Megalomyrmex mondabora

Boudinot et al. (2013) - This thief ant species is found in a separate chamber from the main fungal galleries within the nest structure of yeast-growing Cyphomyrmex cornutus (Adams & Longino 2007), although a single queen was once collected by RMMA with a young Cyphomyrmex rimosus colony in February 2003.

Identification
Boudinot et al. (2013) - Worker uniquely identifiable among Central American Megalomyrmex as follows (1) 8–10 small, subequal teeth subtending apical 2; (2) foraminal carina complete; (3) antennal fossa not encircled by carinulae; (4) scapes relatively long (SI > 115). Queen similarly identifiable as worker, alate. Male recognizable by the following three characters: (1) forewing submarginal cell 1 about eight times as long as width; (2) antenna infuscated at least basally; (3) petiolar and postpetiolar nodes bulbous.

The male of M. mondabora differs from Megalomyrmex mondaboroides by the following: (1) antenna infuscated; (2) occipital carina not visible in full-face view; (3) frontal and occipital carina strong. Differing from all other Central American Megalomyrmex by the following combination of characters: small (ML < 2.0 mm), crossvein 1m-cu and apical abscissa of M absent.

The compound eyes of Megalomyrmex mondabora females (queen, worker) and males are glabrous, whereas workers of Megalomyrmex mondaboroides have very sparse ocular setae and males’ eyes are glabrous.

Distribution
300-1170 m elevation

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Neotropical Region: Costa Rica, Ecuador, Honduras.

Nomenclature

 *  mondabora. Megalomyrmex mondabora Brandão, 1990: 442, fig. 95, 96 (w.) COSTA RICA. Longino, 2010: 47 (q.).

Worker
Mandibles smooth, dental formula 2+ 10; pal­ pal formula 4:3; anterior clypeal border without median denticle; 13 ocular facets at compound eye largest diameter; occipital margin raised; promesonotal suture not impressed dorsally, mesonotum distinguished from pronotum as a swollen area; metanotal groove entirely rugose; katepistemum smooth; propodeum spiracles lat­erally projected in an angle of 45° from the main axis of the body; declivity in general faintly rugose; epipetiolar carina complete; pedunculate petiole with dorsal margin of node, in side view, concave and ventral face with a anteromedian minute denticle originating a non-translucid lon­gitudinal flange; dorsal margin  of petiolar node, in frontal view, round; ventral process of postpe­tiole rugose. Color: mandibles, antennae and legs brown. Anepistemum, katepistemum and propodeum black, with the rest of the body reddish-brown dark and shinny.

Boudinot et al. (2013) - (holotype from Longino 2010): HW 0.74, HL 0.88, SL 1.08, EL 0.23, ML 1.34, SI 123, CI 85. (n=5, plus 10 from Longino 2010): HW 0.74–0.88, HL 0.86–0.96, SL 1.08–1.21, OMD 0.12–0.13, EL 0.26–0.30, ML 1.31–1.50, CI 85–93, SI 121–128, EI 33–35, OMI 40–47.

Male
Boudinot et al. (2013) - (n=2 from Longino 2010): HW 0.81–0.92, HL 0.75–0.84, SL 0.34–0.40, EL 0.36–0.41, ML 1.38–1.55, CI 45, SI 46–48, EI 44–45.

Head Antenna with 13 antennomeres; antennomere 4 apically kinked; no other antennomeres kinked, nor forming club; scape length subequal to eye length. Antenna infuscated from basad midlength to apex. Palpal formula 4,3. Mandible subfalcate; masticatory margin with 7 teeth; apical tooth more than twice length of subapical tooth; basal teeth somewhat irregular in size and spacing. Dorsal face of mandible smooth and shining, with weak piligerous punctae. Minimum distance between lateral ocellus and compound eye about four lateral ocellus lengths. Compound eye glabrous. Occipital carina visible in full-face view. Mesosoma Mesosoma somewhat attenuate: propodeum elongated. Notauli absent. Parapsidal lines distinct. Foraminal carina present; with concentric carina dorsad. Basitarsi tubular. Pterostigma present, narrow and elongate. Forewing without crossvein 1m-cu; submarginal cell 1 about eight times longer than wide; terminal abscissa of M may be weak, not sclerotized, not joined to Rs, or basally sclerotized and branching from Rs slightly distad 2r-rs. Metasoma Basipetiolar carina arc-shaped. Ventrolateral longitudinal carina of petiole present. Petiolar spiracle in anterior fourth. Posterior margin of petiole with girdling carinae; postpetiole without. Postpetiolar helcium approximately circular. Postpetiolar spiracle placed at about midlength of lateral tergal margin. Sternum of postpetiole bulging at about midlength in profile. Postpetiolar tergum asymmetrically convex; apex posterad midlength. Genitalia Abdominal sternum IX tapering to obtusely triangular apex; apical lobe not sclerotized or produced ventrally. Telomere short, triangular, with acute apex; without medial process; medial face not heavily sclerotized nor arched. Cuspis projecting apicodorsally; apical margin slanting anteroventrally. Digitus narrow to very narrow; apex bluntly rounded; dorsal margin slightly more arched than ventral margin; ventral margin not obscuring posterodorsal angle of cuspis. Valviceps about half as tall as long, subovate; dorsal margin shallowly sloping to apical margin; ventral margin weakly convex; penisvalvar teeth narrow and close-set.

Type Material
Holotype and 2 paratypes from Turialba at Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard,: 1 paratype from Turialba and 1 paratype from Vi­lhena at Museu de Zoologia da USP.

Etymology
The types of Turialba, collected by W. L. Brown Jr. between 18 and 22 of January, 1973, were found associated with workers of an uniden­tified Apterostigma (Attini). Therefore I choose the name mondabora, meaning robber in Tupi.