Pseudoneoponera bispinosa

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Oriental Region: India. Palaearctic Region: China.

Nomenclature

 * . Pachycondyla bispinosa Smith, F. 1858b: 107 (w.) (“Hab. Australia?”)
 * Type-material: holotype(?) worker.
 * [Note: presumed holotype worker is labelled “type. Sm. Coll. 79. 32”, with no locality data on the label. There is no proof that this specimen is in fact the holotype. If the “79” refers to 1879, as is usual in old BMNH accessions, that would rule out this specimen because the holotype was collected before 1858.]
 * Type-locality: Australia: “Hab. Australia?” (no further data).
 * [Note: type-locality India, after Forel, 1886d: 246, Forel, 1900d: 326, Bingham, 1903: 97.]
 * Type-depository: BMNH.
 * Combination in Ponera (Pachycondyla): Roger, 1861a: 8;
 * combination in Pachycondyla: Mayr, 1863: 439;
 * combination in Bothroponera: Emery, 1889b: 495; Bingham, 1903: 97;
 * combination in Pachycondyla (Bothroponera): Emery, 1901a: 45;
 * combination in Pseudoneoponera: Schmidt, C.A. & Shattuck, 2014: 135.
 * Junior synonym of rufipes: Forel, 1886d: 246.
 * Status as species: Roger, 1861a: 8; Roger, 1863b: 18; Mayr, 1863: 439; Emery, 1889b: 495; Dalla Torre, 1893: 35; Emery, 1895k: 459; Forel, 1900d: 326; Bingham, 1903: 97; Forel, 1906b: 91; Emery, 1911d: 76; Wheeler, W.M. 1927b: 42; Menozzi, 1939a: 328; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 49; Bolton, 1995b: 303; Zhou & Ran, 2010: 107; Guénard & Dunn, 2012: 60; Bharti, Guénard, et al. 2016: 53.
 * Distribution: China, India, Myanamar.

Holotype (presumed) worker in. Labelled “type. Sm. Coll. 79. 32.” No locality is given. In the original description Smith gives the type-locality as “Australia?.” There is thus no proof that this specimen is in fact the holotype. If the “79” refers to 1879, that would rule out this specimen.

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

 * Basu P., N. Tak, and A. K. Sanyal. 2013. Ants (insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Bethuadahari wildlife sanctuary, Nadia, West Bengal, India. Rec. zool, Surv. India: 113(4): 17-22.
 * Bharti H., Y. P. Sharma, M. Bharti, and M. Pfeiffer. 2013. Ant species richness, endemicity and functional groups, along an elevational gradient in the Himalayas. Asian Myrmecology 5: 79-101.
 * Bharti H., Y. P. Sharma, and A. Kaur. 2009. Seasonal patterns of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Punjab Shivalik. Halteres 1(1): 36-47.
 * Chapman, J. W., and Capco, S. R. 1951. Check list of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Asia. Monogr. Inst. Sci. Technol. Manila 1: 1-327
 * Dad J. M., S. A. Akbar, H. Bharti, and A. A. Wachkoo. 2019. Community structure and ant species diversity across select sites ofWestern Ghats, India. Acta Ecologica Sinica 39: 219–228.
 * Emery C. 1889. Formiche di Birmania e del Tenasserim raccolte da Leonardo Fea (1885-87). Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale 27: 485-520.
 * Emery C. 1911. Hymenoptera. Fam. Formicidae. Subfam. Ponerinae. Genera Insectorum 118: 1-125.
 * Forel A. 1900. Les Formicides de l'Empire des Indes et de Ceylan. Part VII. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 13: 303-332.
 * Forel A. 1906. Les fourmis de l'Himalaya. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 42: 79-94.
 * Guénard B., and R. R. Dunn. 2012. A checklist of the ants of China. Zootaxa 3558: 1-77.
 * Tiwari R.N., B.G. Kundu, S. Roychowdhury, S.N. Ghosh. 1999. Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Pp. 211-294 in: Director; Zoological Survey of India (ed.) 1999. Fauna of West Bengal. Part 8. Insecta (Trichoptera, Thysanoptera, Neuroptera, Hymenoptera and Anoplura). Calcutta: Zoological Survey of India, iv + 442 pp.
 * Xu Z., Lai Y., Li T. and Dai S. 1998. Five species of Formicidae newly recorded in China (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Southwest Forestry College 18: 245-249.