Cephalotes haemorrhoidalis

This taxon is considered to be unidentifiable and its identity is uncertain.

Distribution based on type material
Haiti.

Nomenclature

 * . Formica haemorrhoidalis Latreille, 1802c: 276 (w.) DOMINICAN REPUBLIC.
 * Type-material: holotype (?) worker.
 * [Note: no indication of number of specimens is given.]
 * Type-locality: Dominican Republic: Santo Domingo (G. de Villeneuve).
 * Type-depository: unknown (no type-material known to exist).
 * Combination in Cryptocerus: Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835: 172;
 * combination in Cryptocerus (Paracryptocerus): Emery, 1915i: 192; Emery, 1924d: 307;
 * combination in Cryptocerus (Hypocryptocerus): Wheeler, W.M. 1920: 53; Mann, 1920: 430;
 * combination in Hypocryptocerus: Wheeler, W.M. 1936b: 200;
 * combination in Zacryptocerus: Brandão, 1991: 384;
 * combination in Cephalotes: De Andrade & Baroni Urbani, 1999: 735.
 * Status as species: Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835: 172; Smith, F. 1853: 223; Smith, F. 1858b: 192; Smith, F. 1862d: 411; Mayr, 1863: 406; Roger, 1863b: 39; Dalla Torre, 1893: 142; Wheeler, W.M. 1905b: 128; Wheeler, W.M. & Mann, 1914: 38; Emery, 1915i: 192 (footnote); Mann, 1920: 430; Emery, 1924d: 307; Menozzi & Russo, 1930: 162; Kempf, 1951: 146; Kempf, 1972a: 120; Brandão, 1991: 384; Bolton, 1995b: 426.
 * Unidentifiable taxon, incertae sedis in Cephalotes: De Andrade & Baroni Urbani, 1999: 735; Lubertazzi, 2019: 105.

Description
De Andrade & Baroni Urbani (1999) - The original description of Latreille is too vague on one hand to be useful by present standards, but it contains, on the other hand, some details about the coloration of this species not fitting any of the species presently recognised from Hispaniola. It is easy to suppose, nonetheless, that if the type of this species still exists, its discovery may imply the synonymy of one of the species described in this paper under another name. Emery (1896) shows that the pigmentation process of callow individuals in Cephalotes is not uniform but follows different morphological patterns in different species. On the basis of this observation he suggests that C. haemorrhoidalis should be an immature of Cephalotes pusillus. This guess appears very unlikely (the record of pusillus closest to Hispaniola is Trinidad) but the same explanation of incomplete pigmentation may apply much better to any member of the hamulus clade. For the time being, any further guess on the true identity of haemorrhoidalis would be purely gratuitous.

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

 * Brandao, C.R.F. 1991. Adendos ao catalogo abreviado das formigas da regiao neotropical (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Rev. Bras. Entomol. 35: 319-412.
 * Kempf W. W. 1951. A taxonomic study on the ant tribe Cephalotini (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Revista de Entomologia (Rio de Janeiro) 22:1-244
 * Mann W. M. 1920. Additions to the ant fauna of the West Indies and Central America. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 42: 403-439.
 * Menozzi C, Russo G. 1930. Contributo alla conoscenza della mirmecofauna della Repubblica Dominicana (Antille). Bollettino del Laboratorio di Zoologia Generale e Agraria della Reale Scuola Superiore d'Agricoltura. Portici. 24: 148-173.
 * Prado L. P., and C. R. F. Brandao. 2013. A Catalogue of Cephalotini ant types (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae) deposited in the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia 53(20): 285-293.
 * Wheeler W. M. 1905. The ants of the Bahamas, with a list of the known West Indian species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 21: 79-135.
 * Wheeler W. M., and W. M. Mann. 1914. The ants of Haiti. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 33: 1-61.