Cryptomyrmex longinodus

The Brazil specimens from Manaus were collected from soil samples in a locality whose ant fauna is otherwise well-known. No other specimen of this rather distinctive species has ever been collected by traditional techniques. (Fernández 2003)

Identification
Fernández (2004) - Distinguished from Cryptomyrmex boltoni by the smooth and shining thorax, without conspicuous and long rugulae on the sides of the propodeum and mesosoma. The propodeal spines are approximately as long or slightly longer than their bases.

Distribution
Brazil: Bahia and Amazonas.

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Neotropical Region: Brazil.

Castes
Males have yet to be found for this species.

Nomenclature

 * . Adelomyrmex longinodus Fernández & Brandão, in Fernández, 2003b: 20, figs. 57-61, 64, 74 (w.q.) BRAZIL (Amazonas, Espirito Santo).
 * Type-material: holotype worker, 15 paratype workers, 1 paratype queen.
 * Type-locality: holotype Brazil: Amazonas, nr Manaus, 1.iii.1994 (R. Didham); paratypes: 7 workers with same data, 6 workers, 1 queen Amazonas, Manaus, Shift 52, Floresta Berlese funnel no. 04, 3.iii.1998 (M. Garcia et al.), 1 worker Amazonas, Manaus, Rs 3114 20, i.1994 (A.B. Casimiro), 1 worker Brazil: Espirito Santo, Linhares, 7.vii.1994, no. 4869 (A.B. Casimiro).
 * Type-depositories: BMNH (holotype); BMNH, CPDC, IAVH, ICNB, INPA, MCZC, MZSP, PSWC, SMNK (paratypes).
 * Combination in Cryptomyrmex: Fernández, 2004b: 332.
 * Status as species: Fernández, 2004b: 333.
 * Distribution: Brazil.

Worker
(Paratypes= 4). HL 0.55–0.57 HW 0.50–0.52 SL 0.36–0.37 EL 0.04 –0.05 WL 0.63–0.67 GL 0.50–0.55 TL 2.30–2.44 CI 90–91 SI 71–72.

Head with convex posterior and evenly rounded corners. Hypostomal bridge strong and evenly developed; very much distinct from head venter. Hypostomal teeth absent. Sides of head slightly concave before the eyes, slightly convex past eyes. Mandibles with 4 teeth decreasing in size from the apical teeth, the antepenultimate (subbasal) smallest. Mandibles with tooth in their basal margin, not followed by a notch. Palp formula 1,2. Maxillary palpomere subcylindrical and the labial palps geniculate; the apical segment much enlarged and globose. Eyes lenses absent, although the pigments are clearly visible under the reflective light, but not under the SEM picture. Clypeus short, elevated in the middle as a narrow stripe, pointed and fused with frontal carinae. Anterior margin of the clypeus without teeth, although with feebly projections instead. Dorsal view of thorax as in Fig. 60. From above, the promesonotum is heart shaped, ending in a triangular mesonotum. Pronotal humeri very broadly rounded in dorsal view, the dorsal alitrunk pinched in at the metanotal line. Propodeum spiracle relatively large, its orifice circular and situated just above the midlength of the sclerite; propodeum dorsum straight, meeting declivity in sharp diverging teeth, gently curved inwards when seen from above; declivity smooth, the metapleural lobes not joined over the foramen. Opening of the metapleural gland indistinct (Fig. 61). Petiole with a short anterior peduncle, lacking an anteroventral process; petiolar node subquadrate, dorsally broadly convex in profile until it approaches the postpetiole where it ends abruptly in a right angle. Postpetiole low and small, gently convex in profile, in dorsal view very broadly attached to the gaster. In profile the postpetiole articulated medially on the first gastral segment. Sting large and strongly sclerotized, disproportionately powerful. Head, most of promesonotum, sides of pronotum and gaster smooth and shining; propodeal triangle and sides of petiole and postpetiole with coarse rugae more or less longitudinal on petiole and postpetiole. Posterior face of propodeum deep, smooth and shining. Petiole with rugulae concentric around node, dorsally transverse and longitudinal on sides; sides of postpetiole with oblique rugulae, smooth and shining in the top, mandibles smooth and shining. Abundant fine hairs long and flexuous on body, shorter and appressed on antennae and legs. Body dark brown (including hairs), antennae and legs lighter.

Queen
Paratype. HL 0.54 HW 0.51 SL 0.22 WL 0.66.

Larger, but not very much, than conspecific worker. Compound eyes with several facets over the largest diameter. Otherwise description as worker.

Type Material
Holotype worker: BRASIL: Amazonas, near Manaus, 1.iii.94, R. Didham leg. (deposited in ). Paratypes: 7 paratype w, same data as holotype, deposited in BMNH,, , ,. 1 paratype q and 6 paratype w, BRAZIL: Amazonas, Manaus, Shift 52, Floresta Berlese funnel No. 04, 03.iii.98, M: García et al. leg., deposited as follow: 1 worker in, 3 workers (2 coated with gold) and dealated queen in MZSP, 1 worker in , 1 worker in. 1 worker, BRAZIL: Amazonas, Manaus, Rs 3114 20, i.1994 A.B. Casimiro (Deposited in CEPLAC). 1 worker, BRAZIL: Espiritu Santo, Linhares, 7.vii.1994, A.B. Casimiro No. 4869 (Deposited in CEPLAC).

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

 * Fichaux M., B. Bechade, J. Donald, A. Weyna, J. H. C. Delabie, J. Murienne, C. Baraloto, and J. Orivel. 2019. Habitats shape taxonomic and functional composition of Neotropical ant assemblages. Oecologia 189(2): 501-513.
 * Franco W., N. Ladino, J. H. C. Delabie, A. Dejean, J. Orivel, M. Fichaux, S. Groc, M. Leponce, and R. M. Feitosa. 2019. First checklist of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of French Guiana. Zootaxa 4674(5): 509-543.
 * Medeiros Macedo L. P., E. B. Filho, amd J. H. C. Delabie. 2011. Epigean ant communities in Atlantic Forest remnants of São Paulo: a comparative study using the guild concept. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 55(1): 7578.
 * Siqueira de Castro F., A. B. Gontijo, P. de Tarso Amorim Castro, and S. Pontes Ribeiro. 2012. Annual and Seasonal Changes in the Structure of Litter-Dwelling Ant Assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Atlantic Semideciduous Forests. Psyche doi:10.1155/2012/959715
 * Siqueira de Castro F., A. B. Gontijo, W. Duarte da Rocha, and S. Pontes Ribeiro. 2011. As comunidades de formigas de serapilheira nas florestas semidecíduas do Parque Estadual do Rio Doce, Minas Gerais. MG.BIOTA, Belo Horizonte 3(5): 5-24.