Crematogaster erecta

Occuring in a range of habitats, C. erecta form large polydomous colonies with workers that seemingly populate all the standing vegetation within reach of their foragers.

Identification
Longino (2003) - This species shares most of the characters of Crematogaster crinosa relatives (face with sparse erect setae over short appressed pubescence, sparse erect setae on mesosomal dorsum, short upturned propodeal spines) but differs in the presence of long flexuous rather than short stiff setae on the pronotal humeri. Similar species are crinosa, Crematogaster torosa, Crematogaster rochai, and Crematogaster moelleri. With practice some general habitus characters differentiate it from these four. The propodeal spines are a bit thinner and longer and the size polymorphism less pronounced. The flexuous rather than stiff humeral setae differentiate it from the first three. Crematogaster moelleri also has flexuous setae on the mesosoma, but on moelleri all the setae on the mesosomal dorsum are long and flexuous, rather than just those on the humeri.

Distribution
Longino (2003) - Costa Rica to Amazonian Brazil, Peru.

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Neotropical Region: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guyana, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Suriname.

Biology
Longino (2003) - Crematogaster erecta is a widespread species that occurs in a range of habitats including wet forest, seasonal dry forest, and thorn scrub. It seems to be more common in second growth or disturbed habitats than in mature forest. In Costa Rica it only occurs in the wet forests of the southern Pacific lowlands, on the Osa Peninsula and vicinity. Where it occurs it is abundant. Its nesting and foraging behavior is similar to C. crinosa and relatives, and it seems to be an ecological cognate to these.

Mature colonies are very large and may blanket the habitat, with no clear colony boundaries. These large polydomous colonies are sometimes clearly polygynous, with multiple dealate queens dispersed among nests, and other times large areas seem to have workers and brood only, or workers, brood and alate sexuals. In areas with large colonies, workers can dominate the vegetation during the day, with columns of workers streaming along vines, across shrubs, and up and down tree trunks. At Sirena guard station in Corcovado National Park, C. erecta is extremely abundant on the buildings themselves (where it is a house pest), on clothes lines, and in all the surrounding second growth vegetation. Workers form temporary bivouacs in almost any small plant cavity, and the colony takes the form of a vast network of columns connecting nodes of clustered workers in plant cavities. These nodes vary in size, from 2cm long dead twigs containing a dozen workers to large dead branchs with thousands of workers.

Colony founding seems to be claustral and single-queened, because I have multiple collections of lone foundresses from dead stems. Thus, polygyny in large colonies must be secondary, because pleometrotic foundress associations are not found.

Foraging is primarily diurnal. Foraging ceases at night, but workers will continue visiting a bait long into the night if it is discovered during the day and remains rewarding. At night the workers do not always return to a nest center. Instead they coalesce into the above mentioned nodes and scattered worker aggregations. Early in the morning dew-covered clusters of immobile workers occur throughout the habitat, slowly remobilizing as the sun rises and the environment warms up. Workers are omnivorous, recruiting to carbohydrate and protein baits, scavenging on dead or injured insects, and visiting extrafloral nectaries. They are aggressive around resources and will defend them from other insects. I once observed workers spend several hours cleaning a small lizard carcass, revealing that they will forage on carrion.

De Oliveira et al. (2015), studying ant occupancy of Cecropia trees in southwest Bahia, Brazil, found four colonies of  opportunistically nesting in Cecropia pachystachya trees.

DaRocha et al. (2015) studied the diversity of ants found in bromeliads of a single large tree of Erythrina, a common cocoa shade tree, at an agricultural research center in Ilhéus, Brazil. Forty-seven species of ants were found in 36 of 52 the bromeliads examined. Bromeliads with suspended soil and those that were larger had higher ant diversity. Crematogaster erecta was found in 9 different bromeliads but was associated with twigs and bark cavities, rather than suspended soil or litter, of the plants.

Nomenclature

 * . Crematogaster erecta Mayr, 1866b: 902, pl. 20, fig. 12 (w.) (“Insel St Joseph”).
 * projecta. Crematogaster (Orthocrema) brevispinosa st. projecta Santschi, 1925d: 230 (w.) SURINAME.
 * Type-material: holotype worker.
 * Type-locality: Suriname: (no further data).
 * Type-depository: NHMB.
 * Subspecies of brevispinosa: Kempf, 1972a: 85; Bolton, 1995b: 160.
 * Junior synonym of erecta: Longino, 2003a: 63.
 * virgula. Crematogaster virgula Forel, 1899c: 85, pl. 4, fig. 4 (w.) COSTA RICA, PANAMA.
 * Type-material: syntype workers (number not stated).
 * Type-localities: Costa Rica (no further data) (Pittier), Costa Rica (no further data) (Tonduz), Panama: Bugaba (Champion).
 * Type-depository: MHNG.
 * Forel, 1908b: 48 (q.).
 * Combination in C. (Orthocrema): Emery, 1922e: 136.
 * Status as species: Forel, 1908b: 48; Emery, 1922e: 136; Menozzi, 1935b: 195; Wheeler, W.M. 1942: 198.
 * Junior synonym of erecta: Kempf, 1968b: 381; Kempf, 1972a: 87; Bolton, 1995b: 165; Longino, 2003a: 63.

Worker
Longino (2003) - HL 0.580, 0.596, 0.848; HW 0.640, 0.643, 0.886; HC 0.619, 0.610, 0.881; SL 0.471, 0.481, 0.626; EL 0.137, 0.154, 0.208; A11L 0.218; A11W 0.123; A10L 0.105; A10W 0.091; A09L 0.056; A09W 0.067; A08L 0.044; A08W 0.057; WL 0.640, 0.631, 0.890; SPL 0.117, 0.104, 0.184; PTH 0.143, 0.126, 0.196; PTL 0.187, 0.166, 0.313; PTW 0.188, 0.193, 0.280; PPL 0.171, 0.180, 0.220; PPW 0.171, 0.168, 0.252; CI 110, 108, 104; OI 24, 26, 25; SI 81, 81, 74; PTHI 76, 76, 63; PTWI 101, 116, 89; PPI 100, 93, 115; SPI 18, 16, 21; ACI 1.05.

Color red brown to black; workers of relatively uniform size, lacking pronounced size polymorphism.

In face view head subquadrate, about as wide as long, with emarginate posterior margin; mandibles shiny, smooth or with faint striae; clypeus convex, smooth and shiny or more often with weak longitudinal rugulae that converge anteromedially; scapes just attaining posterior margin of head when laid back from insertions; terminal three segments of antenna gradually lengthening and broadening, becoming increasingly densely pubescent, terminal two segments very much larger, so that antennal club appears two-segmented; scapes with short appressed pubescence, sometimes subdecumbent, never erect, with no differentiated long erect setae; face with sparse appressed to subdecument pubescence and two short erect setae about midway between posterior border and posteriormost points of frontal carinae; malar spaces and space between eyes and antennal insertions with fine longitudinal striae, rest of face smooth and shining.

Promesonotal profile forming a single convexity, mesonotum slightly elevated posteriorly, dropping abruptly to propodeal suture; propodeal suture deep in dorsal view but not visible in lateral view due to lateral carinulae that bridge the suture, these carinulae with small denticle; dorsal and posterior faces of propodeum in same plane, sloping from propodeal suture to petiolar insertion, dorsal face a narrow anterior band with irregular rugulose sculpture, long posterior face smooth and shining; propodeal spines upturned, medium length, narrowly acute and spiniform; promesonotal dorsum with weak sculpture, usually with more or less longitudinally oriented rugulae or striae; side of pronotum smooth and shining, katepisternum weakly punctatorugose, often smooth and shining medially; side of propodeum largely smooth with faint longitudinal rugulae ventrally; pronotal humeri each with a long, relatively flexuous seta, two pairs of shorter, stiffer erect setae on mesonotum, occasionally a pair of short erect setae on dorsolateral propodeum; femora and tibiae with appressed to subdecumbent pubescence, no erect setae.

Petiole in lateral view subtriangular, sublucid, with faint microsculpture, ventral margin slightly concave, dorsal margin slightly convex; anteroventral petiolar tooth strongly developed, triangular, acute, curving ventrally; dorsal face of propodeum smooth and shiny, about as wide as long, sides convex, widest point of petiole about midlength; posterolateral tubercles each with a stiff erect posteriorly directed seta; postpetiole lacking ventral tooth, globular in dorsal view, about as long as wide, with about four erect posteriorly directed setae; fourth abdominal tergite smooth and shining, with sparse appressed pubescence and abundant long stiff flattened erect setae that are evenly distributed across tergite.

Queen
Longino (2003) - A normal queen (dorsal face of propodeum drops steeply from postscutellum and much of propodeum appears ventral to scutellum and postscutellum) with general shape, sculpture, and pilosity characters of the worker; size characters as in Figures.

Type Material
Longino (2003) - Lectotype worker: “Insel St. Joseph” [Kempf (1968) examined types in Riksmuseum, Stockholm; designated lectotype, suggested Islas Las Perlas, Panama, as source].

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

 * Achury R., and A.V. Suarez. 2017. Richness and composition of ground-dwelling ants in tropical rainforest and surrounding landscapes in the Colombian Inter-Andean valley. Neotropical Entomology https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-017-0565-4
 * Basset Y., L. Cizek, P. Cuenoud, R. K. Didham, F. Guilhaumon, O. Missa, V. Novotny, F. Odegaards, T. Roslin, J. Schmidl et al. 2012. Arthropod diversity in a tropical forest. Science 338(6113): 1481-1484.
 * Coelho M. S., G. W. Fernandes, J. C. Santos, and J. H. C. Delabie. 2009. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as bioindicators of land restoration in a Brazilian Atlantic forest fragment. Sociobiology 54(1): 51-63.
 * Dattilo W. et al. 2019. MEXICO ANTS: incidence and abundance along the Nearctic-Neotropical interface. Ecology https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2944
 * Del Toro, I., M. Vázquez, W.P. Mackay, P. Rojas and R. Zapata-Mata. Hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de Tabasco: explorando la diversidad de la mirmecofauna en las selvas tropicales de baja altitud. Dugesiana 16(1):1-14.
 * Fernández, F. and S. Sendoya. 2004. Lista de las hormigas neotropicales. Biota Colombiana Volume 5, Number 1.
 * Franco W., N. Ladino, J. H. C. Delabie, A. Dejean, J. Orivel, M. Fichaux, S. Groc, M. Leponce, and R. M. Feitosa. 2019. First checklist of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of French Guiana. Zootaxa 4674(5): 509-543.
 * Garcia Moreno D., R. W. Jones, W. P. Mackay, and P. R. Fernandez. 2003. Diversity and habitat associations of the ants (Insecta: Formicidae) of El Eden Ecological Reserve. In: Gómez-Pompa, A., Allen, M.F., Fedick, S.L., Jiménez-Osornio, J.J. (eds.)The Lowland Maya Area: three millennia at the human-wildland interface. The Haworth Press. New York. Pp. 293-304.
 * INBio Collection (via Gbif)
 * Kempf W. W. 1968. Miscellaneous studies on Neotropical ants. IV. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Studia Entomologica 11: 369-415.
 * Kempf, W.W. 1972. Catalago abreviado das formigas da regiao Neotropical (Hym. Formicidae) Studia Entomologica 15(1-4).
 * Lachaud J. P., and G. Perez-Lachaud. 2013. Revisión preliminar de las hormigas de Campeche y Quintana Roo, México, con base en la colección de Arthropoda del Colegio de la Frontera Sur. In Formicidae de Mexico (eds. M. Vasquez-Bolanos, G. Castano-Meneses, A. Cisneros-Caballero, G. A. Quiroz-Rocha, and J. L. Navarrete-Heredia) p21-32.
 * Leponce M., J. H. C. Delabie, J. Orivel, J. Jacquemin, M. Calvo Martin, and A. Dejean. 2019. Tree-dwelling ant survey (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Mitaraka, French Guiana, in Touroult J. (ed.), “Our Planet Reviewed” 2015 large-scale biotic survey in Mitaraka, French Guiana. Zoosystema 41 (10): 163-179.
 * Longino J. et al. ADMAC project. Accessed on March 24th 2017 at https://sites.google.com/site/admacsite/
 * Longino, J.T. 2003. The Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae) of Costa Rica. Zootaxa 151:1-150
 * Lopes M. C., G. P. A. Lamarre, C. Baraloto, P. V. A. Fine, A. Vincentini, and F. B. Baccaro. 2019. The Amazonas-trap: a new method for sampling plant-inhabiting arthropod communities in tropical forest understory. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12797
 * Menozzi C. 1935. Spedizione del Prof. Nello Beccari nella Guiana Britannica. Hymenoptera-Formicidae. Redia. 21: 189-203.
 * Miranda P. N., F. B. Baccaro, E. F. Morato, M. A. Oliveira. J. H. C. Delabie. 2017. Limited effects of low-intensity forest management on ant assemblages in southwestern Amazonian forests. Biodivers. Conserv. DOI 10.1007/s10531-017-1368-y
 * Nascimento Santos M., J. H. C. Delabie, and J. M. Queiroz. 2019. Biodiversity conservation in urban parks: a study of ground-dwelling ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Rio de Janeiro City. Urban Ecosystems https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00872-8
 * Neves F. S., K. S. Queiroz-Dantas, W. D. da Rocha, and J. H. C. Delabie. 2013. Ants of Three Adjacent Habitats of a Transition Region Between the Cerrado and Caatinga Biomes: The Effects of Heterogeneity and Variation in Canopy Cover. Neotrop Entomol 42: 258268.
 * Neves F. S., R. F. Braga, M. M. do Espirito-Santo, J. H. C. Delabie, G. Wilson Fernandes, and G. A. Sanchez-Azofeifa. 2010. Diversity of Arboreal Ants In a Brazilian Tropical Dry Forest: Effects Of Seasonality and Successional Stage. Sociobiology 56(1): 1-18.
 * Novais, S. M., W. D. DaRocha, N. Calderon-Cortes, and M. Quesada. 2017. Wood-boring beetles promote ant nest cavities: extended effects of a twig-girdler ecosystem engineer. Basic and Applied Ecology 24: 53-59.
 * Pires de Prado L., R. M. Feitosa, S. Pinzon Triana, J. A. Munoz Gutierrez, G. X. Rousseau, R. Alves Silva, G. M. Siqueira, C. L. Caldas dos Santos, F. Veras Silva, T. Sanches Ranzani da Silva, A. Casadei-Ferreira, R. Rosa da Silva, and J. Andrade-Silva. 2019. An overview of the ant fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the state of Maranhao, Brazil. Pap. Avulsos Zool. 59: e20195938.
 * Rojas P., A. Angeles, J. Amador, and L. Hernandez. 2007. Diversity of soil ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. 14 pp. Informe final del proyecto Management of agrobiodiversity for sustainable land use and global environmental benefits (BGBD/TSBF/PNUMA/ Apoyado por el GEF,  responsable I. Barois).
 * Santschi F. 1925. Nouveaux Formicides brésiliens et autres. Bulletin et Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 65: 221-247.
 * Ulyssea M. A., and C. R. F. Brandao. 2013. Ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the seasonally dry tropical forest of northeastern Brazil: a compilation from field surveys in Bahia and literature records. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 57(2): 217224.
 * Ulysséa M. A., C. R. F. Brandão. 2013. Ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the seasonally dry tropical forest of northeastern Brazil: a compilation from field surveys in Bahia and literature records. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 57(2): 217-224.
 * Vasconcelos, H.L. and J.M.S. Vilhena. 2006. Species turnover and vertical partitioning of ant assemblages in the Brazilian Amazon: A comparison of forests and savannas. Biotropica 38(1):100-106.
 * Vasconcelos, H.L., J.M.S. Vilhena, W.E. Magnusson and A.L.K.M. Albernaz. 2006. Long-term effects of forest fragmentation on Amazonian ant communities. Journal of Biogeography 33:1348-1356
 * Viana-Silva F. E. C., and C. M. Jacobi. 2012. Myrmecofauna of Ironstone Outcrops: Composition and Diversity. Neotrop Entomol 41: 263271.
 * Vásquez-Bolaños M. 2011. Lista de especies de hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) para México. Dugesiana 18: 95-133
 * Wheeler W. M. 1905. The ants of the Bahamas, with a list of the known West Indian species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 21: 79-135.
 * Wheeler W. M. 1942. Studies of Neotropical ant-plants and their ants. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 90: 1-262.
 * Wilson, E.O. 1987. The Arboreal Ant Fauna of Peruvian Amazon Forests: A First Assessment. Biotropica 19(3):245-251.
 * de Almeida Soares S., Y. R. Suarez, W. D. Fernandes, P. M. Soares Tenorio, J. H. C. Delabie, and W. F. Antonialli-Junior. 2013. Temporal variation in the composition of ant assemblages (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) on trees in the Pantanal floodplain, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Rev. Bras. entomol. 57: 84-90
 * de Souza J. L. P., F. B. Baccarob, V. L. Landeirob, E. Franklinc, and W. E. Magnussonc. 2012. Trade-offs between complementarity and redundancy in the use of different sampling techniques for ground-dwelling ant assemblages. Applied Soil Ecology 56: 63 73.