Key to Australian Camponotus majors of the southwestern Botanical Province

This worker key is based on: [[Media:Heterick 2009.pdf|Heterick, B. E. 2009a. A guide to the ants of South-western Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum, Supplement 76: 1-206. Part 1 PDF]]

Since the publication of this key the genus Colobopsis has been removed from its synonymy with Camponotus. Colobopsis species are therefore included in this key.

Heterick notes: The key to major and minor workers in the C. consobrinus species-group is taken from McArthur and Adams (1996; modified). Major workers This key provides couplets to known major workers: major workers for a number of species are as yet unknown, as this subcaste tends to leave the nest less frequently than the minor and media worker castes.

You may also be interested in


 * Australia
 * Camponotus
 * Colobopsis
 * Key to Australian Camponotus species

1

 * Inner surfaces of middle and hind tibiae lacking elongate setae (Figure 186a); anterior two thirds of clypeus and surrounding genae abruptly truncate (used by the ant to plug the nest entry hole in wood) (Figure 186b) . . . . . (C. macrocephalus species-group) . . . . . Colobopsis gasseri


 * Inner surfaces of middle and hind tibiae with double row of stout spines (Figure 187); clypeus and adjoining sectors of head capsule not as above . . . . . 2

2
return to couplet #1
 * Mentum with elongate, J-shaped setae near its posterior margin (C. wiederkehri species-group) (Figure 188) . . . . . 3


 * Without elongate J-shaped setae on posterior margin of mentum (Figure 189) . . . . . 9

3
return to couplet #2
 * Antennal scape and tibiae with many erect, bristly setae . . . . . 4


 * Antennal scape and tibiae lacking erect, bristly setae . . . . . 5

4
return to couplet #3
 * Dorsum of petiolar node bluntly rounded, node thick (Figure 190a); pubescence on gaster abundant, individual setae overlapping (Figure 190b . . . . . Camponotus gouldianus


 * Dorsum of petiolar node acuminate in profile, node thin, scale-like (Figure 191a); pubescence on gaster less abundant, individual setae usually not overlapping (Figure 191b) . . . . . Camponotus terebrans

5
return to couplet #3
 * In profile, posterior angle of vertex acute, relatively sharp; outline of mesosoma almost circular in outline (Figure 192) . . . . . Camponotus postcornutus


 * In profile, posterior angle of vertex obtuse, smoothly rounded; outline of mesosoma not as above (pronotum is convex, mesonotum and dorsal surface of propodeum form a straight line, except for impression of metanotal groove) (Figure 193) . . . . . 6

6
return to couplet #5
 * In profile, vertex of petiolar node broadly rounded; metanotal groove distinctly impressed (Figure 194) . . . . . Camponotus versicolor


 * In profile, vertex of petiolar node tapering to a sharp or blunt point; metanotal groove feebly impressed (Figure 195) . . . . . 7

7
return to couplet #6
 * Clypeus projecting as a rectangular disc with sharp angles (Figure 196) . . . . . Camponotus wiederkehri


 * Anterior clypeal margin broadly convex across its width (Figure 197) . . . . . 8

8
return to couplet #7
 * Profile of mesosoma weakly predominantly convex; dorsum of propodeum weakly convex, anterior face of petiolar node only slightly shorter than its posterior face (Figure 198) . . . . . Camponotus prosseri


 * Profile of mesosoma strongly sinuate; dorsum of propodeum almost straight, anterior face of petiolar node much shorter than posterior face, node inclined forward (Figure 199) . . . . . Camponotus johnclarki

9
return to couplet #2
 * Clypeus with anteromedial notch; clypeus projecting beyond genae, clypeal angles acute (C. nigriceps species-group) (Figure 200) . . . . . 10


 * Conformation of clypeus not as above . . . . . 14

10
return to couplet #9
 * Setae on venter of head capsule absent (Figure 201) . . . . . Camponotus longideclivis

202) . . . . . 11
 * Setae on venter of head capsule present (Figure

11
return to couplet #10 203). . . . . . 12
 * Dorsum of propodeum with 10 > erect setae, setae distributed over propodeum (Figure


 * Dorsum of propodeum with 10 < erect setae at or near propodeal angle (Figure 204) . . . . . 13

12
return to couplet #11
 * Head, mesosoma, node and most of gaster uniformly honey coloured . . . . . Camponotus clarior


 * Head black or brown, mesosoma yellow or red-brown . . . . . Camponotus nigriceps

13
return to couplet #11
 * Erect setae on venter of head capsule 20 >, or setae covering more than 1/2 venter area; typically, head dark brown or black, mesosoma yellowish to dark red and gaster brown or black, with or without yellowish colouration anteriad (Figure 205) . . . . . Camponotus dryandrae


 * Erect setae on venter of head capsule 20 <, or setae covering less than 1/2 venter area; typically, head, mesosoma and gaster concolorous dark brown or black (Figure 206) . . . . . Camponotus prostans

14
return to couplet #9
 * Body and appendages covered with dense, whitish, erect setae; head deeply concave; anterior margin of clypeus simple, not bilobate or bidentate (C. intrepidus species-complex) (Figure 207) . . . . . Camponotus molossus


 * Body and appendages not covered with dense, whitish, erect setae (C. whitei has dense, yellow, bristly setae) or anterior margin of clypeus emarginate . . . . . 15

15
return to couplet #14
 * Sculpture densely punctate; in profile, mesosoma with mesonotum abruptly descending to propodeum, the latter compact and rounded in outline (dorsal surfaces of body with many yellow, bristly setae) (Figure 208) . . . . . Camponotus whitei


 * Sculpture not densely punctate; mesonotum not abruptly descending to propodeum (e.g. Figure 209) . . . . . 16

16
return to couplet #15
 * In full-face view, head with posterior angles of vertex rounded in shape of small lobes, the outline of the head between them straight; antennal scape not reaching vertex; sides of head usually parallel; anteromedial margin of clypeus protruding, bidentate; mandible strongly sculptured, with six teeth and denticles; outline of mandible strongly rounded (C. ephippium species-complex) (Figure 210) . . . . . 17


 * In full-face view, head capsule differing in one or more of the above characters; mandible may have more or fewer teeth (e.g. Figure 211) . . . . . 25

17
return to couplet #16
 * Scapes with whorls of erect setae (Figure 212) . . . . . Camponotus pawseyi


 * Scape without erect setae except for one or two at the end (Figure 213) . . . . . 18

18
return to couplet #17
 * At least anterior half of frons and sides of head capsule with short, erect and sub-erect setae (Figure 214) . . . . . 19


 * Frons and sides of head capsule totally lacking erect and sub-erect setae (Figure 215) . . . . . 21

19
return to couplet #18
 * Head less massive; in dorsal view, posterior angles of vertex weakly lobate, lobes not reaching humeral angles of pronotum (Figure 216) . . . . . Camponotus cinereus notterae


 * Head more massive; in dorsal view, posterior angles of vertex strongly lobate, lobes reaching humeral angles of pronotum (Figure 217) . . . . . 20