ameisenfauna von Fernando Poo. 27. Beitrag zu den Ergebnissen der Westafrika-Expedition. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Syst. Ökol. Geogr. Tiere 76: 413-490.
 * Emery C. 1892. Voyage de M. Ch. Alluaud dans le territoire d'Assinie (Afrique occidentale) en juillet et août 1886. Formicides. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 60: 553-574.
 * Garcia F.H., Wiesel E. and Fischer G. 2013.The Ants of Kenya (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)Faunal Overview, First Species Checklist, Bibliography, Accounts for All Genera, and Discussion on Taxonomy and Zoogeography. Journal of East African Natural History, 101(2): 127-222
 * IZIKO South Africa Museum Collection
 * Kone M., S. Konate, K. Yeo, P. K. Kouassi, and K. E. Linsenmair. 2012. Changes in ant communities along an age gradient of cocoa cultivation in the Oumé region, central Côte dIvoire. Entomological Science 15: 324339.
 * Lévieux J. 1972. Les fourmis de la savane de Lamto (Côte d'Ivoire): éléments de taxonomie. Bulletin de l'Institut Fondamental d'Afrique Noire. Série A. Sciences Naturelles 34: 611-654.
 * Majer J. D. 1976. The ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms: further structural considerations. Journal of Applied Ecology 13: 145-155.
 * Medler J. T. 1980: Insects of Nigeria - Check list and bibliography. Mem. Amer. Ent. Inst. 30: i-vii, 1-919.
 * Menozzi C. 1942. Formiche dell'isola Fernando Poo e del territorio del Rio Muni (Guinea Spagnola). 24. Beitrag zu den wissenschaftlichen Ergebnissen der Forschungsreise H. Eidmann nach Spanisch-Guinea 1939 bis 1940. Zoologischer Anzeiger 140: 164-182.
 * Santschi F. 1910. Formicides nouveaux ou peu connus du Congo français. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 78: 349-400.
 * Santschi F. 1914. Formicides de l'Afrique occidentale et australe du voyage de Mr. le Professeur F. Silvestri. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Zoologia Generale e Agraria della Reale Scuola Superiore d'Agricoltura. Portici 8: 309-385.
 * Santschi F. 1924. Descriptions de nouveaux Formicides africains et notes diverses. II. Revue Zoologique Africaine (Brussels) 12: 195-224.
 * Stitz H. 1910. Westafrikanische Ameisen. I. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 5: 125-151.
 * Tadu Z., C. Djieto-Lordon, R. Babin, Yede, E. B. Messop-Youbi, and A. Fomena. 2013. Influence of insecticide treatment on ant diversity in tropical agroforestry system: some aspect of the recolonization process. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 5(12): 832-844.
 * Taylor B. 1979. Ants of the Nigerian Forest Zone (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). III. Myrmicinae (Cardiocondylini to Meranoplini). Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria Research Bulletin 6: 1-65.
 * Taylor B., N. Agoinon, A. Sinzogan, A. Adandonon, Y. N'Da Kouagou, S. Bello, R. Wargui, F. Anato, I. Ouagoussounon, H. Houngbo, S. Tchibozo, R. Todjhounde, and J. F. Vayssieres. 2018. Records of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Republic of Benin, with particular reference to the mango farm ecosystem. Journal of Insect Biodiversity 8(1): 006–029.
 * Taylor B., and S. F. Adedoyin. 1978. The abundance and interspecific relations of common ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on cocoa farms in western Nigeria. Bull. Ent. Res. 68: 105-121.
 * Wheeler W. M. 1922. Ants of the American Museum Congo expedition. A contribution to the myrmecology of Africa. II. The ants collected by the American Museum Congo Expedition. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 45: 39-269.
 * Wheeler W. M. 1922. Ants of the American Museum Congo expedition. A contribution to the myrmecology of Africa. VIII. A synonymic list of the ants of the Ethiopian region. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 45: 711-1004
 * Yanoviak S. P., B. L. Fisher, and A. Alonso. 2007. Arboreal ant diversity (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a central African forest. African Journal of Ecology. 46(1): 60-66.
 * Yeo K., S. Konate, S. Tiho, and S. K. Camara. 2011. Impacts of land use types on ant communities in a tropical forest margin (Oumé - Cote d'Ivoire). African Journal of Agricultural Research 6(2): 260-274.
 * Yeo K., T. Delsinne, S. Komate, L. L. Alonso, D. Aidara, and C. Peeters. 2016. Diversity and distribution of ant assemblages above and below ground in a West African forest–savannah mosaic (Lamto, Cote d’Ivoire). Insectes Sociaux DOI 10.1007/s00040-016-0527-6