Leptomyrmex tibialis

L. tibialis has been recorded in rainforest, wet sclerophyll and dry sclerophyll. Nests occur in cavities in live or dead trees, and in soil at tree bases.

Identification
The largest of the Leptomyrmex species, L. tibialis can be identified by its large body size (HW 1.68–1.96; WL 4.51–5.13), broad head (CI 0.71–0.79), the 10+ standing hairs on the posterior face of the hind tibia, and its distinctive coloration. The majority of the body is rufotestaceous, with only the gaster, tibiae and distal portions of femora black. This species can be distinguished from its sister species by tibial coloration (pale in Leptomyrmex nigriventris; dark in L. tibialis) and by more pronounced tibial compression in L. tibialis (HTC 0.34–0.49 vs. HTC 0.52–0.66 in L. nigriventris). These two species co-occur in the region of Dorrigo, New South Wales. (Lucky and Ward 2010)

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Australasian Region: Australia.

Nomenclature

 *  tibialis. Leptomyrmex nigriventris var. tibialis Emery, 1895g: 351 (w.) AUSTRALIA. Wheeler, W.M. 1934c: 96 (ergatoid q., m.). Subspecies of nigriventris: Wheeler, W.M. 1934c: 96. Raised to species: Lucky & Ward, 2010: 55. Senior synonym of hackeri: Lucky & Ward, 2010: 55.
 * hackeri. Leptomyrmex nigriventris subsp. hackeri Wheeler, W.M. 1934c: 99 (w.) AUSTRALIA. Junior synonym of tibialis: Lucky & Ward, 2010: 55.

Worker
Lucky and Ward (2010) - HL 2.31–2.63, HW 1.68–1.96, MFC 0.37–0.47, IOD 0.98–1.16, SL 3.77–4.30, EL 0.43–0.52, WL 4.51–5.13, PW 1.46–1.64, DPW 0.53–0.68, HTL 4.96–5.89, HTWmin 0.12–0.21, HTWmax 0.35–0.43, CI 0.71–0.79, SI 2.02–2.26, OI 0.09–0.11, HTC 0.34–0.49.

As in Leptomyrmex nigriventris, but generally larger (HW 1.68–1.96; WL 4.51–5.13 vs. L. nigriventris HW 1.49–1.76; WL 4.32–4.98), with head broader (CI 0.71–0.79 vs. CI 0.66–0.75). Tibiae are dark (vs. rufotestaceous) and more distinctly compressed (HTC 0.34–0.49 vs HTC 0.52–0.66).

Queen
Lucky and Ward (2010) - Head broader than in worker. Three ocelli deeply set into head in triangular formation, the anteriormost one largest, the posterior two smaller. Pronotum, mesonotum and propodeum voluminous, convex. The anterior portion of the mesonotum elevated, the posterior portion with a narrow impression before rising to the metanotal suture. Dorsal face of propodeum slightly concave. Petiole broader and higher than long, with a longitudinally grooved summit. Gaster nearly as high as long, somewhat laterally compressed, larger than in worker. Scapes, femora and tibiae broad, robust.

Surface of body subopaque, shagreened. Queen coloration similar to that of worker ; distal portions of femora deep black.

Male
Lucky and Ward (2010) - HL 1.77–1.98, HW 1.39–1.61, SL 0.72–0.78, EL 0.68–0.79, HTL 4.74–5.14, CI 0.74–0.82, SI 0.47–0.54, SI2 1.26–1.46.

Type Material
Lucky and Ward (2010) - In the original description of L. tibialis Emery (1895) stated that it was “recolté dans le nord du Queensland par M. Podenzana” but this is an evident error since this species does not occur in north Queensland. Moreover, the apparent syntype series in MSNG is from Laidley, in southern Queensland. The series comprises two workers of what is here interpreted as L. tibialis (agreeing with the original description, particularly with regard to tibial compression) and three workers of L. cnemidatus. To fix the identity of this species we have designated one of the non-cnemidatus workers as the lectotype.