Trachymyrmex pomonae

{{Taxobox View/Edit above map data
 * nambr />

{{AntMapsMap}}

Biology
From Rabeling et al. (2007): Trachymyrmex pomonae is the smallest Trachymyrmex species occurring in the United States. In Arizona, T. pomonae lives sympatrically with Trachymyrmex carinatus and Trachymyrmex arizonensis in the Chiricahua, Patagonia, and Pajarito Mountains at elevations of 1200–1700 m. The open woodland habitat in these mountains is dominated by Emory and Gray Oaks (Quercus emoryi and Q. grisea), pinyon pine (Pinus edulis), juniper (Juniperus deppeana), and in some places Chihuahua Pine (Pinus leiophylla). Trachymyrmex pomonae nests in very rocky soil. Nest craters are small, approximately 5 cm in diameter, or absent. When craters are absent, the nests are difficult to find, because the entrance is minute and the ants inconspicuous. Excavated nests had 1–3 fungus chambers distributed from 5–40 cm below the surface; fungus gardens were suspended from the ceiling of the chambers. The largest colony contained 183 workers, 2 dealate queens, 45 pupae and 31 larvae. Although a nuptial flight was not observed directly, winged queens and males were found from 9–25 August in the years 1999, 2001 and 2005. Males were encountered at nest entrances, whereas winged queens were found walking on the ground. The collection dates suggest that T. pomonae disperses in the monsoon season (July–September), after heavy rainfall has softened the clayey loam soil, a habit shared with the other Trachymyrmex in Arizona. Workers forage diurnally in the leaf litter to collect vegetable debris and caterpillar feces, which they use to nourish the fungus garden.

Nomenclature

 *  pomonae. Trachymyrmex pomonae Rabeling & Cover, in Rabeling, Cover, et al. 2007: 14, figs. 12-14 (w.q.m.) U.S.A.

Worker
Diagnosis from Rabeling et al. (2007): HL 0.75–0.95, HW 0.78–0.95, CI 97–103, SL 0.73–0.88, SI 89–100, ML 1.0–1.28. The smallest species of Trachymyrmex in the US (HL 0.75–0.95; HW 0.78–0.95), with relatively short legs and antennal scapes (SI 89–100). Head quadrate (CI 97–103), sides subparallel behind the level of the eye, moderately tapering anteriorly between the eye and mandibular insertion. Posterior margin slightly to moderately concave. In full-face view, preocular carinae short, traversing only about half the distance between the eye and the frontal carinae. Frontal lobes subtriangular or rounded in full-face view, notably asymmetric with the anterior side of the lobe markedly longer than the posterior. Mesosomal teeth generally small in size, sometimes reduced to tubercles. Anterolateral promesonotal teeth short, usually pointed, projecting horizontally, not vertically. Propodeal teeth usually acute, shorter than the distance between the bases. Dorsal surface of the body moderately tuberculate, tuberculi small, tubercular setae short, recurved or straight and erect, tuberculi on sides of mesosoma minute, sometimes absent on sides of pronotum. Color medium reddish-brown.

HOLOTYPE WORKER: HL 0.81, HW 0.87, CI 107, SL 0.78, SI 90, ML 1.17. As in the diagnosis.. Integument of head coarse, sandpaperlike, with curved setae, posterior corners rounded. Dorsal and lateral margins of head tuberculate, largest tuberculi on posterior corners, smaller tuberculi on lateral margin. In full-face view, frontal carinae almost reach dorsal margin of head. In lateral view, preocular carinae form straight line traversing the antennal scrobe by 1/3 its width. Antennal scrobe shallow, not tuberculate, with some short setae in dorsal half of scrobe. Frontal lobes subtriangular with anterior side twice as long as posterior one. Mandibles shiny, striate with 7 teeth/denticles. Antennal scape with abundant appressed setae, surpassing dorsal margin of head by 1.5x its maximum diameter. Mesosomal teeth short and rounded, median pronotal teeth reduced. Each tooth bears several erect, curved setae. Dorsal surface of propodeum with two tuberculate ridges, leading to propodeal teeth; each ridge bearing three tuberculi and several recurved setae. Anterior peduncle of petiole short, less than 1/3 the length of petiolar node. Petiole half as wide as postpetiole. Postpetiole oval in dorsal view, wider than long; posterior margin concave. First gasteric tergite tuberculate with recurved setae; tuberculi small. Color uniformly medium reddish-brown, with a faint, dark stripe on first gastric tergite. Paratype workers: HL 0.75–0.95, HW 0.78–0.95, CI 97–103, SL 0.73–0.88, SI 89–100, ML 1.0–1.28.

Queen
Diagnosis from Rabeling et al. (2007): HL 0.95–1.05, HW 1.05–1.1, CI 105–111, SL 0.9, SI 82–86, ML 1.5–1.55. As in worker diagnosis, but with caste-specific morphology of the mesosoma related to wing bearing and the presence of small ocelli on the head. Dorsoventral pronotal teeth present only as right angles in dorsal view, rather than as a triangular tooth. Ventrolateral pronotal teeth small, broadly triangular. Mesoscutum with coarse longitudinal rugulae, tubercles absent, stiff, suberect setae moderately abundant, inclined posteriorly. First gastric tergite densely and minutely tuberculate, with abundant short, decumbent, slightly recurved setae.

PARATYPE QUEEN: HL 0.96, HW 0.99, CI 103, SL 0.84, SI 85, ML 1.47. As in worker and queen diagnosis, with caste specific structure of mesosomal morphology. Integument of head sandpaperlike, slightly irregular, fine-textured, dull with scattered minute tubercles. Head, tuberculation, frontal and preocular carinae, antennal scrobes and frontal lobes shaped as in worker. Mandibles shiny, striate with 9 teeth/denticles. Antennal scapes with many appressed setae, surpassing posterior corner of head 1x its maximum diameter. Mesosoma with typical morphology of the queen caste. In dorsal view, dorsolateral pronotal teeth short, broad, its peak almost forming a 90° angle, projecting horizontally not vertically. Posterior margin of scutellum slightly concave, edges do not form a distinct tooth. In lateral view, propodeal teeth very short and pointed, approximately 3⁄4 as long as broad at its base. Petiole, postpetiole, and gaster shaped as in workers.

Male
Diagnosis from Rabeling et al. (2007): HL 0.6–0.75. HW 0.6–0.75, CI 100–108, SL 0.6–0.8, SI 93–107, ML 1.3–1.65. Somewhat variable in size, but smaller than other North American Trachymyrmex males (ML 1.3–1.65). Dorsolateral pronotal teeth absent. Ventrolateral pronotal teeth small, triangular. Preocular carinae as described in the key. Posterior corners of head angulate in full-face view and bearing only small tuberculi.

PARATYPE MALE: HL 0.65, HW 0.7, CI 108, SL 0.65, SI 93, ML 1.3. Head broader than long, mandibles short, apical and subapical tooth present, other teeth small to minute, sometimes indistinct or partly to entirely absent. Preocular carinae weakening posteriorly, becoming less conspicuous, broken, or sometimes incomplete as it forms the posterior border of the antennal scrobe. Dorsal surface of head coarsely granulate, finely rugulose, posterior margin with less than 15 small tuberculi, no tooth present on the corners. Posterolateral pronotal teeth short, broadly pyramidal, sometimes rounded. Anterolateral pronotal teeth absent. Sculpture on mesosoma, petiole, postpetiole and gaster coarsely granulate. Fine rugulae present on most of the mesosoma, primarily longitudinal on the mesoscutum, mostly reticulate on the scutellum and on the sides. Rugulae and tuberculi largely absent from the first gastric tergite, but numerous short, appressed, recurved setae present. Head dark blackish brown, scape lighter brown, mandibles and funiculus yellowish brown.

Type Material
Holotype worker (SPC 6330) and the following paratypes: 15 workers, 1 queen [12-VIII- 2001, SPC 6330]; 13 workers [12-VIII-2001, SPC 6328]; 48 workers, 8 queens, 1 male [14-VIII-2001, UGM010814-01]; 34 workers [10-VIII-2005, CR050810-01]. ,, , , , , , and the private collections of Robert A. Johnson (Tempe, AZ, USA), William P. Mackay (El Paso, TX, USA) and Christian Rabeling (Austin, TX, USA). Examined (Rabeling et al. 2007).

Type Locality Information
U.S.A., Arizona: Cochise County, Chiricahua Mountains 0.5 km north of Southwestern Research Station. (Rabeling et al. 2007).

Etymology
In traditional Roman religion, Pomona was the goddess of fruit trees, gardens and orchards. Trachymyrmex pomonae therefore is Pomona’s Trachymyrmex, because the ant’s cultivation of fungus gardens is a highly developed form of “pomology” that would surely please the goddess. (Rabeling et al. 2007).