Dorymyrmex insanus

One of a number of species throughout that world that have earned their common name, crazy ant, from their noticeably frenetic foraging-activity. Among other species given this moniker D. insanus has the distinction of bearing a latin name that matches its common name.

Identification
Dorymyrmex insanus is one of a confusing tangle of western Dorymyrmex forms that are in need of taxonomic revision. The species of southwestern North America have been shifted between different genera and species names numerous times over the past 100 + years. Snelling (1995) nicely summed up the plethora of problems with insanus: "No North American ant has been cursed with such a singularly unfortunate taxonomic history as that described by Buckley (1866) as Formica insana."

Fisher and Cover (2007) state "In all Dorymyrmex, the propodeum has a single, more or less vertical tooth, or "cone," at the junction of the dorsal and posterior faces." If you find a worker ant within the confines of the Colorado Plateau with this morphology you have collected a Dorymyrmex species. If the workers possess a black gaster and light colored (various shades of yellow- red) head and mesosoma, you have collected Dorymyrmex bicolor. If the workers are concolorous brown or gray your best solution, pending a revision of the group, may be to provisionally assign it the name insanus.

Cuezzo and Guerrero (2011) provided the following diagnosis but its accuracy is questionable until a more thorough revision of the Dorymyrmex is completed: Worker Medium brown to dark. Head longer than wide, lateral sides parallel and slightly convex. Posterior margin of head with a weak median emargination. Pronotum with 0–2 erect setae. Pro-mesonotum slightly convex with a weak subangle behind, forming a feeble tubercle in the same line of propodeum in profile. Queen Maximum cephalic width at the level of compound eyes, weakly narrow behind. Male Dark brown to black. Maximum head width after level of eyes. Posterior margin of head feebly concave in the middle; only three teeth present on the masticatory margin of the mandible. Forewing with no discoidal nor cubital cells.

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Nearctic Region: United States. Neotropical Region: Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, El Salvador, Greater Antilles, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Venezuela.

Range SW United States and N Mexico. Difficulty in delimiting the various forms in this group leads to some ambiguity concerning its distribution.

Biology
These ants, like all North American Dorymyrmex, thrive in hot, open xeric habitats. Workers are opportunistic predators that can quickly recruit many individuals to newly discovered food. Their diet is quite varied. Foragers will readily imbibe honeydew, or any nutritious liquids they encounter, but will also feed on vertebrate carcasses.

and Foraging Behavior
A number of factors help make these ants a conspicuous part of the southwestern U.S. ant fauna. Nests occur in open ground or in sites with a low profile vegetative ground cover. Their ability to thrive in hot, open dry areas allows them to also do well in disturbed sites. This in turn puts them into direct contact with anyone that spends time outside, be it out in the desert or in heavily settled areas, in the southwest. Their ground nest entrances are small holes in the ground that would be relatively inconspicuous except for the small crater mounds (up to ~ 10 cm in diameter) of soil that surround them. These mounds are made all the more obvious by their tendency to occur in clusters.

In Colombia, Dorymyrmex insanus is commonly found in lowlands. This species nests close to the sea level (75m.) in anthropic sub-xerophytic deciduous forests and in temporal cultivated areas. Some populations are restricted to arid and open areas of central Colombia, between 400 and 700 m, where small herbs cover the ground.

Workers tend to be quite active and tolerate heat better than most species that they co-occur with - although they will stop foraging during the most intense heat of the day during the warmest times of the year. Foragers can form long foraging trails that contain many individuals. These streams of undulating ants flow over, under or around objects that are in the path of such a trail. While individuals workers are small, their dark coloration often contrasts with the lighter soils where they make their nests. Quick movements, foraging trails full of workers, creating small but often conspicuous soil mounds, and an ability to be out in force during hot, sunny days when most ants remain in their nests all make Dorymyrmex insanus a noticeable ant.

Conservation Status
Cuezzo and Guerrero (2011) - D. insanus was considered as a vulnerable species by de IUNC Red List as fitting the “D2” criteria of the vulnerable (VU) category in the “1994 Categories & Criteria,” meaning the population has an acute restriction in its area of occupancy (typically less than 100 km2) or in the number of locations (typically less than five). With the distributional data provided here, this species can be considered to exceed the above criteria and, therefore, should be removed from the list of endangered species.

Castes

 * Worker

Nomenclature

 *  insanus. Formica insana Buckley, 1866: 165 (w.q.) U.S.A. Cuezzo & Guerrero, 2011: 18 (m.). Combination in Dorymyrmex: McCook, 1879: 185; in D. (Conomyrma): Smith, M.R. 1951a: 837; in Conomyrma: Snelling, R.R. 1973b: 4; in Dorymyrmex: Shattuck, 1992c: 85. Junior synonym of pyramicus: Mayr, 1886d: 433; Wheeler, W.M. 1902f: 22. Revived from synonymy as subspecies of pyramicus: Santschi, 1920d: 381. Junior synonym of pyramicus: Creighton, 1950a: 348. Revived from synonymy as species: Snelling, R.R. 1973b: 5. Material of the unavailable name antillana referred here: Snelling, R.R. 1973b: 5. See also: Buren, Nickerson & Thompson, 1976: 306; Shattuck, 1994: 84; Snelling, R.R. 1995: 3.

This species name has long been a cause for consternation. No type material was designated with the original description, and the description is quite vague. This is made more troublesome by our contemporary knowledge that workers in this genus show few distinguishing characteristics. The name Dorymyrmex insanus has in the past been assigned to specimens from North, Central and South America, as well as the Caribbean. Trager (1988) described some species from the southeastern United States that had previously been referred to D. insanus and Snelling (2005) clarified Caribbean Dorymyrmex were all assignable to the distinctive Dorymyrmex antillanus. This eliminated the range of D. insanus from including these areas, and is one of the few seemingly unambiguously correct revisionary changes that correctly apply to D. insanus. Subsequent treatments of this ant (Johnson 1989, Snelling 1995, Cuezzo and Guerrero 2011) differed in their conclusions about the identity and species boundaries of D. insanus. There is clearly a need for a more thorough and careful revision, including the use of molecular genetic evidence from many samples across the full breadth of the range of Dorymyrmex, to resolve problems with this name and sibling species with similar worker forms. Only then will it be clear if the Cuezzo and Guerrero (2011) description given below provides a solution to providing the best possible description of the ant D. insanus.

Worker
Cuezzo and Guerrero (2011) - (n = 55): HL: 0.78–1.16; HW: 0.70–1.00; EL: 0.22–0.57; EW: 0.15–0.22; SL: 0.80–1.12; WL: 1.08–1.44; CI: 79–96; SI: 74–119; REL: 25–71; OI: 26–82; TLI: 125–147.

Head, mesosoma, and gaster medium brown to dark; some specimens are almost black. Head and dorsal part of mesosoma covered with a dense and whitish pubescence but lighter than in D. brunneus. Head: subquadrate, convex laterally. Compound eyes placed in first cephalic third. Scape surpassing the posterior margin of head by 1/3 of its length. Posterior margin of head concave medially. Psammophore with short setae, disposed in a double file, forming a semicircle; the hairs in the top line are disposed far from the foramen magnum and do not reach the oral cavity. Mesosoma: profile interrupted in the middle, promesonotal profile higher than apical summit of propodeal tubercle. Mesonotal sclerite, in profile, forming an angle defining two faces, one dorsal and one posterior but not forming a real tubercle. In profile, the dorsal face of propodeum is feebly sinuate. Metasoma: petiolar scale directed dorsally. No ventral petiolar process.

Male
Cuezzo and Guerrero (2011) - (n = 4): HL: 0.55–0.6; HW: 0.58–0.63; EL: 0.25–0.28; EW: 0.15; SL: 0.25–0.28; WL: 1.08–1.23.

Body dark brown, mandibles yellowish brown except masticatory margin which is reddish brown. Whitish pubescence covering all the body. Head: square with round occipital corner; posterior margin of head feebly concave in the middle. Mandible falcate, with subparallel inner and outer sides, with only three teeth: apical tooth three times longer than the preapical one; there is no well differentiated angle between masticatory and basal margins; basal margin completely devoid of tooth or denticles. Posteriormargin of clypeus wide, reaching torulus; anterior margin of clypeus convex. Scape long (> or = to EL) surpassing posterior margin of compound eye; pedicel as long as each flagellomere. Compound eye large, exceeding the lateral margin of head. Hyaline ocelli well developed; lateral ocelli placed close to the posterior cephalic margin. Mesosoma: pronotum projected forwards as an elbow; parapsidal furrows strongly divergent, reaching the middle part of pronotum. Mesonotum twice longer than wide in lateral view. Anepisternum and katepisternum completely divided by a mesopleural suture. Profile of propodeum continuous, dorsal and declivitous faces not well defined. Forewing with no discoidal nor cubital cell. Hindwing with 0–3 closed cells.Hamuli with 12 hooks. Metasoma: petiole low; scale apically rounded in lateral view; ventral petiolar process short. Pygostyle short, stout and covered with white, erect setae. Stout paramere, differentiated from volsella by a sulcus; digitus curved surpassing the volsellae in length, no cuspis present; aedeagus ventrally serrate.

Type Material
Neotype. 1w, Interstate 20, 12 mi E Big Spring,Howard Co., Texas, USA, 16 April 1981, coll.byW. F. Buren, designated by Snelling 1995.

Etymology
Descriptive. Buckley's original description included a parenthetic addition "Crazy Ant" following the listing of the proper name. Both insanus (= insane) and crazy ant are fitting for characterizing these Dorymyrmex's frenetic movements and their ability to swarm upon and engulf prey, enemies and other food items.

Determination Clarifications
Despite the certainty expressed in the following passage, the validity of past and present determinations of this species are difficult to assess (see the beginning of this section and the identification section above for additional details).

Cuezzo and Guerrero (2011) - Taxonomical limits of this species are here clearly defined. In the past, the names of Dorymyrmex pyramicus and D. insanus were used as synonyms, in a sort of confusion, considering both species as one with a wide distributional range (from Texas, USA, to Argentina). Snelling (1995) was the first to recognize this mistake and to propose a clear description of D. insanus, designating a neotype worker and neoparatypes. According to him, D. insanus can be found from Central Texas to Kansas and westward to Northern California. In the same paper, Snelling says that the southern limit of its range is unclear in part due to inadequate collecting. With new material examined from Central and South America, we can confirm the presence of D. insanus in Central America and in the northern part of South America.

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

 * Adams T. A., W. J. Staubus, and W. M. Meyer. 2018. Fire impacts on ant assemblages in California sage scrub. Southwestern Entomologist 43(2): 323-334.
 * Allred D. M. 1982. Ants of Utah. The Great Basin Naturalist 42: 415-511.
 * Allred, D.M. 1982. The ants of Utah. Great Basin Naturalist 42:415-511.
 * Andersen A. N. 1997. Functional Groups and Patterns of Organization in North American Ant Communities: A Comparison with Australia. Journal of Biogeography. 24: 433-460
 * Bestelmeyer B. T., and J. A. Wiens. 2001. Local and regional-scale responses of ant diversity to a semiarid biome transition. Ecography 24: 381-392.
 * Boer P. 2019. Ants of Curacao, species list. Accessed on January 22 2019 at http://www.nlmieren.nl/websitepages/SPECIES%20LIST%20CURACAO.html
 * Brandao, C.R.F. 1991. Adendos ao catalogo abreviado das formigas da regiao neotropical (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Rev. Bras. Entomol. 35: 319-412.
 * Castano-Meneses, G., M. Vasquez-Bolanos, J. L. Navarrete-Heredia, G. A. Quiroz-Rocha, and I. Alcala-Martinez. 2015. Avances de Formicidae de Mexico. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
 * Chiotis M., L. S. Jermiin, and R. H. Crozier. 2000. A molecular framework for the phylogeny of the ant subfamily Dolichoderinae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17: 108-116.
 * Cokendolpher J. C., and O. F. Francke. 1990. The ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of western Texas. Part II. Subfamilies Ecitoninae, Ponerinae, Pseudomyrmecinae, Dolichoderinae, and Formicinae. Special Publications, the Museum. Texas Tech University 30:1-76.
 * Cover S. P., and R. A. Johnson. 20011. Checklist of Arizona Ants. Downloaded on January 7th at http://www.asu.edu/clas/sirgtools/AZants-2011%20updatev2.pdf
 * Cuezzo F. and Guerrero, R. J. 2011. The ant genus Dorymyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Dolichoderinae) in Colombia. Psyche 2012, Article ID 516058 (doi:10.1155/2012/516058): 24 pp
 * Dattilo W. et al. 2019. MEXICO ANTS: incidence and abundance along the Nearctic-Neotropical interface. Ecology https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2944
 * Des Lauriers J., and D. Ikeda. 2017. The ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the San Gabriel Mountains of Southern California, USA with an annotated list. In: Reynolds R. E. (Ed.) Desert Studies Symposium. California State University Desert Studies Consortium, 342 pp. Pages 264-277.
 * DuBois M. B. 1981. New records of ants in Kansas, III. State Biological Survey of Kansas. Technical Publications 10: 32-44
 * Dubois, M.B. and W.E. Laberge. 1988. An Annotated list of the ants of Illionois. pages 133-156 in Advances in Myrmecology, J. Trager
 * Eastlake Chew A. and Chew R. M. 1980. Body size as a determinant of small-scale distributions of ants in evergreen woodland southeastern Arizona. Insectes Sociaux 27: 189-202
 * Fernandes, P.R. XXXX. Los hormigas del suelo en Mexico: Diversidad, distribucion e importancia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).
 * Fernández Triana J. L., J. L. Fontenla, E. Portuondo Ferrer, and J. A. Genaro. 2005. Especies de himenópteros registrados en el Parque Nacional La Bayamesa, Cuba, 17-22 de junio del 2003 y 2-10 de febrero del 2004. In Maceira F., D., A.Fong G., W. S. Alverson, y/and T. Wachter, eds. 2005. Cuba: Parque Nacional La Bayamesa. Rapid Biological Inventories Report 13. The Field Museum, Chicago.
 * Fernández, F. and S. Sendoya. 2004. Lista de las hormigas neotropicales. Biota Colombiana Volume 5, Number 1.
 * Flores, C. P., J. A. R. Garza, and A. E. C. Ramirez. 2004. Conocimiento Tlapaneco de hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de Malinaltepec, Guerrero, Mexico. Etnobiologia 4: 19-28.
 * Fontanla Rizo J.L. 1997. Lista preliminar de las hormigas de Cuba. Cocuyo 6: 18-21.
 * Fontenla Rizo J. L. 1997. Lista preliminar de las hormigas de Cuba (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Cocuyo 6: 18-21.
 * General D., and L. Thompson. 2008. New distributional records of ants in Arkansas. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science 62: 148-150.
 * Greenberg L., M. Martinez, A. Tilzer, K. Nelson, S. Koening, and R. Cummings. 2015. Comparison of different protocols for control of the Red Imported Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in Orange County, California, including a list of co-occurring ants. Southwestern Entomologist 40(2): 297-305.
 * Hernandez, F. Varela and G. Castano-Meneses. 2010. Checklist, Biological Notes and Distribution of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Barranca de Metztitlán Biosphere Reserve, Hidalgo, Mexico. Sociobiology 56(2):397-434
 * Holway D.A. 1998. Effect of Argentine ant invasions on ground-dwelling arthropods in northern California riparian woodlands. Oecologia. 116: 252-258
 * Ipser R. M. 2004. Native and exotic ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Georgia: Ecological Relationships with implications for development of biologically-based management strategies. Doctor of Philosophy thesis, University of Georgia. 165 pages.
 * Ipser, R.M., M.A. Brinkman, W.A. Gardner and H.B. Peeler. 2004. A Survey of Ground-Dwelling Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Georgia. The Florida Entomologist 87(3) 253-260.
 * Ivanov K. 2015. Checklist of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Ohio. Conference: Ohio Natural History Conference, At Columbus OH
 * Johnson C. 1989. Taxonomy and Diagnosis of Conomyrma insane (Buckley) and C. flava (McCook) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insecta Mundi. 3: 179-194
 * Johnson R. Personnal Database. Accessed on February 5th 2014 at http://www.asu.edu/clas/sirgtools/resources.htm
 * Johnson, R.A. and P.S. Ward. 2002. Biogeography and endemism of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Baja California, Mexico: a first overview. Journal of Biogeography 29:10091026/
 * Jusino-Atresino R., and S. A. Phillips, Jr. 1992. New ant records for Taylor Co., Texas. The Southern Naturalist 34(4): 430-433.
 * Kaspari, M. and T.J. Valone. 2002. On Ectotherm Abundance in a Seasonal Environment-Studies of a Desert Ant Assemblage. Ecology 83(11):2991-2996
 * LaBrun, E.G. and D.H. Feener Jr. 2007. When trade-offs interact: balance of terror enforces dominance discovery trade-off in a local ant assemblage. Journal of Animal Ecology 76:58-64
 * Longino, J.T. 2010. Personal Communication. Longino Collection Database
 * MacKay W. P. 1993. Succession of ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on low-level nuclear waste sites in northern New Mexico. Sociobiology 23: 1-11.
 * Mackay, W., D. Lowrie, A. Fisher, E. Mackay, F. Barnes and D. Lowrie. 1988. The ants of Los Alamos County, New Mexico (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). pages 79-131 in J.C. Trager, editor, Advances in Myrmecololgy.
 * Matsuda T., G. Turschak, C. Brehme, C. Rochester, M. Mitrovich, and R. Fisher. 2011. Effects of Large-Scale Wildfires on Ground Foraging Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Southern California. Environmental Entomology 40(2): 204-216.
 * McDonald D. L., D. R. Hoffpauir, and J. L. Cook. 2016. Survey yields seven new Texas county records and documents further spread of Red Imported Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren. Southwestern Entomologist, 41(4): 913-920.
 * Miguelena J. G., and P. B. Baker. 2019. Effects of urbanization on the diversity, abundance, and composition of ant assemblages in an arid city. Environmental Entomology doi: 10.1093/ee/nvz069.
 * Mirmecofauna de la reserva ecologica de San Felipe Bacalar
 * Nash M. S., W. G. Whitford, J. Van Zee, and K. M. Havstad. 2000. Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) responses to environmental stressors in the Northern Chihuahuan Desert. Environ. Entomol, 29(2): 200-206.
 * O'Keefe S. T., J. L. Cook, T. Dudek, D. F. Wunneburger, M. D. Guzman, R. N. Coulson, and S. B. Vinson. 2000. The Distribution of Texas Ants. The Southwestern Entomologist 22: 1-92.
 * Portuondo E. F., and J. L. Reyes. 2002. Mirmecofauna de los macizos montañosos de Sierra Maestra y Nipe-Sagua-Baracoa. Cocuyo 12: 10-13
 * Portuondo E. F., and J. L. Reyes. 2006. Species of Hymenoptera recorded in the Reserva Ecológica Pico Mogote, Santiago de Cuba Province, 20-25 September 2002. In: Maceira F., D., A. Fong G., y/and W. S. Alverson, eds. 2006. Cuba: Pico Mogote. Rapid Biological Inventories Report 09. The Field Museum, Chicago.
 * Portuondo E. F., and J. L. Reyes. 2006. Species of hymenopterans recorded in Siboney-Juticí Ecological Reserve, Santiago de Cuba Province, compiled from collections during the rapid inventory of 27-28 September 2002. Fong G., A., D. Maceira F., W. S. Alverson, y / and J. M. Shopland, eds. 2005. Cuba: Siboney-Juticí. Rapid Biological Inventories Report 10. The Field Museum, Chicago.
 * Portuondo Ferrer E., and J. L. Fernández Triana. 2005. Species of hymenopterans (bees, wasps, and ants) recorded in Alejandro de Humboldt National Park, from literature records, revision of the collection at BIOECO, and collections before and during the rapid inventory, 12-22 February 2004. In Fong G., A., D. Maceira F., W. S. Alverson, y/and T. Wachter, eds. 2005. Cuba: Parque Nacional Alejandro de Humboldt. Rapid Biological Inventories Report 14. The Field Museum, Chicago.
 * Portuondo Ferrer, E. and J. Fernandez Triana. Biodiversidad del orden Hymenoptera en Los Macizos Montanosos de Cuba Oriental. Boletin S.E.A. 35:121-136.
 * Quiroz Robledo L. N., and J. E. Valenzuela Gonzalez. 1993. Contribucion al conocimiento de la mirmecofauna del estado de Hidalgo, Mexico (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). En: Villavicencio-Nieto (ed) Flora y Fauna del Estado de Hidalgo. Universidad Autónoma de Hidalgo. p. 340-393. ISBN 968-63 40-36-X
 * Reyes, J. L.. "Inventario de la colección de hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) del Centro Oriental de Ecosistemas y Biodiversidad, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba." Boletín de la Sociedad Aragonesa 36 (2005): 279-283.
 * Reynoso-Campos J. J., J. A. Rodriguez-Garza, and M. Vasquez-Bolanos. 2015. Hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de la Isla Cozumel, Quintana Roo, Mexico (pp. 27-39). En: Castaño Meneses G., M. Vásquez-Bolaños, J. L. Navarrete-Heredia, G. A. Quiroz-Rocha e I. Alcalá-Martínez (Coords.). Avances de Formicidae de  México.  UNAM,  Universiad  de  Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco.
 * Rico-Gray,V., J.G. Garcia-Franco, M. Palacios-Rios, C. Diaz-Castelazo, V. Parra-Tabla and J.A. Navarro. 1998. Geographical and Seasonal Variation in the Richness of Ant-Plant Interactions in Mexico. Biotropica 30(2):190-200.
 * Rios-Casanova, L., A. Valiente-Banuet, and V. Rico-Gray. (2004). Las hormigas del Valle de Tehuacan (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): una comparacion con otras zonas aridas de Mexico. Acta Zoologica Mexicana 20: 37-54.
 * Rivers, A., M. Barbercheck, B. Govaerts, and N. Verhulst. 2016. Conservation agriculture affects arthropod community composition in a rainfed maize-wheat system in central Mexico. Applied Soil Ecology 100: 81-90.
 * Roeder K. A., and D. V. Roeder. 2016. A checklist and assemblage comparison of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge in Oklahoma. Check List 12(4): 1935.
 * Rojas M. L. 2012. Fauna de insectos en cayos del golfo de Ana María, Cuba. Rev. Invest. Mar. 32(2): 66-72.
 * Shattuck S. O. 1994. Taxonomic catalog of the ant subfamilies Aneuretinae and Dolichoderinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). University of California Publications in Entomology 112: i-xix, 1-241.
 * Snelling R.R. 1995. Systematics of Nearctic Ants of the Genus Dorymyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Contributions in Science. 454: 1-14
 * Snelling, R.R. 1995. Sytematics of Nearctic ants of the genus Dorymyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Contributions in Science Natural Histrory Museum of Los Angeles County 454:1-14
 * Staubus W. J., E. S. Boyd, T. A. Adams, D. M. Spear, M. M. Dipman, W. M. Meyer III. 2015. Ant communities in native sage scrub, non-native grassland, and suburban habitats in Los Angeles County, USA: conservation implications. Journal of Insect Conservervation 19:669–680
 * Van Pelt A., and J. B. Gentry. 1985. The ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Savannah River Plant, South Carolina. Dept. Energy, Savannah River Ecology Lab., Aiken, SC., Report SRO-NERP-14, 56 p.
 * Van Pelt, A. 1983. Ants of the Chisos Mountains, Texas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) . Southwestern Naturalist 28:137-142.
 * Vasquez Bolanos M., and J. Escoto Rocha. 2018. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Aguascalientes. Investigacion y Ciencia 24(68): 36-40.
 * Vásquez-Bolaños M. 2011. Lista de especies de hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) para México. Dugesiana 18: 95-133
 * Ward P. S. 1987. Distribution of the introduced Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) in natural habitats of the lower Sacramento Valley and its effects on the indigenous ant fauna. Hilgardia 55: 1-16
 * Ward P.S. and A.M. Boulton. 2002. Checklist of the ants of the Gulf of California Islands. In Island Biogeography of the sea of Cortes. T.J. Case, M.L. Cody and E. Ezcurra Editors. 690 pp.
 * Wetterer, J. K.; Ward, P. S.; Wetterer, A. L.; Longino, J. T.; Trager, J. C.; Miller, S. E. 2000. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Santa Cruz Island, California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 99:25-31.
 * Wetterer, J.K., P.S. Ward, A.L. Wetterer, J.T. Longino, J.C. Trager and S.E. Miller. 2000. Ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) of Santa Cruz Island, California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science 99(1):25-31.
 * Wheeler G. C., and J. Wheeler J. 1989. A checklist of the ants of Oklahoma. Prairie Naturalist 21: 203-210.
 * Wheeler G. C., and J. Wheeler. 1986. The ants of Nevada. Los Angeles: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, vii + 138 pp.
 * Wheeler G. C., and J. Wheeler. 1987. A Checklist of the Ants of South Dakota. Prairie Nat. 19(3): 199-208.
 * Wheeler, G.C. and J. Wheeler. 1985. A checklist of Texas ants. Prairie Naturalist 17:49-64.
 * Wheeler, G.C. and J. Wheeler. 1988. A checklist of the ants of Montana. Psyche 95:101-114
 * Wheeler, G.C. and J. Wheeler. 1988. A checklist of the ants of Wyoming. Insecta Mundi 2(3&4):230-239
 * Whitford W. G. 1978. Structure and seasonal activity of Chihuahua desert ant communities. Insectes Sociaux 25(1): 79-88.
 * Zee, J. and D. Holway. 2006. Nest raiding by the invasive Argentine ant on colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex subnitidus. Insectes Sociaux 53:161-167